The COVID-19 pandemic is creating unprecedented, sustained, and unavoidable stress for the entire population, and older people are facing particularly heightened risk of contracting the virus and suffering severe complications, including death. The present study was conducted when the pandemic was spreading exponentially in the United States. To address important theoretical questions about age differences in emotional experience in times of crisis, we surveyed a representative sample of 945 Americans between the ages of 18 and 76 years and assessed the frequency and intensity of a range of positive and negative emotions. We also assessed perceived risk of contagion and complications from the virus, as well as personality, health, and demographic characteristics. Age was associated with relatively greater emotional well-being both when analyses did and did not control for perceived risk and other covariates. The present findings extend previous research about age and emotion by demonstrating that older adults’ relatively better emotional well-being persists even in the face of prolonged stress.
AllardE. S.WadlingerH. A.IsaacowitzD. M. (2010). Positive gaze preferences in older adults: Assessing the role of cognitive effort with pupil dilation. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 17, 296–311. doi:10.1080/13825580903265681
2.
BairdB. M.LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2010). Life satisfaction across the lifespan: Findings from two nationally representative panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 99, 183–203. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9584-9
3.
BarberS. J.LopezN.CadambiK.AlferezS. (2020). The limited roles of cognitive capabilities and future time perspective in contributing to positivity effects. Cognition, 200, Article 104267. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104267
4.
BarberS. J.OpitzP. C.MartinsB.SakakiM.MatherM. (2016). Thinking about a limited future enhances the positivity of younger and older adults’ recall: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Memory and Cognition, 44, 869–882. doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0612-0
5.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
6.
BirdittK. S. (2014). Age differences in emotional reactions to daily negative social encounters. The Journals of Gerontology B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69, 557–566. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbt045
7.
BlanchflowerD. G.OswaldA. J. (2008). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle?Social Science and Medicine, 66, 1733–1749. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.030
8.
BrydgesC. R. (2019). Effect size guidelines, sample size calculations, and statistical power in gerontology. Innovation in Aging, 3, Article igz036. doi:10.1093/geroni/igz036
BurrD. A.CastrellonJ. J.ZaldD. H.Samanez-LarkinG. R. (2020). Emotion dynamics across adulthood in everyday life: Older adults are more emotionally stable and better at regulating desires. Emotion. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/emo0000734
11.
CarstensenL. L. (1993). Motivation for social contact across the life span: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. In JacobsJ. E. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Developmental perspectives on motivation (Vol. 40, pp. 209–254). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
12.
CarstensenL. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913–1915. doi:10.1126/science.1127488
13.
CarstensenL. L.IsaacowitzD.CharlesS. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.54.3.165
14.
CarstensenL. L.LangF. R. (1996). Future Time Perspective scale [Unpublished manuscript]. Department of Psychology, Stanford University.
15.
CarstensenL. L.PasupathiM.MayrU.NesselroadeJ. R. (2000). Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 644–655. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.644
16.
CarstensenL. L.TuranB.ScheibeS.RamN.Ersner-HershfieldH.Samanez-LarkinG. R.. . . NesselroadeJ. R. (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26, 21–33. doi:10.1037/a0021285
17.
CharlesS. T. (2010). Strength and vulnerability integration: A model of emotional well-being across adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1068–1091. doi:10.1037/a0021232
18.
CharlesS. T.MatherM.CarstensenL. L. (2003). Aging and emotional memory: The forgettable nature of negative images for older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 310–324. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.310
19.
CharlesS. T.PiazzaJ. R.LuongG.AlmeidaD. M. (2009). Now you see it, now you don’t: Age differences in affective reactivity to social tensions. Psychology and Aging, 24, 645–653. doi:10.1037/a0016673
20.
EldesoukyL.EnglishT. (2018). Another year older, another year wiser? Emotion regulation strategy selection and flexibility across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 33, 572–585. doi:10.1037/pag0000251
21.
FredricksonB. L.CarstensenL. L. (1990). Choosing social partners: How old age and anticipated endings make people more selective. Psychology and Aging, 5, 335–347. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.5.3.335
22.
FungH. H.CarstensenL. L. (2004). Motivational changes in response to blocked goals and foreshortened time: Testing alternatives to socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 19, 68–78. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.68
23.
FungH. H.CarstensenL. L. (2006). Goals change when life’s fragility is primed: Lessons learned from older adults, the September 11 attacks and SARS. Social Cognition, 24, 248–278. doi:10.1521/soco.2006.24.3.248
24.
GalambosN. L.KrahnH. J.JohnsonM. D.LachmanM. E. (2020). The U shape of happiness across the life course: Expanding the discussion. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15, 898–912. doi:10.1177/1745691620902428
25.
GerstorfD.RamN.RockeC.LindenbergerU.SmithJ. (2008). Decline in life satisfaction in old age: Longitudinal evidence for links to distance-to-death. Psychology and Aging, 23, 154–168. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.154
26.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
27.
GrossJ. J.CarstensenL. L.PasupathiM.TsaiJ.SkorpenC. G.HsuA. Y. (1997). Emotion and aging: Experience, expression, and control. Psychology and Aging, 12, 590–599. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.12.4.590
28.
GrühnD.SharifianN.ChuQ. (2016). The limits of a limited future time perspective in explaining age differences in emotional functioning. Psychology and Aging, 31, 583–593. doi:10.1037/pag0000060
29.
HartS. L.CharlesS. T. (2013). Age-related patterns in negative affect and appraisals about colorectal cancer over time. Health Psychology, 32, 302–310. doi:10.1037/a0028523
KatanaM.HillP. L. (2020). Affective aging on different time-scales. In HillP. L.AllemandM. (Eds.), Personality and healthy aging in adulthood (pp. 63–74). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
32.
KooijD.KanferR.BettsM.RudolphC. W. (2018). Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 867–893. doi:10.1037/apl0000306
33.
MatherM. (2012). The emotion paradox in the aging brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1251, 33–49. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06471.x
34.
MatherM.CarstensenL. L. (2005). Aging and motivated cognition: The positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 496–502. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005
35.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
36.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
37.
ReedA. E.ChanL.MikelsJ. A. (2014). Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: Age differences in preferences for positive over negative information. Psychology and Aging, 29, 1–15. doi:10.1037/a0035194
38.
RohrM. K.JohnD. T.FungH. H.LangF. R. (2017). A three-component model of future time perspective across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 32, 597–607. doi:10.1037/pag0000191
39.
StoneA. A.SchwartzJ. E.BroderickJ. E.DeatonA. (2010). A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 9985–9990. doi:10.1073/pnas.1003744107
40.
StroughJ.BruinedeBruinW.ParkerA. M.LemasterP.PichayayothinN.DelaneyR. (2016). Hour glass half full or half empty? Future time perspective and preoccupation with negative events across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 31, 558–573. doi:10.1037/pag0000097
WareJ.SherbourneC. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.
45.
WrzusC.MüllerV.WagnerG. G.LindenbergerU.RiedigerM. (2014). Affect dynamics across the lifespan: With age, heart rate reacts less strongly, but recovers more slowly from unpleasant emotional situations. Psychology and Aging, 29, 563–576. doi:10.1037/a0037451
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
