Bribery is a common form of corruption that takes place when a briber suborns a power holder to achieve an advantageous outcome at the cost of moral transgression. Although bribery has been extensively investigated in the behavioral sciences, its underlying neurobiological basis remains poorly understood. Here, we employed transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) in combination with a novel paradigm (N = 119 adults) to investigate whether disruption of right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rDLPFC) causally changed bribe-taking decisions of power holders. Perturbing rDLPFC via tDCS specifically made participants more willing to take bribes as the relative value of the offer increased. This tDCS-induced effect could not be explained by changes in other measures. Model-based analyses further revealed that such neural modulation alters the concern for generating profits for oneself via taking bribes and reshapes the concern for the distribution inequity between oneself and the briber, thereby influencing the subsequent decisions. These findings reveal a causal role of rDLPFC in modulating corrupt behavior.
AbbinkK. (2006). Laboratory experiments on corruption. In Rose-AckermanS. (Ed.), International handbook on the economics of corruption (pp. 418–437). Edward Elgar.
2.
AhnW.-Y.HainesN.ZhangL. (2017). Revealing neuro-computational mechanisms of reinforcement learning and decision-making with the hBayesDM package. Computational Psychiatry, 1, 24–57.
3.
BhanjiJ. P.DelgadoM. R. (2014). The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(1), 61–73.
CrockettM. J.Kurth-NelsonZ.SiegelJ. Z.DayanP.DolanR. J. (2014). Harm to others outweighs harm to self in moral decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111(48), 17320–17325.
6.
DelgadoM. R.FrankR. H.PhelpsE. A. (2005). Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nature Neuroscience, 8(11), 1611–1618. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1575
7.
DreherA.KotsogiannisC.McCorristonS. (2007). Corruption around the world: Evidence from a structural model. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(3), 443–466.
8.
FehrE.KrajbichI. (2014). Social preferences and the brain. In GlimcherP. W.FehrE. (Eds.), Neuroeconomics (2nd ed., pp. 193–218). Elsevier.
9.
FischbacherU.Föllmi-HeusiF. (2013). Lies in disguise—An experimental study on cheating. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 525–547.
10.
GaoX.YuH.SáezI.BlueP. R.ZhuL.HsuM.ZhouX. (2018). Distinguishing neural correlates of context-dependent advantageous- and disadvantageous-inequity aversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115(33), E7680–E7689.
11.
GneezyU.KajackaiteA.SobelJ. (2018). Lying aversion and the size of the lie. American Economic Review, 108(2), 419–453.
12.
GreeneJ. D.PaxtonJ. M. (2009). Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106(30), 12506–12511.
13.
HuY.HeL.ZhangL.WölkT.DreherJ.-C.WeberB. (2018). Spreading inequality: Neural computations underlying paying-it-forward reciprocity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13(6), 578–589. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy040
14.
HuY.HuC.DerringtonE.CorgnetB.QuC.DreherJ.-C. (2021). Neural basis of corruption in power-holders. eLife, 10, Article e63922. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63922
15.
HuangY.DattaA.BiksonM.ParraL. C. (2019). Realistic volumetric-approach to simulate transcranial electric stimulation—ROAST—a fully automated open-source pipeline. Journal of Neural Engineering, 16(5), Article 056006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ab208d
16.
JacobsonL.KoslowskyM.LavidorM. (2012). tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: A meta-analytical review. Experimental Brain Research, 216(1), 1–10.
17.
KarimA. A.SchneiderM.LotzeM.VeitR.SausengP.BraunC.BirbaumerN. (2010). The truth about lying: Inhibition of the anterior prefrontal cortex improves deceptive behavior. Cerebral Cortex, 20(1), 205–213.
18.
KnochD.NitscheM. A.FischbacherU.EiseneggerC.FehrE. (2008). Studying the neurobiology of social interaction with transcranial direct current stimulation—The example of punishing unfairness. Cerebral Cortex, 18(9), 1987–1990.
19.
KnochD.Pascual-LeoneA.MeyerK.TreyerV.FehrE. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science, 314(5800), 829–832.
20.
KöbisN. C.van ProoijenJ.-W.RighettiF.Van LangeP. A. (2016). Prospection in individual and interpersonal corruption dilemmas. Review of General Psychology, 20(1), 71–85.
21.
López-AlonsoV.CheeranB.Río-RodríguezD.Fernández-del-OlmoM. (2014). Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. Brain Stimulation, 7(3), 372–380.
22.
MameliF.Mrakic-SpostaS.VergariM.FumagalliM.MacisM.FerrucciR.NordioF.ConsonniD.SartoriG.PrioriA. (2010). Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex specifically processes general – but not personal – knowledge deception: Multiple brain networks for lying. Behavioural Brain Research, 211(2), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.03.024
23.
MaréchalM. A.CohnA.UgazioG.RuffC. C. (2017). Increasing honesty in humans with noninvasive brain stimulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114(17), 4360–4364.
24.
MauroP. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712.
25.
MazarN.AmirO.ArielyD. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633–644.
QuC.HuY.TangZ.DerringtonE.DreherJ.-C. (2020). Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying immoral decisions benefiting self or others. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15(2), 135–149.
28.
RangelA.CamererC.MontagueP. R. (2008). A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(7), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2357
29.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.5.3) [Computer software]. https://www.r-project.org/
30.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.6.3) [Computer software]. https://www.rproject.org/
31.
RuffC. C.UgazioG.FehrE. (2013). Changing social norm compliance with noninvasive brain stimulation. Science, 342(6157), 482–484.
32.
SerraD.WantchekonL. (Eds.) (2012). Research in experimental economics: Vol. 15. New advances in experimental research on corruption. Emerald Group.
33.
SpeitelC.Traut-MattauschE.JonasE. (2019). Functions of the right DLPFC and right TPJ in proposers and responders in the ultimatum game. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 14(3), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsz005
34.
TremblayS.LepageJ. F.Latulipe-LoiselleA.FregniF.ThéoretH. (2014). The uncertain outcome of prefrontal tDCS. Brain Stimulation, 7(6), 773–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.10.003
35.
WiethoffS.HamadaM.RothwellJ. C. (2014). Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. Brain Stimulation, 7(3), 468–475.
36.
YinL.WeberB. (2019). I lie, why don’t you: Neural mechanisms of individual differences in self-serving lying. Human Brain Mapping, 40(4), 1101–1113. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24432
37.
ZhuL.JenkinsA. C.SetE.ScabiniD.KnightR. T.ChiuP. H.King-CasasB.HsuM. (2014). Damage to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects tradeoffs between honesty and self-interest. Nature Neuroscience, 17(10), 1319–1321. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3798
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
