Incel Activity on Social Media Linked to Local Mating Ecology

Abstract

Young men with few prospects of attracting a mate have historically threatened the internal peace and stability of societies. In some contemporary societies, such involuntary celibate—or incel—men promote much online misogyny and perpetrate real-world violence. We tested the prediction that online incel activity arises via local real-world mating-market forces that affect relationship formation. From a database of 4 billion Twitter posts (2012–2018), we geolocated 321 million tweets to 582 commuting zones in the continental United States, of which 3,649 tweets used words peculiar to incels and 3,745 were about incels. We show that such tweets arise disproportionately within places where mating competition among men is likely to be high because of male-biased sex ratios, few single women, high income inequality, and small gender gaps in income. Our results suggest a role for social media in monitoring and mitigating factors that lead young men toward antisocial behavior in real-world societies.

Keywords

evolutionary psychology human mate selection male–female relations sex-role attitudes socioeconomic status misogyny cyberhate inequality open data

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Autor

Dorn

Hanson

(2019). When work disappears: Manufacturing decline and the falling marriage-market value of young men. American Economic Review: Insights, 1, 161–178. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23173

Baumeister

R. F.

Vohs

K. D.

(2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 339–363. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_2

Becker

G. S.

(1981). A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press.

Bergstrom

T. C.

(1996). Economics in a family way. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(4), 1903–1934.

Bertrand

Pan

Kamenica

(2013). Gender identity and relative income within households. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130, 571–614.

Betzig

(1994). Sex, succession, and stratification in the first six civilizations. In Ellis

(Ed.), Social stratification and socioeconomic inequality (pp. 37–74). Praeger.

Blake

K. R.

Bastian

Denson

T. F.

Grosjean

Brooks

R. C.

(2018). Income inequality not gender inequality positively covaries with female sexualization on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115(35), 8722–8727. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717959115

Blake

K. R.

Brooks

R. C.

(2019). Income inequality and reproductive competition: Implications for consumption, status-seeking, and women’s self-sexualization. In Jetten

Peters

(Eds.), The social psychology of inequality (pp. 173–185). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_11

Blake

K. R.

O’Dean

Lian

Denson

T. F.

(2020). Misogynistic tweets correlate with and prospectively predict domestic violence incidents over time. Psychological Science, 32(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620968529

10.

Blumer

(1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. The Pacific Sociological Review, 1, 3–7.

11.

Bosson

J. K.

Prewitt-Freilino

J. L.

Taylor

J. N.

(2005). Role rigidity: A problem of identity misclassification? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 552–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.552

12.

Brooks

(2021). Artificial intimacy: Virtual friends, digital lovers and algorithmic matchmakers. Columbia University Press.

13.

Cai

Landon

(2019, April 3). Attacks by white extremists are growing. So are their connections. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/03/world/white-extremist-terrorism-christchurch.html

14.

Cashdan

(1993). Attracting mates: Effects of paternal investment on mate attraction strategies. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(93)90014-9

15.

Chiappori

P. A.

Fortin

Lacroix

(2002). Marriage market, divorce legislation, and household labor supply. Journal of Political Economy, 110(1), 37–72. https://doi.org/10.1086/324385

16.

Cronk

(1991). Wealth, status, and reproductive success among the Mukogodo of Kenya. American Anthropologist, 93(2), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1991.93.2.02a00040

17.

Daly

(2016). Killing the competition: Economic inequality and homicide. Transaction Publishers.

18.

Edlund

Zhang

(2013). Sex ratios and crime: Evidence from China. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 1520–1534.

19.

Ging

(2019). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184x17706401

20.

Griskevicius

Tybur

J. M.

Ackerman

J. M.

Delton

A. W.

Robertson

T. E.

White

A. E.

(2012). The financial consequences of too many men: Sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024761

21.

Guttentag

Secord

P. F.

(1983). Too many women? The sex ratio question. SAGE.

22.

Hopcroft

R. L.

(2006). Sex, status, and reproductive success in the contemporary United States. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(2), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.004

23.

Hudson

V. M.

den Boer

A. M.

(2004). Bare branches: The security implications of Asia’s surplus male population. MIT Press.

24.

Hudson

V. M.

Matfess

(2017). In plain sight: The neglected linkage between brideprice and violent conflict. International Security, 42, 7–40. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00289

25.

Jane

E. A.

(2017). Misogyny online: A short (and brutish) history. SAGE.

26.

Kenrick

D. T.

Griskevicius

Neuberg

S. L.

Schaller

(2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 292–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369469

27.

Krahn

Hatnagel

T. F.

Gartrell

J. W.

(1986). Income inequality and homicide rates: Cross-national data and criminological theories. Criminology, 24(2), 269–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1986.tb01496.x

28.

Maass

Cadinu

Guarnieri

Grasselli

(2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 853–870. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.853

29.

Nettle

Pollet

T. V.

(2008). Natural selection on male wealth in humans. American Naturalist, 172(5), 658–666. https://doi.org/10.1086/591690

30.

Noë

Hammerstein

(1994). Biological markets: Supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 35(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167053

31.

Nychka

Furrer

Paige

Sain

Gerber

Iverson

(2021). fields (Version 13.3) [Computer software]. https://github.com/dnychka/fieldsRPackage

32.

Oishi

(2014). Socioecological psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 581–609. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-030413-152156

33.

Oliveira Ramos

Daly

Seidl-de-Moura

M. L.

Nadanovsky

(2017). The role of city income inequality, sex ratio and youth mortality rates in the effect of violent victimization on health-risk behaviors in Brazilian adolescents. Social Science & Medicine, 181, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.057

34.

O’Malley

R. L.

Holt

T. J.

(2020). An exploration of the involuntary celibate (incel) subculture online. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520959625

35.

Scaptura

M. N.

Boyle

K. M.

(2020). Masculinity threat, “incel” traits, and violent fantasies among heterosexual men in the United States. Feminist Criminology, 15(3), 278–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085119896415

36.

Schacht

Borgerhoff Mulder

(2015). Sex ratio effects on reproductive strategies in humans. Royal Society Open Science, 2(1). Article 140402. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140402

37.

Schacht

Rauch

K. L.

Borgerhoff Mulder

(2014). Too many men: The violence problem? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29(4), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.02.001

38.

Stone

E. A.

(2019). Does mate scarcity affect marital choice and family formation? The evidence for new and classic formulations of sex ratio theory. Marriage & Family Review, 55(5), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2018.1501789

39.

Tolbert

C. M.

Sizer

(1996). US commuting zones and labor market areas: A 1990 update (No. 9614). Economic Research Service, Rural Economy Division. https://usa.ipums.org/usa/resources/volii/cmz90.pdf

40.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Income inequality measures by county: 1990, 2000. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial/tables/time-series/historical-income-counties/county5.xls

41.

U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2019, March 26). Commuting zones and labor market areas. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/commuting-zones-and-labor-market-areas/

42.

Van Valkenburgh

S. P.

(2021). Digesting the red pill: Masculinity and neoliberalism in the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 24(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184x18816118

43.

von Rueden

C. R.

Jaeggi

A. V.

(2016). Men’s status and reproductive success in 33 nonindustrial societies: Effects of subsistence, marriage system, and reproductive strategy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113(39), 10824–10829. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606800113

44.

Wilson

Daly

(1985). Competitiveness, risk-taking, and violence: The young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6(1), 59–73.

45.

Wilson

Daly

(1997). Life expectancy, economic inequality, homicide, and reproductive timing in Chicago neighbourhoods. BMJ, 314(7089), Article 1271. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7089.1271

46.

Wilson

W. J.

(1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. Alfred A. Knopf.

47.

Zhou

Hesketh

(2017). High sex ratios in rural China: Declining well-being with age in never-married men. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372(1729), Article 20160324. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0324

48.

Zhu

W. X.

Hesketh

(2009). China’s excess males, sex selective abortion, and one child policy: Analysis of data from 2005 national intercensus survey. BMJ, 338, Article b1211. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1211

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB