Numerous studies have shown that individuals’ help-seeking behavior increases when a computerized helper is endowed with humanlike features in nonachievement contexts. In contrast, the current research suggests that anthropomorphic helpers are not universally conducive to help-seeking behavior in contexts of achievement, particularly among individuals who construe help seeking as a display of incompetence (i.e., entity theorists). Study 1 demonstrated that when entity theorists received help from an anthropomorphized (vs. a nonanthropomorphized) helper, they were more concerned about negative judgments from other people, whereas incremental theorists were not affected by anthropomorphic features. Study 2 showed that when help was provided by an anthropomorphized (vs. a nonanthropomorphized) helper, entity theorists were less likely to seek help, even at the cost of lower performance. In contrast, incremental theorists’ help-seeking behavior and task performance were not affected by anthropomorphism. This research deepens the current understanding of the role of anthropomorphic computerized helpers in online learning contexts.
AlevenV.KoedingerK. R. (2000). Limitations of student control: Do students know when they need help? In GauthierG.FrassonC.VanLehnK. (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 1839. Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 292–303). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/3-540-45108-0_33
2.
AlevenV.StahlE.SchwormS.FischerF.WallaceR. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73, 277–320. doi:10.3102/00346543073003277
3.
AshfordS. J. (1986). Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 465–487. doi:10.2307/256219
4.
BickmoreT. W.CarusoL.Clough-GorrK.HeerenT. (2005). ‘It’s just like you talk to a friend’: Relational agents for older adults. Interacting with Computers, 17, 711–735. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2005.09.002
5.
BickmoreT. W.PuskarK.SchlenkE. A.PfeiferL. M.SereikaS. M. (2010). Maintaining reality: Relational agents for antipsychotic medication adherence. Interacting With Computers, 22, 276–288. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2010.02.001
6.
BlackwellL. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
7.
BohnsV. K.FlynnF. J. (2010). “Why didn’t you just ask?” Underestimating the discomfort of help-seeking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 402–409. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.015
8.
BowdenE. M.Jung-BeemanM. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 634–639. doi:10.3758/BF03195543
9.
DweckC. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
10.
DweckC. S. (2002). The development of ability conceptions. In WigfieldA.EcclesJ. (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 57–88). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50005-X
11.
DweckC. S.ElliottE. S. (1983). Achievement motivation. In MussenP. H. (Gen. Ed.) & HetheringtonE. M. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Socialization, personality and social development (Vol. 4, pp. 643–691). New York, NY: Wiley.
12.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
13.
DyczewskiE. A.MarkmanK. D. (2012). General attainability beliefs moderate the motivational effects of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1217–1220. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.016
14.
EpleyN.WaytzA.CacioppoJ. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114, 864–886. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
15.
FlynnF. J.LakeV. K. (2008). If you need help, just ask: Underestimating compliance with direct requests for help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 128–143. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.128
16.
HarasimL. (2000). Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 3, 41–61. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00032-4
17.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18.
HeerinkM.KröseB.EversV.WielingaB. J. (2008). The influence of social presence on acceptance of a companion robot by older people. Journal of Physical Agents, 2(2), 33–40.
19.
HongY.-Y.ChiuC.-Y.DweckC. S.LinD. M.-S.WanW. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588–599. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588
20.
KarabenickS. A.KnappJ. R. (1988). Effects of computer privacy on help seeking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 461–472. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb00029.x
21.
KatzJ. E.HalpernD. (2014). Attitudes towards robots suitability for various jobs as affected by robot appearance. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33, 941–953. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2013.783115
McBreenH. M.JackM. A. (2001). Evaluating humanoid synthetic agents in e-retail applications. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 31, 394–405.
24.
MednickS. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232. doi:10.1037/h0048850
25.
MieleD. B.MoldenD. C. (2010). Naive theories of intelligence and the role of processing fluency in perceived comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 535–557. doi:10.1037/a0019745
26.
NadlerA.Chernyak-HaiL. (2014). Helping them stay where they are: Status effects on dependency/autonomy-oriented helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 58–72. doi:10.1037/a0034152
27.
NadlerA.Harpaz-GorodeiskyG.Ben-DavidY. (2009). Defensive helping: Threat to group identity, ingroup identification, status stability, and common group identity as determinants of intergroup help-giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 823–834. doi:10.1037/a0015968
28.
NassC.SteuerJ.TauberE. R. (1994). Computers are social actors. In AdelsonB.DumaisS.OlsonJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 72–78). New York, NY: ACM.
29.
Nelson-Le GallS. (1985). Help-seeking behavior in learning. Review of Research in Education, 12, 55–90.
30.
NewmanR. S. (1994). Adaptive help seeking: A strategy of self-regulated learning. In SchunkD.ZimmermanB. (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 283–301). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31.
OppenheimerD. M.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
32.
ParkD.KimS. (2015). Time to move on? When entity theorists perform better than incremental theorists. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 736–748. doi:10.1177/0146167215578028
33.
PinelleD.WongN.StachT. (2008). Heuristic evaluation for games: Usability principles for video game design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1453–1462). New York, NY: ACM.
34.
PlaksJ. E.StecherK. (2007). Unexpected improvement, decline, and stasis: A prediction confidence perspective on achievement success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 667–684. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.667
35.
RattanA.GoodC.DweckC. S. (2012). “It’s ok—Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 731–737. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012
36.
ReevesB.NassC. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
37.
RobinsB.DautenhahnK.Te BoekhorstR.BillardA. (2005). Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: Can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills?Universal Access in the Information Society, 4, 105–120. doi:10.1007/s10209-005-0116-3
38.
RyanA. M.PintrichP. R. (1997). “Should I ask for help?” The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents’ help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 329–341. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.329
39.
ShariffA. F.NorenzayanA. (2007). God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803–809. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01983.x
40.
TakeuchiL. M.VaalaS. (2014). Level up learning: A national survey on teaching with digital games. New York, NY: Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
41.
van der MeijH. (1998). The great divide between teacher and student questioning. In KarabenickS. A. (Ed.), Strategic help seeking: Implications for learning and teaching (pp. 195–218). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42.
VandeWalleD.GanesanS.ChallagallaG. N.BrownS. P. (2000). An integrated model of feedback-seeking behavior: Disposition, context, and cognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 996–1003. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.996
WatsonJ.PapeL.MurinA.GeminB.VashawL. (2014). Keeping pace with K-12 digital learning: An annual review of policy and practice. Durango, CO: Evergreen Education Group.
45.
WaytzA.EpleyN.CacioppoJ. T. (2010). Social cognition unbound: Insights into anthropomorphism and dehumanization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 58–62. doi:10.1177/0963721409359302
46.
WoodH.WoodD. (1999). Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Computers and Education, 33, 153–169. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00030-5
47.
YeagerD. S.DweckC. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47, 302–314. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.722805
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
