Standard approaches for identifying task-completion strategies, such as precrastination and procrastination, reduce behavior to single markers that oversimplify the process of task completion. To illustrate this point, we consider three task-completion strategies and introduce a new method to identify their use. This approach was tested using an archival data set (N = 8,655) of the available electronic records of research participation at Kansas State University. The approach outperformed standard diagnostic approaches and yielded an interesting finding: Several strategies were associated with negative outcomes. Specifically, both procrastinators and precrastinators struggled to finish tasks on time. Together, these findings underscore the importance of using holistic approaches to determine the relationship among task characteristics, individual differences, and task completion.
AinslieG. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 463–496.
2.
AkaikeH. (1973). Maximum likelihood identification of Gaussian autoregressive moving average models. Biometrika, 60, 255–265.
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. The American Psychologist, 63, 602–614. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602
4.
BlasbergS. A.RogersK. H.PaulhusD. L. (2014). The Bidimensional Impression Management Index (BIMI): Measuring agentic and communal forms of impression management. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 523–531. doi:10.1080/00223891.2013.862252
5.
FerrariJ. R.TiceD. M. (2000). Procrastination as a self-handicap for men and women: A task-avoidance strategy in a laboratory setting. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 73–83. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1999.2261
6.
FournierL. R.StubblefieldA. M.DyreB. P.RosenbaumD. A. (2019). Starting or finishing sooner? Sequencing preferences in object transfer tasks. Psychological Research, 83, 1674–1684. doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1022-7
7.
FraleyC.RafteryA. E.ScruccaL.MurphyT. B.FopM. (2019). mclust: Gaussian mixture modelling for model-based clustering, classification, and density estimation. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mclust/index.html
8.
GeversJ.MohammedS.BaytalskayaN. (2015). The conceptualisation and measurement of pacing styles. Applied Psychology, 64, 499–540. doi:10.1111/apps.12016
9.
GröpelP.SteelP. (2008). A mega-trial investigation of goal setting, interest enhancement, and energy on procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 406–411. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.015
10.
GrundA.FriesS. (2018). Understanding procrastination: A motivational approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 121, 120–130. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.035
11.
HensleyL. C. (2014). Reconsidering active procrastination: Relations to motivation and achievement in college anatomy. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 157–164. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.10.012
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.). Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
14.
KleinG.KlingerD. (1991). Naturalistic decision making. Human Systems IAC Gateway, 11, 16–19.
15.
KlingsieckK. B. (2013). Procrastination: When good things don’t come to those who wait. European Psychologist, 18, 24–34.
16.
KrauseK.FreundA. M. (2014). Delay or procrastination—A comparison of self-report and behavioral measures of procrastination and their impact on affective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 75–80. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.050
17.
KurzbanR.DuckworthA.KableJ. W.MyersJ. (2013). An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 661–679. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12003196
18.
MeadeA. W.CraigS. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17, 437–455. doi:10.1037/a0028085
19.
MitchellS. H. (2017). Devaluation of outcomes due to their cost: Extending discounting models beyond delay. In StevensJ. R. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol 64. Impulsivity (pp. 145–161). Champaign, IL: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51721-6_5
20.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
21.
OberskiD. (2016). Mixture models: Latent profile and latent class analysis. In RobertsonJ.KapteinM. (Eds.), Modern statistical methods for HCI (pp. 275–287). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26633-6_12
22.
PattonJ. H.StanfordM. S.BarrattE. S. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768–774.
23.
RosenbaumD. A.GongL.PottsC. A. (2014). Pre-crastination: Hastening subgoal completion at the expense of extra physical effort. Psychological Science, 25, 1487–1496. doi:10.1177/0956797614532657
24.
SilverM.SabiniJ. (1981). Procrastinating. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 11, 207–221.
25.
SimonH. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.
26.
StanfordM. S.MathiasC. W.DoughertyD. M.LakeS. L.AndersonN. E.PattonJ. H. (2009). Fifty years of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale: An update and review. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 385–395. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.008
27.
SteelP. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 65–94. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65
28.
SteelP. (2010). Arousal, avoidant and decisional procrastinators: Do they exist?Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 926–934. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.025
29.
SteelP.KlingsieckK. B. (2016). Academic procrastination: Psychological antecedents revisited. Australian Psychologist, 51, 36–46. doi:10.1111/ap.12173
30.
SteelP.SvartdalF.ThundiyilT.BrothenT. (2018). Examining procrastination across multiple goal stages: A longitudinal study of temporal motivation theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 327. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00327
31.
SvartdalF.SteelP. (2017). Irrational delay revisited: Examining five procrastination scales in a global sample. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1927. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01927
32.
TeinJ.CoxeS.ChamH. (2013). Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 20, 640–657.
33.
TuckmanB. W. (1991). The development and concurrent validity of the procrastination scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 473–480.
34.
van EerdeW. (2015). Time management and procrastination. In MumfordM. D.FreseM. (Eds.), The psychology of planning in organizations: Research and applications (pp. 312–333). New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
36.
WickensC. D.GutzwillerR. S.SantamariaA. (2015). Discrete task switching in overload: A meta-analyses and a model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 79, 79–84. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.01.002
37.
XieY.YangJ.ChenF. (2018). Procrastination and multidimensional perfectionism: A meta-analysis of main, mediating, and moderating effects. Social Behavior and Personality, 46, 395–408. doi:10.2224/sbp.6680
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
