Factor analyses suggest that impulsivity traits that capture tendencies to act prematurely or take risks tap partially distinct constructs. We applied genomic structure equation modeling to evaluate the genetic factor structure of two well-established impulsivity questionnaires, using published statistics from genome-wide association studies of up to 22,861 participants. We also tested the hypotheses that delay discounting would be genetically separable from other impulsivity factors and that emotionally triggered facets of impulsivity (urgency) would be those most strongly genetically correlated with an internalizing latent factor. A five-factor model best fitted the impulsivity data. Delay discounting was genetically distinct from these five factors. As expected, the two urgency subscales were most strongly related to an internalizing-psychopathology latent factor. These findings provide empirical genetic evidence that impulsivity can be broken down into distinct categories of differential relevance for internalizing psychopathology. They also demonstrate how measured genetic markers can be used to inform theories of psychology and personality.
BarrattE. S. (1993). Impulsivity: Integrating cognitive, behavioral, biological, and environmental data. In McCownW. G.JohnsonJ. L.ShureM. B. (Eds.), The impulsive client: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 39–56). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2.
BergJ. M.LatzmanR. D.BliwiseN. G.LilienfeldS. O. (2015). Parsing the heterogeneity of impulsivity: A meta-analytic review of the behavioral implications of the UPPS for psychopathology. Psychological Assessment, 27, 1129–1146. doi:10.1037/pas0000111
3.
BlockJ. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187–215. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187
4.
Bulik-SullivanB. K.LohP.-R.FinucaneH. K.RipkeS.YangJ., Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, . . . NealeB. M. (2015). LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nature Genetics, 47, 291–295. doi:10.1038/ng.3211
5.
CarverC. S.JohnsonS. L. (2018). Impulsive reactivity to emotion and vulnerability to psychopathology. American Psychologist, 73, 1067–1078. doi:10.1037/amp0000387
6.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5–13. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5
7.
CydersM. A.LittlefieldA. K.CoffeyS.KaryadiK. A. (2014). Examination of a short English version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 1372–1376. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.02.013
8.
CydersM. A.SmithG. T. (2007). Mood-based rash action and its components: Positive and negative urgency. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 839–850. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.008
9.
DalleyJ. W.EverittB. J.RobbinsT. W. (2011). Impulsivity, compulsivity, and top-down cognitive control. Neuron, 69, 680–694. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.01.020
10.
DuckworthA. L.KernM. L. (2011). A meta-analysis of the convergent validity of self-control measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 259–268. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.02.004
11.
EvendenJ. L. (1999). Varieties of impulsivity. Psychopharmacology, 146, 348–361. doi:10.1007/PL00005481
12.
EysenckH. J. (1993). The nature of impulsivity. In McCownW. G.JohnsonJ. L.ShureM. B. (Eds.), The impulsive client: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 57–69). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10500-004
13.
EysenckH. J.EysenckM. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science perspective. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
14.
FriedmanN. P.HatoumA. S.GustavsonD. E.CorleyR. P.HewittJ. K.YoungS. E. (2020). Executive functions and impulsivity are genetically distinct and independently predict psychopathology: Results from two adult twin studies. Clinical Psychological Science, 8, 519–538.
15.
GrotzingerA. D.RhemtullaM.de VlamingR.RitchieS. J.MallardT. T.HillW. D.. . . Tucker-DrobE. M. (2019). Genomic structural equation modelling provides insights into the multivariate genetic architecture of complex traits. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 513–525. doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0566-x
16.
GustavsonD. E.FranzC. E.KremenW. S.CarverC. S.CorleyR. P.HewittJ. K.FriedmanN. P. (2019). Common genetic influences on impulsivity facets are related to goal management, psychopathology, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 79, 161–175. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2019.03.009
17.
HowardD. M.AdamsM. J.ShiraliM.ClarkeT.-K.MarioniR. E.DaviesG.. . . McIntoshA. M. (2018). Genome-wide association study of depression phenotypes in UK Biobank identifies variants in excitatory synaptic pathways. Nature Communications, 9, Article 1470. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03819-3
18.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. doi:10.1037//1082-989x.3.4.424
19.
JohnsonS. L.CarverC. S.JoormannJ. (2013). Impulsive responses to emotion as a transdiagnostic vulnerability to internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Journal of Affective Disorders, 150, 872–878. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.004
20.
KirbyK. N.PetryN. M.BickelW. K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 78–87. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.1.78
21.
LittlefieldA. K.StevensA. K.EllingsonJ. M.KingK. M.JacksonK. M. (2016). Changes in negative urgency, positive urgency, and sensation seeking across adolescence. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 332–337. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.024
22.
LucianoM.HagenaarsS. P.DaviesG.HillW. D.ClarkeT. K.ShiraliM.. . . DearyI. J. (2018). Association analysis in over 329,000 individuals identifies 116 independent variants influencing neuroticism. Nature Genetics, 50, 6–11. doi:10.1038/s41588-017-0013-8
23.
LynamD. R.SmithG. T.WhitesideS. P.CydersM. A. (2006). The UPPS-P: Assessing five personality pathways to impulsive behavior. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
24.
MacKillopJ.WeaferJ. J. C. G.OshriA.PalmerA.de WitH. (2016). The latent structure of impulsivity: Impulsive choice, impulsive action, and impulsive personality traits. Psychopharmacology, 233, 3361–3370. doi:10.1007/s00213-016-4372-0
25.
MallardT. T.LinnérR. K.OkbayA.GrotzingerA. D.de VlamingR.MeddensS. F. W.. . . HardenK. P. (2019). Not just one p: Multivariate GWAS of psychiatric disorders and their cardinal symptoms reveal two dimensions of cross-cutting genetic liabilities. bioRxiv. doi:10.1101/603134
26.
MoreiraD.BarbosaF. (2019). Delay discounting in impulsive behavior: A systematic review. European Psychologist, 24, 312–321. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000360
27.
MurphyC.MackillopJ. (2012). Living in the here and now: Interrelationships between impulsivity, mindfulness, and alcohol misuse. Psychopharmacology, 219, 527–536. doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2573-0
28.
NivS.TuvbladC.RaineA.WangP.BakerL. A. (2012). Heritability and longitudinal stability of impulsivity in adolescence. Behavior Genetics, 42, 378–392. doi:10.1007/s10519-011-9518-6
29.
OkbayA.BaselmansB. M.De NeveJ. E.TurleyP.NivardM. G.FontanaM. A.. . . CesariniD. (2016). Genetic variants associated with subjective well-being, depressive symptoms, and neuroticism identified through genome-wide analyses. Nature Genetics, 48, 624–633. doi:10.1038/ng.3552
30.
PattonJ. H.StanfordM. S.BarrattE. S. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768–774.
31.
ReynoldsB.OrtengrenA.RichardsJ. B.de WitH. (2006). Dimensions of impulsive behavior: Personality and behavioral measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 305–315. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.03.024
32.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2). doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
33.
Sanchez-RoigeS.FontanillasP.ElsonS. L.GrayJ. C.de WitH.MacKillopJ.PalmerA. A. (2019). Genome-wide association studies of impulsive personality traits (BIS-11 and UPPSP) and drug experimentation in up to 22,861 adult research participants identify loci in the CACNA1I and CADM2 genes. The Journal of Neuroscience, 39, 2562–2572. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2662-18.2019
34.
Sanchez-RoigeS.FontanillasP.ElsonS. L., the 23andMe Research Team, PanditA.SchmidtE. M.. . . PalmerA. A. (2018). Genome-wide association study of delay discounting in 23,217 adult research participants of European ancestry. Nature Neuroscience, 21, 16–18. doi:10.1038/s41593-017-0032-x
35.
SharmaL.MarkonK. E.ClarkL. A. (2014). Toward a theory of distinct types of “impulsive” behaviors: A meta-analysis of self-report and behavioral measures. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 374–408. doi:10.1037/a0034418
36.
ShulmanE. P.HardenK. P.CheinJ. M.SteinbergL. (2016). The development of impulse control and sensation-seeking in adolescence: Independent or interdependent processes?Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26, 37–44. doi:10.1111/jora.12181
37.
SteinbergL.AlbertD.CauffmanE.BanichM.GrahamS.WoolardJ. (2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: Evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1764–1778. doi:10.1037/a0012955
38.
TellegenA. (1982). Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire manual. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
39.
van den BergS. M.de MoorM. H.VerweijK. J.KruegerR. F.LucianoM.Arias VasquezA.. . . BoomsmaD. I. (2016). Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for extraversion: Findings from the Genetics of Personality Consortium. Behavior Genetics, 46, 170–182. doi:10.1007/s10519-015-9735-5
40.
WhitesideS. P.LynamD. R. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00064-7
41.
WhitesideS. P.LynamD. R. (2003). Understanding the role of impulsivity and externalizing psychopathology in alcohol abuse: Application of the UPPS impulsive behavior scale. Experimental Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11, 210–217. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.11.3.210
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
