Past research shows that men respond to women differently depending on where women are in their ovulatory cycle. But what leads men to treat ovulating women differently? We propose that the ovulatory cycle alters women’s flirting behavior. We tested this hypothesis in an experiment in which women interacted with different types of men at different points in their cycle. Results revealed that women in the ovulatory phase reported more interest in men who had purported markers of genetic fitness as short-term mates, but not as long-term mates. Furthermore, behavioral ratings of the interactions indicated that women displayed more flirting behaviors when they were at high than at low fertility. Importantly, fertile women flirted more only when interacting with men who had genetic-fitness markers, not with other men. In summary, fertility not only alters women’s behavior but does so in a context-dependent way that follows adaptive logic.
AndersonU. S.PereaE. F.BeckerD. V.AckermanJ. M.ShapiroJ. R.NeubergS. L.KenrickD. T. (2010). I only have eyes for you: Ovulation redirects attention (but not memory) to attractive men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 804–808. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.015
2.
BryantG. A.HaseltonM. G. (2009). Vocal cues of ovulation in human females. Biology Letters, 5, 12–15. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0507
3.
CampbellW. K.FosterC. A.FinkelE. J. (2002). Does self-love lead to love for others?: A story of narcissistic game playing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 340–354. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.340
4.
DuranteK. M.GriskeviciusV.HillS. E.PerillouxC.LiN. P. (2011). Ovulation, competition, and product choice: Hormonal influences on consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 921–934.
5.
DuranteK. M.GriskeviciusV.SimpsonJ. A.CantúS. M.TyburJ. M. (2012). Sex ratio and women’s career choice: Does a scarcity of men lead women to choose briefcase over baby?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 121–134. doi:10.1037/a0027949
6.
DuranteK. M.LiN. P.HaseltonM. G. (2008). Changes in women’s choice of dress across the ovulatory cycle: Naturalistic and experimental evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1451–1460. doi:10.1177/0146167208323103
7.
Eibl-EibesfeldtI. (1989). Human ethology. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
8.
FeinbergD. R.JonesB. C.SmithM. J. L.MooreF. R.DeBruineL. M.CornwellR. E. . . . PerrettD. I. (2006). Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 215–222. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.07.004
9.
GangestadS. W.Garver-ApgarC. E.SimpsonJ. A.CousinsA. J. (2007). Changes in women’s mate preferences across the ovulatory cycle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 151–163. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.151
10.
GangestadS. W.SimpsonJ. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 573–587. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0000337X
11.
GangestadS. W.SimpsonJ. A.CousinsA. J.Garver-ApgarC. E.ChristensenP. N. (2004). Women’s preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 15, 203–207. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.01503010.x
12.
GangestadS. W.ThornhillR.GarverC. E. (2002). Changes in women’s sexual interests and their partner’s mate-retention tactics across the menstrual cycle: Evidence for shifting conflicts of interest. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 269, 975–982. doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1952
13.
GangestadS. W.ThornhillR.Garver-ApgarC. E. (2005). Women’s sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272, 2023–2027. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3112
14.
Garver-ApgarC. E.GangestadS. W.ThornhillR.MillerR. D.OlpJ. J. (2006). Major histocompatibility complex alleles, sexual responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychological Science, 17, 830–835. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01789.x
15.
GrammerK. (1990). Strangers meet: Laughter and nonverbal signs of interest in opposite-sex encounters. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 209–236. doi:10.1007/BF00989317
16.
GrammerK.KruckK.JuetteA.FinkB. (2000). Non-verbal behavior as courtship signals: The role of control and choice in selecting partners. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 371–390. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00053-2
17.
GuéguenN. (2009). Menstrual cycle phases and female receptivity to a courtship solicitation: An evaluation in a nightclub. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 351–355.
18.
GuéguenN. (2012). Gait and menstrual cycle: Ovulating women use sexier gaits and walk slowly ahead of men. Gait & Posture, 35, 621–624. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.011
19.
HaseltonM. G.GangestadS. W. (2006). Conditional expression of women’s desires and men’s mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 509–518. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.10.006
20.
HaseltonM. G.GildersleeveK. (2011). Can men detect ovulation?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 87–92. doi:10.1177/0963721411402668
21.
HaseltonM. G.MortezaieM.PillsworthE. G.Bleske-RechekA.FrederickD. A. (2007). Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation: Near ovulation, women dress to impress. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 40–45. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.07.007
22.
JesserC. J. (1978). Male responses to direct verbal sexual initiatives of females. Journal of Sex Research, 14, 118–128.
23.
JonesB. C.DeBruineL. M.PerrettD. I.LittleA. C.FeinbergD. R.SmithM. J. L. (2008). Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 78–84. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9268-y
24.
LaengB.FalkenbergL. (2007). Women’s pupillary responses to sexually significant others during the hormonal cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 52, 520–530. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.07.013
25.
MacKinnonD. P.FairchildA. J. (2009). Current directions in mediation analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 16–20. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01598.x
26.
MillerG.TyburJ. M.JordanB. D. (2007). Ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by lap dancers: Economic evidence for human estrus?Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 375–381. doi:10.1016.j.evolhumbehav.2007.06.002
27.
MillerS. L.ManerJ. K. (2010). Scent of a woman: Men’s testosterone responses to olfactory ovulation cues. Psychological Science, 21, 276–283. doi:10.1177/0956797609357733
28.
MooreM. M. (1985). Nonverbal courtship patterns in women: Context and consequences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6, 237–247. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(85)90016-0
29.
MuehlenhardC. L.KoralewskiM. A.AndrewsS. L.BurdickC. A. (1986). Verbal and nonverbal cues that convey interest in dating: Two studies. Behavior Therapy, 17, 404–419. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(86)80071-5
30.
PaulhusD. L.WilliamsK. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
PillsworthE. G.HaseltonM. G. (2006). Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 247–258. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.10.002
33.
PillsworthE. G.HaseltonM. G.BussD. M. (2004). Ovulatory shifts in female sexual desire. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 55–65. doi:10.1080/00224490409552213
34.
PipitoneR. N.GallupG. G. (2008). Women’s voice attractiveness varies across the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 268–274. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.02.001
35.
PreacherK. J.ZyphurM. J.ZhangZ. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209–233. doi:10.1037/a0020141
36.
RobertsS. C.HavlicekJ.FlegrJ.HruskovaM.LittleA. C.JonesB. C. . . . PetrieM. (2004). Female facial attractiveness increases during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271(Suppl. 5), S270–S272. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.017
37.
SchmittD. P. (2005). Fundamentals of human mating strategies. In BussD. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 258–291). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
38.
SimpsonJ. A.GangestadS. W. (1992). Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice. Journal of Personality, 60, 31–51. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00264.x
39.
SimpsonJ. A.GangestadS. W.BiekM. (1993). Personality and nonverbal social behavior: An ethological perspective of relationship initiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 434–461. doi:10.1006/jesp.1993.1020
40.
ThornhillR.GangestadS. W. (2008). The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
41.
ThornhillR.GangestadS. W.MillerR.ScheydG.McColloughJ. K.FranklinM. (2003). Major histocompatibility complex genes, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 668–678. doi:10.1093/beheco/arg043
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
