As children age, they can learn increasingly complex features of environmental structure—a key prerequisite for adaptive decision-making. Yet when we tested children (N = 304, 4–13 years old) in the Children’s Gambling Task, an age-appropriate variant of the Iowa Gambling Task, we found that age was negatively associated with performance. However, this paradoxical effect of age was found only in children who exhibited a maladaptive deplete-replenish bias, a tendency to shift choices after positive outcomes and repeat choices after negative outcomes. We found that this bias results from sensitivity to incidental nonrandom structure in the canonical, deterministic forms of these tasks—and that it would actually lead to optimal outcomes if the tasks were not deterministic. Our results illustrate that changes in decision-making across early childhood reflect, in part, increasing sensitivity to environmental structure.
AhnW.-Y.BusemeyerJ. R. (2016). Challenges and promises for translating computational tools into clinical practice. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 11, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.02.001
2.
AhnW.-Y.BusemeyerJ. R.WagenmakersE.-J.StoutJ. (2008). Comparison of decision learning models using the generalization criterion method. Cognitive Science, 32(8), 1376–1402. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210802352992
3.
BecharaA.DamasioA.DamasioH.AndersonS. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1–3), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3
4.
BecharaA.DamasioH.TranelD.DamasioA. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275(5304), 1293–1295. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5304.1293
5.
BeitzK. M.SalthouseT. A.DavisH. P. (2014). Performance on the Iowa Gambling Task: From 5 to 89 years of age. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1677–1689. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035823
6.
BetzL. T.BrambillaP.IlankovicA.PremkumarP.KimM. S.RaffardS.BayardS.HoriH.LeeK. U.LeeS. J.KoutsoulerisN.KambeitzJ. (2019). Deciphering reward-based decision-making in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis and behavioral modeling of the Iowa Gambling Task. Schizophrenia Research, 204, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2018.09.009
ChiuY.-C.HuangJ. T.DuannJ. R.LinC. H. (2018). Editorial: Twenty years after the Iowa Gambling Task: Rationality, emotion, and decision-making. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2353. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02353
9.
ChiuY.-C.LinC.-H. (2007). Is deck C an advantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task?Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3(1), Article 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-3-37
10.
CroneE. A.van der MolenM. W. (2004). Developmental changes in real life decision making: Performance on a gambling task previously shown to depend on the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Developmental Neuropsychology, 25(3), 251–279.
11.
da MataF.NevesF. S.LageG. M.de MoraesP. H. P.MattosP.FuentesD.CorrêaH.Malloy-DinizL. (2011). Neuropsychological assessment of the decision making process in children and adolescents: An integrative review of the literature. Archives of Clinical Psychiatry, 38(3), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832011000300005
12.
DawN. D.O’DohertyJ. P. (2014). Multiple systems for value learning. In GlimcherP. W.FehrE. (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain (2nd ed., pp. 393–410). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416008-8.00021-8
13.
DeckerJ. H.OttoA. R.DawN. D.HartleyC. A. (2016). From creatures of habit to goal-directed learners: Tracking the developmental emergence of model-based reinforcement learning. Psychological Science, 27(6), 848–858. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616639301
14.
DozmorovM. G.BilboS. D.KollinsS. H.ZuckerN.DoE. K.SchechterJ. C.ZhangJ. J.MurphyS. K.HoyoC.FuemmelerB. F. (2018). Associations between maternal cytokine levels during gestation and measures of child cognitive abilities and executive functioning. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 70(3), 390–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2018.03.029
15.
EdgeM. D.JohnsonS. L.NgT.CarverC. S. (2013). Iowa Gambling Task performance in euthymic bipolar I disorder: A meta-analysis and empirical study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 150(1), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.027
16.
EvensR.HoeflerM.BiberK.LuekenU. (2016). The Iowa Gambling Task in Parkinson’s disease: A meta-analysis on effects of disease and medication. Neuropsychologia, 91, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.032
17.
FellowsL. K.FarahM. J. (2005). Different underlying impairments in decision-making following ventromedial and dorsolateral frontal lobe damage in humans. Cerebral Cortex, 15(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh108
GillanC. M.OttoA. R.PhelpsE. A.DawN. D. (2015). Model-based learning protects against forming habits. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(3), 523–536. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0347-6
21.
GlimcherP. W. (2014). Value-based decision making. In GlimcherP. W.FehrE. (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain (2nd ed., pp. 373–391). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416008-8.00020-6
22.
HainesN.VassilevaJ.AhnW.-Y. (2018). The outcome-representation learning model: A novel reinforcement learning model of the Iowa Gambling Task. Cognitive Science, 42(8), 2534–2561. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12688
23.
HarrisP. A.TaylorR.MinorB. L.ElliottV.FernandezM.O’NealL.McLeodL.DelacquaG.DelacquaF.KirbyJ.DudaS. N. (2019). The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 95, Article 103208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
24.
HarrisP. A.TaylorR.ThielkeR.PayneJ.GonzalezN.CondeJ. G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap): A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
25.
HartleyC. A.SomervilleL. H. (2015). The neuroscience of adolescent decision-making. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 5, 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.09.004
26.
HealyS.HurlyT. A. (1995). Spatial memory in rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus): A field test. Animal Learning & Behavior, 23(1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198016
27.
HertwigR.WulffD. U.MataR. (2019). Three gaps and what they may mean for risk preference. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 374(1766), Article 20180140. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0140
HoyoC.MurthaA.SchildkrautJ.FormanM.CalingaertB.Demark-WahnefriedW.KurtzbergJ.JirtleR.MurphyS. (2011). Folic acid supplementation before and during pregnancy in the Newborn Epigenetics STudy (NEST). BMC Public Health, 11(1), Article 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-46
KovácsI.RichmanM. J.JankaZ.MarazA.AndóB. (2017). Decision making measured by the Iowa Gambling Task in alcohol use disorder and gambling disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 181, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.023
32.
LiuY.MurphyS. K.MurthaA. P.FuemmelerB. F.SchildkrautJ.HuangZ.OvercashF.KurtzbergJ.JirtleR.IversenE. S.FormanM. R.HoyoC. (2012). Depression in pregnancy, infant birth weight and DNA methylation of imprint regulatory elements. Epigenetics, 7(7), 735–746. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.20734
33.
MataR.JosefA. K.Samanez-LarkinG. R.HertwigR. (2011). Age differences in risky choice: A meta-analysis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06200.x
34.
NussenbaumK.HartleyC. A. (2019). Reinforcement learning across development: What insights can we draw from a decade of research?Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 40, Article 100733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100733
35.
PrencipeA.KesekA.CohenJ.LammC.LewisM. D.ZelazoP. D. (2011). Development of hot and cool executive function during the transition to adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(3), 621–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.09.008
36.
RaabH.HartleyC. (2018). The development of goal-directed decision-making. In MorrisR.BornsteinA.ShenhavA. (Eds.), Goal-directed decision making: Computations and neural circuits (pp. 279–308). Elsevier Science & Technology.
37.
RotgeJ.-Y.PoitouC.FossatiP.Aron-WisnewskyJ.OppertJ.-M. (2017). Decision-making in obesity without eating disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Iowa Gambling Task performances. Obesity Reviews, 18(8), 936–942. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12549
38.
SmithD. G.XiaoL.BecharaA. (2012). Decision making in children and adolescents: Impaired Iowa Gambling Task performance in early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 48(4), 1180–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026342
39.
SteingroeverH.WetzelsR.HorstmannA.NeumannJ.WagenmakersE.-J. (2013). Performance of healthy participants on the Iowa Gambling Task. Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029929
40.
SteingroeverH.WetzelsR.WagenmakersE.-J. (2013). A comparison of reinforcement learning models for the Iowa Gambling Task using parameter space partitioning. The Journal of Problem Solving, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1150
41.
WorthyD.HawthorneM.OttoA. R. (2013). Heterogeneity of strategy use in the Iowa Gambling Task: A comparison of win-stay/lose-shift and reinforcement learning models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(2), 364–371. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0324-9
42.
ZeifD.YechiamE. (2020). Autism is not associated with poor or enhanced performance on the Iowa Gambling Task: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 113, 440–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.04.016
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
