We examined risky sexual choice under the lens of rational decision-making. Participants (N = 257) completed a novel sexual-choice task in which they selected from among hypothetical sexual partners varying in physical attractiveness and in the probability that one would contract a sexually transmitted infection (STI) from a one-time sexual encounter with them. We found that nearly all participants evaluated the sexual-choice alternatives in a coherent fashion consistent with utility-based theories of rational choice. In subsequent analyses, we classified participants’ responses according to whether their sexual preferences were based on maximizing attractiveness or minimizing the risk of STIs. Finally, we established an association between sexual choice in our task and reported real-world sexual risk-taking.
AgochaV.CooperM. (1999). Risk perceptions and safer-sex intentions: Does a partner’s physical attractiveness undermine the use of risk-relevant information?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 751–765. doi:10.1177/0146167299025006009
2.
AjzenI. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26, 1113–1127. doi:10.1080/08870446.2011.613995
3.
ArbuthnottD.FedinaT. Y.PletcherS. D.PromislowD. E. L. (2017). Mate choice in fruit flies is rational and adaptive. Nature Communications, 8, Article 13953. doi:10.1038/ncomms13953
4.
ArielyD.LoewensteinG. (2006). The heat of the moment: The effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 87–98.
5.
BlaisA. R.WeberE. U. (2001). Domain-specificity and gender differences in decision making. Risk Decision and Policy, 6, 47–69.
6.
BrownN.ParkS.SteinleyD.Davis-StoberC. P. (2018). Modeling between-subject variability in decision strategies via statistical clustering: A p-median approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31, 250–264. doi:10.1002/bdm.1957
7.
CavagnaroD. R.Davis-StoberC. P. (2014). Transitive in our preferences, but transitive in different ways: An analysis of choice variability. Decision, 1(2), 102–122.
8.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2018. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
9.
ColladoA.JohnsonP. S.LoyaJ. M.JohnsonM. W.YiR. (2017). Discounting of condom-protected sex as a measure of high risk for sexually transmitted infection among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 2187–2195. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0836-x
10.
DavisK. C.HendershotC. S.GeorgeW. H.NorrisJ.HeimanJ. R. (2007). Alcohol’s effects on sexual decision making: An integration of alcohol myopia and individual differences. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 68, 843–851.
11.
Davis-StoberC. P. (2012). A lexicographic semiorder polytope and probabilistic representations of choice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56, 86–94. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2012.01.003
12.
Davis-StoberC. P.BrownN.CavagnaroD. R. (2015). Individual differences in the algebraic structure of preferences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 66, 70–82. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2014.12.003
13.
Dechaume-MoncharmontF. X.FreychetM.MotreuilS.CézillyF. (2013). Female mate choice in convict cichlids is transitive and consistent with a self-referent directional preference. Frontiers in Zoology, 10, Article 69. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-10-69
14.
FalmagneJ. C. (1978). A representation theorem for finite random scale systems. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 18(1), 52–72.
15.
FrommeK.KatzE. C.RivetK. (1997). Outcome expectancies and risk-taking behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21, 421–442. doi:10.1023/A:1021932326716
16.
GerrardM.GibbonsF. X.HoulihanA. E.StockM. L.PomeryE. A. (2008). A dual-process approach to health risk decision making: The prototype willingness model. Developmental Review, 28(1), 29–61. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.10.001
HanochY.JohnsonJ. G.WilkeA. (2006). Domain specificity in experimental measures and participant recruitment: An application to risk-taking behavior. Psychological Science, 17, 300–304.
19.
HennessyM.FishbeinM.CurtisB.BarrettD. W. (2007). Evaluating the risk and attractiveness of romantic partners when confronted with contradictory cues. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 479–490. doi:10.1007/s10461-006-9156-9
20.
HolmesK. K.LevineR.WeaverM. (2004). Effectiveness of condoms in preventing sexually transmitted infections. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82, 454–461. doi:10.1590/S0042-96862004000600012
21.
JeffreysH. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
22.
KatzE. C.FrommeK.D’AmicoE. J. (2000). Effects of outcome expectancies and personality on young adults’ illicit drug use, heavy drinking, and risky sexual behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24, 1–22.
23.
KenrickD. T.GriskeviciusV.SundieJ. M.LiN. P.LiY. J.NeubergS. L. (2009). Deep rationality: The evolutionary economics of decision making. Social Cognition, 27, 764–785. doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.5.764
24.
KingK. M.NguyenH. V.KostermanR.BaileyJ. A.HawkinsJ. D. (2012). Co-occurrence of sexual risk behaviors and substance use across emerging adulthood: Evidence for state- and trait-level associations. Addiction, 107, 1288–1296. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03792.x
25.
KirbyD. (2002). Effective approaches to reducing adolescent unprotected sex, pregnancy, and childbearing. Journal of Sex Research, 39(1), 51–57. doi:10.1080/00224490209552120
26.
KirbyD. (2007). Emerging answers 2007: Research findings on programs to reduce teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. Washington, DC: Power to Decide.
27.
KlugkistI.HoijtinkH. (2007). The Bayes factor for inequality and about equality constrained models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 51, 6367–6379. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2007.01.024
28.
LeaA. M.RyanM. J. (2015). Irrationality in mate choice revealed by túngara frogs. Science, 349, 964–966. doi:10.1126/science.aab2012
LuceR. D. (1956). Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination. Econometrica, 24, 178–191. doi:10.2307/1905751
31.
MaD. S.CorrellJ.WittenbrinkB. (2015). The Chicago Face Database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 1122–1135. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5
32.
MasaroC. L.DahintenV. S.JohnsonJ.OgilvieG.PatrickD. M. (2008). Perceptions of sexual partner safety. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 35, 566–571. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181660c43
33.
MillsteinS. G.Halpern-FelsherB. L. (2002). Judgments about risk and perceived invulnerability in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12, 399–422. doi:10.1111/1532-7795.00039
34.
MoreyR. D.RouderJ. N. (2018). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs. Retrieved from https://rdrr.io/cran/BayesFactor/
35.
Owusu-EduseiK.ChessonH. W.GiftT. L.TaoG.MahajanR.OcfemiaM. C. B.KentC. K. (2013). The estimated direct medical cost of selected sexually transmitted infections in the United States, 2008. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 40, 197–201. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318285c6d2
36.
RegenwetterM.DanaJ.Davis-StoberC. P. (2011). Transitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 118, 42–56. doi:10.1037/a0021150
37.
RegenwetterM.Davis-StoberC. P. (2012). Behavioral variability of choice versus structural inconsistency of preferences. Psychological Review, 119, 408–416. doi:10.1037/a0027372
38.
SantelliJ. S.BrenerN. D.LowryR.BhattA.ZabinL. S. (1998). Multiple sexual partners among U.S. adolescents and young adults. Family Planning Perspectives, 30, 271–275. doi:10.2307/2991502
39.
SuckR. (1992). Geometric and combinatorial properties of the polytope of binary choice probabilities. Mathematical Social Sciences, 23, 81–102.
40.
TverskyA. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31–48. doi:10.1037/h0026750
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
