Habits underlie much of human behavior. However, people may prefer agentic accounts that overlook habits in favor of inner states, such as mood. We tested this misattribution hypothesis in an online experiment of helping behavior (N = 809 adults) as well as in an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study of U.S. college students’ everyday coffee drinking (N = 112). Both studies revealed a substantial gap between perceived and actual drivers of behavior: Habit strength outperformed or matched inner states in predicting behavior, but participants’ explanations of their behavior emphasized inner states. Participants continued to misattribute habits to inner states when incentivized for accuracy and when explaining other people’s behavior. We discuss how this misperception could adversely influence self-regulation.
AdriaanseM. A.VinkersC. D. W.De RidderD. T. D.HoxJ. J.De WitJ. B. F. (2011). Do implementation intentions help to eat a healthy diet? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Appetite, 56, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.10.012
Avni-BabadD. (2011). Routine and feelings of safety, confidence, and well-being. British Journal of Psychology, 102(2), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712610X513617
5.
CrandallC. S.D’AnelloS.SakalliN.LazarusE.NejtardtG. W.FeatherN. T. (2001). An attribution-value model of prejudice: Anti-fat attitudes in six nations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201271003
6.
DuckworthA. L.GendlerT. S.GrossJ. J. (2016). Situational strategies for self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615623247
7.
GallaB. M.DuckworthA. L. (2015). More than resisting temptation: Beneficial habits mediate the relationship between self-control and positive life outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 508–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000026
8.
GardnerB.AbrahamC.LallyP.de BruijnG. J. (2012). Towards parsimony in habit measurement: Testing the convergent and predictive validity of an automaticity subscale of the Self-Report Habit Index. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9, Article 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-102
HaggerM. S.RebarA. L.MullanB.LippO. V.ChatzisarantisN. L. D. (2015). The subjective experience of habit captured by self-report indexes may lead to inaccuracies in the measurement of habitual action. Health Psychology Review, 9(3), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2014.959728
11.
HardwickR. M.ForrenceA. D.KrakauerJ. W.HaithA. M. (2019). Time-dependent competition between goal-directed and habitual response preparation. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(12), 1252–1262. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0725-0
12.
HeintzelmanS. J.KingL. A. (2019). Routines and meaning in life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(5), 688–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218795133
JonesE. E.NisbettR. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In JonesE. E.KanouseD. E.KellyH. H.NisbettR. E.ValinsS.WeinerB. (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79–94). General Learning Press.
MalleB. F. (2006). The actor-observer asymmetry in attribution: A (surprising) meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 895–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.895
17.
MazarA.WoodW. (2018). Defining habit in psychology. In VerplankenB. (Ed.), The psychology of habit: Theory, mechanisms, change, and contexts (pp. 13–29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97529-0_2
18.
McFerranB.MukhopadhyayA. (2013). Lay theories of obesity predict actual body mass. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1428–1436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612473121
19.
MillsC.D’MelloS. (2014). On the validity of the autobiographical emotional memory task for emotion induction. PLOS ONE, 9(4), Article e95837. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095837
20.
ProninE. (2009). The introspection illusion. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 1–67). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)00401-2
21.
R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.1.0) [Computer software]. https://www.R-project.org/
ShiffmanS.HuffordM.HickcoxM.PatyJ. A.GnysM.KasselJ. D. (1997). Remember that? A comparison of real-time versus retrospective recall of smoking lapses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(2), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.65.2.292.a
24.
ThompsonE. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106297301
25.
VerplankenB.OrbellS. (2003). Reflections on past behavior: A self-report index of habit strength. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(6), 1313–1330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01951.x
26.
WenC. K. F.SchneiderS.StoneA. A.Spruijt-MetzD. (2017). Compliance with mobile ecological momentary assessment protocols in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(4), Article e132. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6641
27.
WilsonT. D.LaserP. S.StoneJ. I. (1982). Judging the predictors of one’s own mood: Accuracy and the use of shared theories. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(6), 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(82)90072-5
28.
WoodW.MazarA.NealD. T. (2022). Habits and goals in human behavior: Separate but interacting systems. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(2), 590–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691621994226
29.
WoodW.QuinnJ. M.KashyD. A. (2002). Habits in everyday life: Thought, emotion, and action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1281–1297. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1281
30.
ZhangZ.YuanK.-H. (2018). Practical statistical power analysis using WebPower and R. ISDSA Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
