The term fake news is increasingly used to discredit information from reputable news organizations. We tested the possibility that fake-news claims are appealing because they satisfy the need to see the world as structured. Believing that news organizations are involved in an orchestrated disinformation campaign implies a more orderly world than believing that the news is prone to random errors. Across six studies (N > 2,800), individuals with dispositionally high or situationally increased need for structure were more likely to attribute contested news stories to intentional deception than to journalistic incompetence. The effect persisted for stories that were ideologically consistent and ideologically inconsistent and after analyses controlled for strength of political identification. Political orientation showed a moderating effect; specifically, the link between need for structure and belief in intentional deception was stronger for Republican participants than for Democratic participants. This work helps to identify when, why, and for whom fake-news claims are persuasive.
AllcottH.GentzkowM. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31, 211–236.
2.
AnthonyA.MouldingR. (2019). Breaking the news: Belief in fake news and conspiracist beliefs. Australian Journal of Psychology, 71, 154–162.
3.
BradleyR. H.WebbR. (1976). Age-related differences in locus of control orientation in three behavior domains. Human Development, 19, 49–55.
4.
BronsteinM. V.PennycookG.BearA.RandD. G.CannonT. D. (2019). Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8, 108–117. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.005
5.
CrockerJ.ThompsonL. L.McGrawK. M.IngermanC. (1987). Downward comparison, prejudice, and evaluations of others: Effects of self-esteem and threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 907–916.
FioriK. L.BrownE. E.CortinaK. S.AntonucciT. C. (2006). Locus of control as a mediator of the relationship between religiosity and life satisfaction: Age, race, and gender differences. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 9, 239–263.
8.
GallifordN.FurnhamA. (2017). Individual difference factors and beliefs in medical and political conspiracy theories. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58, 422–428.
9.
GarrettR. K.WeeksB. E. (2017). Epistemic beliefs’ role in promoting misperceptions and conspiracist ideation. PLOS ONE, 12(9), Article e0184733. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184733
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
14.
JostJ. T.SterlingJ.SternC. (2018). Getting closure on conservatism, or the politics of epistemic and existential motivation. In KopetzC.FishbachA. (Eds.), The motivation-cognition interface, from the lab to the real world: A Festschrift in honor of Arie W. Kruglanski (Vol. I, pp. 56–87). New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
JurkowitzM.MitchellA.ShearerE.WalkerM. (2020). U.S. media polarization and the 2020 election: A nation divided. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
16.
KayA. C.GaucherD.McGregorI.NashK. (2010). Religious belief as compensatory control. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 37–48.
17.
KayA. C.GaucherD.NapierJ. L.CallanM. J.LaurinK. (2008). God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 18–35.
18.
KayA. C.SullivanD. (2013). Cultural unity and diversity in compensatory control processes. In GelfandM. J.ChiuC.HongY. (Eds.), Advances in Culture and Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 181–226). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
KruglanskiA. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York, NY: Plenum.
20.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
21.
LandauM. J.KayA. C.WhitsonJ. A. (2015). Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 694–722.
22.
LandauR. (1995). Locus of control and socioeconomic status: Does internal locus of control reflect real resources and opportunities or personal coping abilities?Social Science & Medicine, 41, 1499–1505.
23.
LernerM. (1980). The belief in a just world. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
NoelJ. G.WannD. L.BranscombeN. R. (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 127–137.
26.
PennycookG.BearA.CollinsE. T.RandD. G. (2020). The implied truth effect: Attaching warnings to a subset of fake news headlines increases perceived accuracy of headlines without warnings. Management Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3478
27.
PennycookG.CannonT. D.RandD. G. (2018). Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 1865–1880.
28.
PennycookG.RandD. G. (2020). Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of Personality, 88, 185–200. doi:10.1111/jopy.12476
SternC.WestT. V.RuleN. O. (2015). Conservatives negatively evaluate counterstereotypical people to maintain a sense of certainty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112, 15337–15342.
33.
SullivanD.LandauM. J.RothschildZ. K. (2010). An existential function of enemyship: Evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 434–449.
34.
ThompsonM. M.NaccaratoM. E.ParkerK. C. H.MoskowitzG. B. (2001). The personal need for structure and personal fear of invalidity measures: Historical perspectives, current applications, and future directions. In MoskowitzG. B. (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition (pp. 19–39). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35.
van ProoijenJ.-W.KrouwelA. P. M.PolletT. V. (2015). Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 570–578.
36.
ViechtbauerW. (2007). Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 37–52.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
