Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

People often fail to follow through on good intentions. While limited self-control is frequently the culprit, another cause is simply forgetting to enact intentions when opportunities arise. We introduce a novel, potent approach to facilitating follow-through: the reminders-through-association approach. This approach involves associating intentions (e.g., to mail a letter on your desk tomorrow) with distinctive cues that will capture attention when you have opportunities to act on those intentions (e.g., Valentine’s Day flowers that arrived late yesterday, which are sitting on your desk). We showed that cue-based reminders are more potent when the cues they employ are distinctive relative to (a) other regularly encountered stimuli and (b) other stimuli encountered concurrently. Further, they can be more effective than written or electronic reminder messages, and they are undervalued and underused. The reminders-through-association approach, developed by integrating and expanding on past research on self-control, reminders, and prospective memory, can be a powerful tool for policymakers and individuals.

Keywords

decision making memory policymaking self-control open data open materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J. R.

(1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261–295.

Ariely

Wertenbroch

(2002). Procrastination, deadlines, and performance: Self-control by precommitment. Psychological Science, 13, 219–224.

Ashraf

Karlan

Yin

(2006). Tying Odysseus to the mast: Evidence from a commitment savings product in the Philippines. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 635–672.

Austin

Sigurdsson

S. O.

Rubin

Y. S.

(2006). An examination of the effects of delayed versus immediate prompts on safety belt use. Environment & Behavior, 38, 140–149.

Bazerman

(2014). The power of noticing: What the best leaders see. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

Brandimonte

M. A.

Passolunghi

M. C.

(1994). The effect of cue-familiarity, cue-distinctiveness, and retention interval on prospective remembering. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 565–587.

Chapman

G. B.

Colby

Yoon

(2010). Opting in vs opting out of influenza vaccination. Journal of the American Medical Association, 304, 43–44.

Dismukes

R. K.

(2012). Prospective memory in workplace and everyday situations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 215–220.

Ericson

K. M. M.

(2011). Forgetting we forget: Overconfidence and memory. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9, 43–60.

10.

Gerber

A. S.

Rogers

(2009). Descriptive social norms and motivation to vote: Everybody’s voting and so should you. The Journal of Politics, 71, 178–191.

11.

Gollwitzer

P. M.

Sheeran

(2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 69–119). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

12.

James

(1890). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Holt.

13.

Jones

G. V.

(1979). Analyzing memory by cuing: Intrinsic and extrinsic knowledge. In Sutherland

N. S.

(Ed.), Tutorial essays in psychology: A guide to recent advances (Vol. 2, pp. 119–149). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

14.

Karlan

Ratan

A. L.

Zinman

(2014). Savings by and for the poor: A research review and agenda. Review of Income and Wealth, 60, 36–78.

15.

Madrian

B. C.

Shea

D. F.

(2001). The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1149–1187.

16.

McDaniel

M. A.

Einstein

G. O.

(1993). The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctiveness in prospective memory. Memory, 1, 23–41.

17.

Milkman

K. L.

Beshears

Choi

J. J.

Laibson

Madrian

B. C.

(2011). Using implementation intentions prompts to enhance influenza vaccination rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 10415–10420.

18.

Milkman

K. L.

Beshears

Choi

J. J.

Laibson

Madrian

B. C.

(2013). Planning prompts as a means of increasing preventive screening rates. Preventive Medicine, 56, 92–93.

19.

Milkman

K. L.

Chugh

Bazerman

M. H.

(2009). How can decision making be improved? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 379–383.

20.

Milkman

K. L.

Minson

J. A.

Volpp

K. G. M.

(2014). Holding The Hunger Games hostage at the gym: An evaluation of temptation bundling. Management Science, 60, 283–299.

21.

Nickerson

D. W.

(2007). Does email boost turnout? Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2, 369–379.

22.

Nickerson

D. W.

Rogers

(2010). Do you have a voting plan? Implementation intentions, voter turnout, and organic plan making. Psychological Science, 21, 194–199.

23.

O’Donoghue

Rabin

(1999). Doing it now or later. American Economic Review, 89, 103–124.

24.

O’Donoghue

Rabin

(2001). Choice and procrastination. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 121–160.

25.

Pronin

Lin

D. Y.

Ross

(2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 369–381.

26.

Read

Loewenstein

Kalyanaraman

(1999). Mixing virtue and vice: Combining the immediacy effect and the diversification heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 257–273.

27.

Read

Van Leeuwen

(1998). Predicting hunger: The effects of appetite and delay on choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 189–205.

28.

Rogers

Bazerman

M. H.

(2008). Future lock-in: Future implementation increases selection of ‘should’ choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106, 1–20.

29.

Rogers

Milkman

K. L.

John

Norton

M. I.

(in press). Making the best-laid plans better: How plan making increases follow-through. Behavioral Science & Policy.

30.

Rogers

Milkman

K. L.

Volpp

K. G.

(2014). Commitment devices: Using initiatives to change behavior. Journal of the American Medical Association, 311, 2065–2066.

31.

Schultz

P. W.

Nolan

J. M.

Cialdini

R. B.

Goldstein

N. J.

Griskevicius

(2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429–434.

32.

Schwartz

Mochon

Wyper

Maroba

Patel

Ariely

(2014). Healthier by precommitment. Psychological Science, 25, 538–546.

33.

Shea

DuMouchel

Bahamonde

(1996). A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 3, 399–409.

34.

Simons

D. J.

Chabris

C. F.

(1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059–1074.

35.

Soman

Cheema

(2011). Earmarking and partitioning: Increasing saving by low-income households. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(Suppl.), S14–S22.

36.

Thaler

R. H.

Sunstein

C. R.

(2003). Libertarian paternalism. American Economic Review, 93, 175–179.

37.

Tulving

(1974). Cue-dependent forgetting: When we forget something we once knew, it does not necessarily mean that the memory trace has been lost; it may only be inaccessible. American Scientist, 62, 74–82.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.07 MB

0.00 MB

Reminders Through Association

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material