Fake-news exposure can cause misinformation to be mistakenly remembered and believed. In two experiments (Ns = 96), we examined whether reminders of misinformation could improve memory for and beliefs in corrections. Subjects read factual statements and misinformation statements taken from news websites and then read statements that corrected the misinformation. Misinformation reminders appeared before some corrections but not others. Subjects then attempted to recall facts, indicated their belief in those recalls, and indicated whether they remembered corrections and misinformation. In Experiment 1, we did not constrain subjects’ report criteria. But in Experiment 2, we encouraged conservative reporting by instructing subjects to report only information they believed to be true. Reminders increased recall and belief accuracy. These benefits were greater both when misinformation was recollected and when subjects remembered that corrections had occurred. These findings demonstrate one situation in which misinformation reminders can diminish the negative effects of fake-news exposure in the short term.
BaconF. T. (1979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 241–252. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.241
2.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
3.
BeggI. M.AnasA.FarinacciS. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 446–458. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.446
4.
BrydgesC. R.GignacG. E.EckerU. K. H. (2018). Working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, and the continued influence effect: A latent-variable analysis. Intelligence, 69, 117–122. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2018.03.009
5.
DechêneA.StahlC.HansenJ.WänkeM. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 238–257. doi:10.1177/1088868309352251
6.
EckerU. K. H.AngL. C. (2019). Political attitudes and the processing of misinformation corrections. Political Psychology, 40, 241–260. doi:10.1111/pops.12494
7.
EckerU. K. H.HoganJ. L.LewandowskyS. (2017). Reminders and repetition of misinformation: Helping or hindering its correction?Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6, 185–192. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.014
8.
EckerU. K. H.LewandowskyS.TangD. T. W. (2010). Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 38, 1087–1100. doi:10.3758/MC.38.8.1087
9.
FoxJ.WeisbergS. (2019). An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: SAGE.
10.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
11.
HasherL.GoldsteinD.ToppinoT. (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 107–112. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80012-1
12.
JacobyL. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513–541. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F
13.
JacobyL. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 3–22. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.3
14.
JacobyL. L.WahlheimC. N.KelleyC. M. (2015). Memory consequences of looking back to notice change: Retroactive and proactive facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1282–1297. doi:10.1037/xlm0000123
15.
JohnsonH. M.SeifertC. M. (1998). Updating accounts following a correction of misinformation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1483–1494. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.6.1483
16.
JohnsonM. K.HashtroudiS.LindsayD. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.
17.
KendeouP.WalshE. K.SmithE. R.O’BrienE. J. (2014). Knowledge revision processes in refutation texts. Discourse Processes, 51, 374–397. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2014.913961
18.
LarsonH. J.CooperL. Z.EskolaJ.KatzS. L.RatzanS. (2011). Addressing the vaccine confidence gap. The Lancet, 378, 526–535. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60678-8
19.
LenthR. (2019). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means (R Package Version 1.4.7) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
20.
LewandowskyS.EckerU. K. H.SeifertC. M.SchwarzN.CookJ. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106–131. doi:10.1177/1529100612451018
21.
MorrowD. G.BowerG. H.GreenspanS. L. (1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 292–312. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90035-1
22.
PennycookG.CannonT. D.RandD. G. (2018). Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 1865–1880. doi:10.1037/xge0000465
23.
PeterC.KochT. (2016). When debunking scientific myths fails (and when it does not): The backfire effect in the context of journalistic coverage and immediate judgments as prevention strategy. Science Communication, 38, 3–25. doi:10.1177/1075547015613523
24.
PolandG. A.SpierR. (2010). Fear, misinformation, and innumerates: How the Wakefield paper, the press, and advocacy groups damaged the public health. Vaccine, 28, 2361–2362. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.052
25.
PutnamA. L.WahlheimC. N.JacobyL. L. (2014). Memory for flip-flopping: Detection and recollection of political contradictions. Memory & Cognition, 42, 1198–1210. doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0419-9
26.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
SchwarzN.NewmanE.LeachW. (2016). Making the truth stick & the myths fade: Lessons from cognitive psychology. Behavioral Science & Policy, 2(1), 85–95.
29.
SchwarzN.SannaL. J.SkurnikI.YoonC. (2007). Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: Implications for debiasing and public information campaigns. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 127–161). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39003-X
30.
SeifertC. M. (2002). The continued influence of misinformation in memory: What makes a correction effective? In RossB. H. (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 41, pp. 265–292). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31.
SinclairA. H.StanleyM. L.SeliP. (2020). Closed-minded cognition: Right-wing authoritarianism is negatively related to belief updating following prediction error. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01767-y
32.
SkurnikI.YoonC.ParkD. C.SchwarzN. (2005). How warnings about false claims become recommendations. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 713–724. doi:10.1086/426605
33.
StadtlerM.ScharrerL.BrummernhenrichB.BrommeR. (2013). Dealing with uncertainty: Readers’ memory for and use of conflicting information from science texts as function of presentation format and source expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 130–150. doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.769996
34.
SwireB.EckerU. K. H.LewandowskyS. (2017). The role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 1948–1961. doi:10.1037/xlm0000422
35.
WahlheimC. N.JacobyL. L. (2013). Remembering change: The critical role of recursive remindings in proactive effects of memory. Memory & Cognition, 41, 1–15. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0246-9
36.
WahlheimC. N.SmithW. G.DelaneyP. F. (2019). Reminders can enhance or impair episodic memory updating: A memory-for-change perspective. Memory, 27, 849–867. doi:10.1080/09658211.2019.1582677
37.
WahlheimC. N.ZacksJ. M. (2019). Memory guides the processing of event changes for older and younger adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 30–50. doi:10.1037/xge0000458
38.
WeaverK.GarciaS. M.SchwarzN.MillerD. T. (2007). Inferring the popularity of an opinion from its familiarity: A repetitive voice can sound like a chorus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 821–833. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.821
39.
WilkesA. L.LeatherbarrowM. (1988). Editing episodic memory following the identification of error. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 40, 361–387. doi:10.1080/02724988843000168
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
