Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Social learning—the ability to learn from observing the decisions of other people and the outcomes of those decisions—is fundamental to human evolutionary and cultural success. The Internet now provides social evidence on an unprecedented scale. However, properly utilizing this evidence requires a capacity for statistical inference. We examined how people’s interpretation of online review scores is influenced by the numbers of reviews—a potential indicator both of an item’s popularity and of the precision of the average review score. Our task was designed to pit statistical information against social information. We modeled the behavior of an “intuitive statistician” using empirical prior information from millions of reviews posted on Amazon.com and then compared the model’s predictions with the behavior of experimental participants. Under certain conditions, people preferred a product with more reviews to one with fewer reviews even though the statistical model indicated that the latter was likely to be of higher quality than the former. Overall, participants’ judgments suggested that they failed to make meaningful statistical inferences.

Keywords

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akaike

(1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.110070

Bearden

W. O.

Etzel

M. J.

(1982). Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 183–194.

Bikhchandani

Hirshleifer

Welch

(1998). Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 151–170. doi:10.1257/jep.12.3.151

Castro

Toro

M. A.

(2004). The evolution of culture: From primate social learning to human culture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101, 10235–10240.

Chen

Y. F.

(2008). Herd behavior in purchasing books online. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1977–1992. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.08.004

Cialdini

R. B.

(2009). Influence: Science and practice (Vol. 4). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Galef

B. G.

Jr. (2001). Social influences on food choices of Norway rats and mate choices of Japanese quail. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 14, 1–24. doi:10.1006/appe.2001.0494

Galef

B. G.

Jr. Laland

K. N.

(2005). Social learning in animals: Empirical studies and theoretical models. Bioscience, 55, 489–499.

Galef

B. G.

Jr. Whiskin

E. E.

(2000). Social influences on the amount of food eaten by Norway rats. Appetite, 34, 327–332.

10.

Gigerenzer

Hoffrage

(1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684–704.

11.

Griffin

D. W.

Gonzalez

Koehler

D. J.

Gilovich

(2012). Judgmental heuristics: A historical overview. In Holyoak

K. J.

Morrison

R. G.

(Eds.), Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 322–345). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

12.

Griffiths

T. L.

Tenenbaum

J. B.

(2006). Optimal predictions in everyday cognition. Psychological Science, 17, 767–773. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01780.x

13.

Hamlin

J. K.

Wynn

(2012). Who knows what’s good to eat? Infants fail to match the food preferences of antisocial others. Cognitive Development, 27, 227–239. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.05.005

14.

Hanson

W. A.

Putler

D. S.

(1996). Hits and misses: Herd behavior and online product popularity. Marketing Letters, 7, 297–305.

15.

Heyes

C. M.

Galef

B. G.

Jr . (1996). Social learning in animals: The roots of culture. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

16.

Kahneman

(2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

17.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.

18.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237–251.

19.

Kirkpatrick

L. A.

Epstein

(1992). Cognitive-experiential self-theory and subjective probability: Further evidence for two conceptual systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 534–544. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.534

20.

McAuley

Pandey

Leskovec

(2015). Inferring networks of substitutable and complementary products. In Proceedings of the 21th [sic] ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785–794). New York, NY: ACM.

21.

McAuley

Targett

Shi

van den Hengel

(2015). Image-based recommendations on styles and substitutes. In SIGIR 2015: Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 43–52). New York, NY: ACM.

22.

Meehl

P. E.

(1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

23.

Oppenheimer

D. M.

LeBoeuf

R. A.

Brewer

N. T.

(2008). Anchors aweigh: A demonstration of cross-modality anchoring and magnitude priming. Cognition, 106, 13–26. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.008

24.

Reyna

V. F.

Brainerd

C. J.

(2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 89–107. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011

25.

Salganik

M. J.

Dodds

P. S.

Watts

D. J.

(2006). Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science, 311, 854–856. doi:10.1126/science.1121066

26.

Shutts

Kinzler

McKee

K. B.

Spelke

E. S.

(2009). Social information guides infants’ selection of foods. Journal of Cognition and Development, 10, 1–17.

27.

Smith

A. R.

Price

P. C.

(2010). Sample size bias in the estimation of means. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 499–503. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.4.499

28.

Tomasello

(2004). Learning through others. Daedalus, 133(1), 51–58. doi:10.1162/001152604772746693

29.

Tversky

Kahneman

(1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 105–110.

30.

Tenenbaum

J. B.

(2007). Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review, 114, 245–272. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.245

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.13 MB

The Love of Large Numbers: A Popularity Bias in Consumer Choice

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material