Disparities in home numeracy environments contribute to variations in children’s mathematical skills. However, the neural mechanisms underlying the relation between home numeracy experiences and mathematical learning are unknown. Here, parents of 66 eight-year-olds completed a questionnaire assessing the frequency of home numeracy practices. Neural adaptation to the repetition of Arabic numerals and words was measured in children using functional MRI (n = 50) to assess how sensitive the brain is to the presentation of numerical and nonnumerical information. Disparities in home numeracy practices were related to differences in digit (but not word) processing in a region of the left intraparietal sulcus (IPS) that was also related to children’s arithmetic fluency. Furthermore, digit-related processing in the IPS influenced the relation between home numeracy practices and arithmetic fluency. Results were consistent with a model hypothesizing that home numeracy practices may affect children’s mathematical skills by modulating the IPS response to symbolic numerical information.
AmalricM.DehaeneS. (2016). Origins of the brain networks for advanced mathematics in expert mathematicians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113(18), 4909–4917. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603205113
2.
ArsalidouM.Pawliw-LevacM.SadeghiM.Pascual-LeoneJ. (2018). Brain areas associated with numbers and calculations in children: Meta-analyses of fMRI studies. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 30, 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.08.002
3.
BennettC. M.MillerM. B. (2013). fMRI reliability: Influences of task and experimental design. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13(4), 690–702. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0195-1
4.
BugdenS.PriceG. R.McLeanD. A.AnsariD. (2012). The role of the left intraparietal sulcus in the relationship between symbolic number processing and children’s arithmetic competence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(4), 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2012.04.001
5.
ChenQ.LiJ. (2014). Association between individual differences in non-symbolic number acuity and math performance: A meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica, 148, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.016
6.
ChurchJ. A.PetersenS. E.SchlaggarB. L. (2010). The “Task B problem” and other considerations in developmental functional neuroimaging. Human Brain Mapping, 31(6), 852–862. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21036
7.
CognetG. (2006). NEMI-2: Nouvelle Echelle Métrique de l’Intelligence-2 [New Metric Scale of Intelligence-2]. Éditions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée (ECPA).
8.
CoxR. W.ChenG.GlenD. R.ReynoldsR. C.TaylorP. A. (2017). fMRI clustering and false-positive rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114(17), E3370–E3371. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614961114
Demir-LiraÖ. E.PradoJ.BoothJ. R. (2015). Parental socioeconomic status and the neural basis of arithmetic: Differential relations to verbal and visuo-spatial representations. Developmental Science, 18(5), 799–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12268
11.
Demir-LiraÖ. E.PradoJ.BoothJ. R. (2016). Neural correlates of math gains vary depending on parental socioeconomic status (SES). Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 892. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00892
12.
De SmedtB.NoëlM.-P.GilmoreC.AnsariD. (2013). How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children’s mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2(2), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.001
13.
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.PaganiL. S.FeinsteinL.EngelM.Brooks-GunnJ.SextonH.DuckworthK.JapelC. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
14.
DunstC. J.HambyD. W.WilkieH.DunstK. S. (2017). Meta-analysis of the relationship between home and family experiences and young children’s early numeracy learning. In PhillipsonS.GervasoniA.SullivanP. (Eds.), Engaging families as children’s first mathematics educators: International perspectives (pp. 105–125). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2553-2_7
15.
EickhoffS. B.StephanK. E.MohlbergH.GrefkesC.FinkG. R.AmuntsK.ZillesK. (2005). A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. NeuroImage, 25(4), 1325–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.034
16.
EklundA.NicholsT. E.KnutssonH. (2016). Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113(28), 7900–7905. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602413113
17.
ElliottL.BachmanH. J. (2018). How do parents foster young children’s math skills?Child Development Perspectives, 12(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12249
FiedlerK.HarrisC.SchottM. (2018). Unwarranted inferences from statistical mediation tests: An analysis of articles published in 2015. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 75, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.11.008
20.
GibsonD. J.GundersonE. A.LevineS. C. (2020). Causal effects of parent number talk on preschoolers’ number knowledge. Child Development, 91(6), e1162–e1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13423
21.
GirardC.BastelicaT.LéoneJ.Epinat-DuclosJ.LongoL.PradoJ. (2021). The relation between home numeracy practices and a variety of math skills in elementary school children. PLOS ONE, 16(9), Article e0255400. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255400
22.
Grill-SpectorK.MalachR. (2001). fMR-adaptation: A tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychologica, 107(1–3), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-6918(01)00019-1
23.
HartS. A.LittleC.van BergenE. (2021). Nurture might be nature: Cautionary tales and proposed solutions. npj Science of Learning, 6(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-020-00079-z
24.
HayesA. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
25.
LeFevreJ. A.SkwarchukS.-L.Smith-ChantB.FastL.KamawarD.BisanzJ. (2009). Home numeracy experiences and children’s math performance in the early school years. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014532
26.
LunaB.VelanovaK.GeierC. F. (2010). Methodological approaches in developmental neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 31(6), 863–871. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21073
27.
MarekS.Tervo-ClemmensB.CalabroF. J.MontezD. F.KayB. P.HatoumA. S.DonohueM. R.ForanW.MillerR. L.FeczkoE.Miranda-DominguezO.GrahamA. M.EarlE. A.PerroneA. J.CordovaM.DoyleO.MooreL. A.ConanG.UriarteJ.. . . DosenbachN. U. F. (2020). Towards reproducible brain-wide association studies. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.21.257758
28.
MazaikaP. K.HoeftF.GloverG. H.ReissA. L. (2009). Methods and software for fMRI analysis for clinical subjects. NeuroImage, 47 (Supp. 1), S58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(09)70238-1
29.
MerzE. C.MaskusE. A.MelvinS. A.HeX.NobleK. G. (2020). Socioeconomic disparities in language input are associated with children’s language-related brain structure and reading skills. Child Development, 91(3), 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13239
30.
MerzE. C.WiltshireC. A.NobleK. G. (2019). Socioeconomic inequality and the developing brain: Spotlight on language and executive function. Child Development Perspectives, 13(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12305
31.
Mutaf-YıldızB.SasanguieD.De SmedtB.ReynvoetB. (2020). Probing the relationship between home numeracy and children’s mathematical skills: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 2074. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02074
32.
NeeD. E. (2019). fMRI replicability depends upon sufficient individual-level data. Communications Biology, 2, Article 130. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-019-0378-6
PeirceJ.GrayJ. R.SimpsonS.MacAskillM.HöchenbergerR.SogoH.KastmanE.LindeløvJ. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
36.
PerrachioneT. K.Del TufoS. N.WinterR.MurtaghJ.CyrA.ChangP.HalversonK.GhoshS. S.ChristodoulouJ. A.GabrieliJ. D. E. (2016). Dysfunction of rapid neural adaptation in dyslexia. Neuron, 92(6), 1383–1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.020
37.
PriceG. R.MazzoccoM. M. M.AnsariD. (2013). Why mental arithmetic counts: Brain activation during single digit arithmetic predicts high school math scores. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(1), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2936-12.2013
38.
RaschleN.ZukJ.Ortiz-MantillaS.SlivaD. D.FranceschiA.GrantP. E.BenasichA. A.GaabN. (2012). Pediatric neuroimaging in early childhood and infancy: Challenges and practical guidelines. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1252, 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06457.x
39.
RobinM. (2019). More people live in a median household in the western regions. In Insee Focus (No. 148). Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques.
40.
RomeoR. R.LeonardJ. A.RobinsonS. T.WestM. R.MackeyA. P.RoweM. L.GabrieliJ. D. E. (2018). Beyond the 30-million-word gap: Children’s conversational exposure is associated with language-related brain function. Psychological Science, 29(5), 700–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617742725
41.
SchwartzF.Epinat-DuclosJ.LéoneJ.PoissonA.PradoJ. (2018). Impaired neural processing of transitive relations in children with math learning difficulty. NeuroImage: Clinical, 20, 1255–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.10.020
42.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
43.
SokolowskiH. M.AnsariD. (2018). Understanding the effects of education through the lens of biology. npj Science of Learning, 3, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0032-y
WilkeyE. D.AnsariD. (2020). Challenging the neurobiological link between number sense and symbolic numerical abilities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1464(1), 76–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14225
47.
WoodcockT. A.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Riverside Publishing.
48.
ZamarianL.IschebeckA.DelazerM. (2009). Neuroscience of learning arithmetic—Evidence from brain imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(6), 909–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.005
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
