Healthy food labels tout health benefits, yet most people prioritize tastiness in the moment of food choice. In a preregistered intervention, we tested whether taste-focused labels compared with health-focused labels increased vegetable intake at five university dining halls throughout the United States. Across 137,842 diner decisions, 185 days, and 24 vegetable types, taste-focused labels increased vegetable selection by 29% compared with health-focused labels and by 14% compared with basic labels. Vegetable consumption also increased. Supplementary studies further probed the mediators, moderators, and boundaries of these effects. Increased expectations of a positive taste experience mediated the effect of taste-focused labels on vegetable selection. Moderation tests revealed greater effects in settings that served tastier vegetable recipes. Taste-focused labels outperformed labels that merely contained positive words, fancy words, or lists of ingredients. Together, these studies show that emphasizing tasty and enjoyable attributes increases vegetable intake in real-world settings in which vegetables compete with less healthy options.
AfshinA.SurP. J.FayK. A.CornabyL.FerraraG.SalamaJ. S.. . . MurrayC. J. L. (2019). Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet, 393, 1958–1972. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8
2.
AggarwalA.RehmC. D.MonsivaisP.DrewnowskiA. (2016). Importance of taste, nutrition, cost and convenience in relation to diet quality: Evidence of nutrition resilience among US adults using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007–2010. Preventive Medicine, 90, 184–192.
3.
BlockJ. P.RobertoC. A. (2014). Potential benefits of calorie labeling in restaurants. Journal of the American Medical Association, 312, 887–888.
4.
BoswellR. G.SunW.SuzukiS.KoberH. (2018). Training in cognitive strategies reduces eating and improves food choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115, E11238–E11247.
5.
CohenJ. F. W.RichardsonS. A.CluggishS. A.ParkerE.CatalanoP. J.RimmE. B. (2015). Effects of choice architecture and chef-enhanced meals on the selection and consumption of healthier school foods: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatrics, 169, 431–437.
6.
CrumA. J.CorbinW. R.BrownellK. D.SaloveyP. (2011). Mind over milkshakes: Mindsets, not just nutrients, determine ghrelin response. Health Psychology, 30, 424–429.
7.
DonnellyG. E.ZatzL. Y.SvirskyD.JohnL. K. (2018). The effect of graphic warnings on sugary-drink purchasing. Psychological Science, 29, 1321–1333. doi:10.1177/0956797618766361
8.
FinkelsteinS. R.FishbachA. (2010). When healthy food makes you hungry. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 357–367.
9.
GlanzK.BasilM.MaibachE.GoldbergJ.SnyderD. (1998). Why Americans eat what they do: Taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98, 1118–1126.
10.
HawkesC.SmithT. G.JewellJ.WardleJ.HammondR. A.FrielS.. . . KainJ. K. (2015). Smart food policies for obesity prevention. The Lancet, 385, 2410–2421.
11.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
IrmakC.VallenB.RobinsonS. R. (2011). The impact of product name on dieters’ and nondieters’ food evaluations and consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 390–405.
13.
JuddC. M.WestfallJ.KennyD. A. (2017). Experiments with more than one random factor: Designs, analytic models, and statistical power. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 601–625.
14.
KellyB.HalfordJ. C.BoylandE. J.ChapmanK.Bautista-CastañoI.BergC.. . . EffertzT. (2010). Television food advertising to children: A global perspective. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1730–1736.
15.
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13). doi:10.18637/jss.v082.i13
16.
LähteenmäkiL.LampilaP.GrunertK.BoztugY.Ueland ÅströmØ. A.MartinsdóttirE. (2010). Impact of health-related claims on the perception of other product attributes. Food Policy, 35, 230–239.
17.
MaimaranM.FishbachA. (2014). If it’s useful and you know it, do you eat? Preschoolers refrain from instrumental food. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 642–655.
18.
PapiesE. K.VelingH. (2013). Healthy dining. Subtle diet reminders at the point of purchase increase low-calorie food choices among both chronic and current dieters. Appetite, 61, 1–7.
19.
ProvencherV.PolivyJ.HermanC. P. (2009). Perceived healthiness of food. If it’s healthy, you can eat more!Appetite, 52, 340–344.
20.
RaghunathanR.NaylorR. W.HoyerW. D. (2006). The unhealthy = tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products. Journal of Marketing, 70, 170–184.
21.
RobertoC. A.SwinburnB.HawkesC.HuangT. T.CostaS. A.AsheM.. . . BrownellK. D. (2015). Patchy progress on obesity prevention: Emerging examples, entrenched barriers, and new thinking. The Lancet, 385, 2400–2409.
22.
RobinsonT. N.BorzekowskiD. L. G.MathesonD. M.KraemerH. C. (2007). Effects of fast food branding on young children’s taste preferences. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 161, 792–797.
23.
RStudio Team (2015). RStudio: Integrated Development for R [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.rstudio.com/
24.
SpencerM.KurzerA.CienfuegosC.GuinardJ.-X. (2018). Student consumer acceptance of plant-forward burrito bowls in which two-thirds of the meat has been replaced with legumes and vegetables: The Flexitarian Flip™ in university dining venues. Appetite, 131, 14–27.
25.
SuherJ.RaghunathanR.HoyerW. D. (2016). Eating healthy or feeling empty? How the “healthy = less filling” intuition influences satiety. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 1, 26–40.
26.
ThorndikeA. N.GelsominE. D.McCurleyJ. L.LevyD. E. (2019). Calories purchased by hospital employees after implementation of a cafeteria traffic light-labeling and choice architecture program. JAMA Network Open, 2(7), Article e196789. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.6789
27.
TurnwaldB. P.BolesD. Z.CrumA. J. (2017). Association between indulgent descriptions and vegetable consumption: Twisted carrots and dynamite beets. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177, 1216–1218.
28.
TurnwaldB. P.CrumA. J. (2019). Smart food policy for healthy food labeling: Leading with taste, not healthiness, to shift consumption and enjoyment of healthy foods. Preventive Medicine, 119, 7–13.
29.
TurnwaldB. P.CrumA. J. (in press). The taste-focused labeling intervention. In WaltonG. M.CrumA. J. (Eds.), Handbook of wise interventions: How social-psychological insights can help solve problems. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
30.
TurnwaldB. P.JurafskyD.ConnerA.CrumA. J. (2017). Reading between the menu lines: Are restaurants’ descriptions of “healthy” foods unappealing?Health Psychology, 36, 1034–1037.
31.
Van DesselP.HughesS.De HouwerJ. (2018). Consequence-based approach-avoidance training: A new and improved method for changing behavior. Psychological Science, 29, 1899–1910.
32.
VeldhuizenM. G.NachtigalD. J.FlammerL. J.de AraujoI. E.SmallD. M. (2013). Verbal descriptors influence hypothalamic response to low-calorie drinks. Molecular Metabolism, 2, 270–280.
33.
WaltonG. M.WilsonT. D. (2018). Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems. Psychological Review, 125, 617–655.
34.
WansinkB.ChandonP. (2006). Can “low-fat” nutrition labels lead to obesity?Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 605–617.
35.
WardleJ.HuonG. (2000). An experimental investigation of the influence of health information on children’s taste preferences. Health Education Research, 15, 39–44.
36.
WoolleyK.FishbachA. (2016). For the fun of it: Harnessing immediate rewards to increase persistence in long-term goals. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 952–966.
37.
YeagerD. S.HanselmanP.WaltonG. M.MurrayJ. S.CrosnoeR.MullerC.. . .DweckC. S. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573, 364–369. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
