The discovery of words in continuous speech is one of the first challenges faced by infants during language acquisition. This process is partially facilitated by statistical learning, the ability to discover and encode relevant patterns in the environment. Here, we used an electroencephalogram (EEG) index of neural entrainment to track 6-month-olds’ (N = 25) segmentation of words from continuous speech. Infants’ neural entrainment to embedded words increased logarithmically over the learning period, consistent with a perceptual shift from isolated syllables to wordlike units. Moreover, infants’ neural entrainment during learning predicted postlearning behavioral measures of word discrimination (n = 18). Finally, the logarithmic increase in entrainment to words was comparable in infants and adults, suggesting that infants and adults follow similar learning trajectories when tracking probability information among speech sounds. Statistical-learning effects in infants and adults may reflect overlapping neural mechanisms, which emerge early in life and are maintained throughout the life span.
AslinR. N.SaffranJ. R.NewportE. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 9, 321–324.
2.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
3.
BatterinkL. (2020). Syllables in sync form a link: Neural phase-locking reflects word knowledge during language learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32, 1735–1748.
4.
BatterinkL. J.PallerK. A. (2017). Online neural monitoring of statistical learning. Cortex, 90, 31–45.
5.
BatterinkL. J.PallerK. A. (2019). Statistical learning of speech regularities can occur outside the focus of attention. Cortex, 115, 56–71. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.013
6.
BergelsonE.SwingleyD. (2012). At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 3253–3258. doi:10.1073/pnas.1113380109
7.
BuiattiM.PeñaM.Dehaene-LambertzG. (2009). Investigating the neural correlates of continuous speech computation with frequency-tagged neuroelectric responses. NeuroImage, 44, 509–519.
8.
CirelliL. K.SpinelliC.NozaradanS.TrainorL. J. (2016). Measuring neural entrainment to beat and meter in infants: Effects of music background. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10, Article 229. doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00229
9.
DayanE.CohenL. G. (2011). Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning. Neuron, 72, 443–454.
10.
Dehaene-LambertzG.GligaT. (2004). Common neural basis for phoneme processing in infants and adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1375–1387.
11.
DelormeA.MakeigS. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9–21.
12.
DingN.MelloniL.ZhangH.TianX.PoeppelD. (2016). Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Nature Neuroscience, 19, 158–164.
13.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
14.
FlóA.BrusiniP.MacagnoF.NesporM.MehlerJ.FerryA. L. (2019). Newborns are sensitive to multiple cues for word segmentation in continuous speech. Developmental Science, 22(4), Article e12802. doi:10.1111/desc.12802
15.
FujiokaT.MouradN.HeC.TrainorL. J. (2011). Comparison of artifact correction methods for infant EEG applied to extraction of event-related potential signals. Clinical Neurophysiology, 122, 43–51.
16.
Graf EstesK.EvansJ. L.AlibaliM. W.SaffranJ. R. (2007). Can infants map meaning to newly segmented words? Statistical segmentation and word learning. Psychological Science, 18, 254–260.
17.
Graf EstesK.Lew-WilliamsC. (2015). Listening through voices: Infant statistical word segmentation across multiple speakers. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1517–1528. doi:10.1037/a0039725
18.
HunterM. A.AmesE. W.KoopmanR. (1983). Effects of stimulus complexity and familiarization time on infant preferences for novel and familiar stimuli. Developmental Psychology, 19, 338–352.
19.
JaroszA. F.WileyJ. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7(1), Article 2. doi:10.7771/1932-6246.1167
20.
KabdebonC.PenaM.BuiattiM.Dehaene-LambertzG. (2015). Electrophysiological evidence of statistical learning of long-distance dependencies in 8-month-old preterm and full-term infants. Brain and Language, 148, 25–36.
21.
KarniA.SagiD. (1993). The time course of learning a visual skill. Nature, 365, 250–252.
22.
KlattD. H. (1980). Speech perception: A model of acoustic-phonetic analysis and lexical access. In ColeR. A. (Ed.), Perception and production of fluent speech (pp. 243–288). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
LanyJ.ShoaibA.ThompsonA.EstesK. G. (2018). Infant statistical-learning ability is related to real-time language processing. Journal of Child Language, 45, 368–391.
24.
MouradN.ReillyJ. P.de BruinH.HaseyG.MacCrimmonD. (2007). A simple and fast algorithm for automatic suppression of high-amplitude artifacts in EEG data. In 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP ’07 (pp. 1393–1396). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2007.366699
25.
NozaradanS.PeretzI.MissalM.MourauxA. (2011). Tagging the neuronal entrainment to beat and meter. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 10234–10240.
26.
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
27.
RieckeL.FormisanoE.SorgerB.BaskentD.GaudrainE. (2018). Neural entrainment to speech modulates speech intelligibility. Current Biology, 28, 161–169.
28.
SaffranJ. R. (2001). Words in a sea of sounds: The output of infant statistical learning. Cognition, 81, 149–169.
29.
SaffranJ. R.AslinR. N.NewportE. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926–1928.
30.
SaffranJ. R.KirkhamN. Z. (2018). Infant statistical learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 181–203.
31.
SaffranJ. R.NewportE. L.AslinR. N.TunickR. A.BarruecoS. (1997). Incidental language learning: Listening (and learning) out of the corner of your ear. Psychological Science, 8, 101–105.
32.
SchroederC. E.LakatosP. (2009). Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection. Trends in Neurosciences, 32(1), 9–18.
33.
ShiR.WerkerJ. F. (2001). Six-month-old infants’ preference for lexical words. Psychological Science, 12, 70–75.
34.
SiegelmanN.BogaertsL.KronenfeldO.FrostR. (2018). Redefining “learning” in statistical learning: What does an online measure reveal about the assimilation of visual regularities?Cognitive Science, 42, 692–727.
35.
SwingleyD. (2005). 11-month-olds’ knowledge of how familiar words sound. Developmental Science, 8, 432–443.
36.
TeinonenT.FellmanV.NäätänenR.AlkuP.HuotilainenM. (2009). Statistical language learning in neonates revealed by event-related brain potentials. BMC Neuroscience, 10, Article 21. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-10-21
37.
ThiessenE. D.GirardS.EricksonL. C. (2016). Statistical learning and the critical period: How a continuous learning mechanism can give rise to discontinuous learning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 7, 276–288.
38.
ThutG.MiniussiC.GrossJ. (2012). The functional importance of rhythmic activity in the brain. Current Biology, 22, R658–R663.
39.
WagenmakersE.-J.LoveJ.MarsmanM.JamilT.LyA.VerhagenJ.. . . MoreyR. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25, 58–76.
40.
WilschA.NeulingT.ObleserJ.HerrmanC. S. (2018). Transcranial alternating current stimulation with speech envelopes modulates speech comprehension. NeuroImage, 172, 766–774.
41.
WinterB. (2013). Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. arXiv. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.5499
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
