Most people will get married, and maintaining a quality marriage is critical to well-being. Nevertheless, many intimates experience declines in marital satisfaction, and a substantial proportion of marriages dissolve. Drawing from functional perspectives of human mating, we argue that one source of marital discord and dissolution is that people vary in their motivations to pursue uncommitted sex—that is, sociosexuality. We examined this possibility using data from two independent longitudinal studies of 204 newlywed couples and used actor–partner interdependence growth-curve modeling. Results demonstrated that relatively unrestricted (vs. restricted) sociosexuality was associated with an increased probability of relationship dissolution through declines in marital satisfaction over time. Additional exploratory analyses provided preliminary evidence suggesting that frequent sex, high sexual satisfaction, and low stress weaken this association. These primary findings suggest that strong motives to pursue uncommitted sex may interfere with marital success, and the latter findings suggest potential buffers for these negative outcomes.
AlvergneA.LummaaV. (2010). Does the contraceptive pill alter mate choice in humans?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 171–179.
2.
AmatoP. R.JamesS. (2010). Divorce in Europe and the United States: Commonalities and differences across nations. Family Science, 1, 2–13.
3.
BelskyJ.SteinbergL.DraperP. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647–670.
4.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L.ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5.
FinchamF. D.MayR. W. (2017). Infidelity in romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 70–74.
6.
FinkelE. J.HuiC. M.CarswellK. L.LarsonG. M. (2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 1–41.
7.
GangestadS. W.SimpsonJ. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 23, 573–587.
8.
GoldbergL. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7, 7–28.
9.
HammenC. L.AdrienC.GordonD.BurgeD.JaenickeC.HirotoD. (1987). Children of depressed mothers: Maternal strain and symptom predictors of dysfunction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 190–198.
10.
HeblM. R.KashyD. A. (1995). Sociosexuality and everyday social interaction. Personal Relationships, 2, 371–383.
11.
Holt-LunstadJ.SmithT. B.LaytonJ. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLOS Medicine, 7(7), e1000316. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
12.
HudsonW. W. (1998). Index of sexual satisfaction. In DavisC. M.YarberW. L.BausermanR.SchreerG.DavisS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 512–513). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
JacksonJ. J.KirkpatrickL. A. (2007). The structure and measurement of human mating strategies: Toward a multidimensional model of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 382–391.
14.
JonesM. (1998). Sociosexuality and motivations for romantic involvement. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 173–182.
15.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34.
16.
KelleyH. H.ThibautJ. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
17.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
18.
LiuH.UmbersonD. J. (2008). The times they are a changin’: Marital status and health differentials from 1972 to 2003. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 49, 239–253.
19.
McDonaldM. M.DonnellanM. B.NavarreteC. D. (2012). A life history approach to understanding the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 601–605.
20.
McNultyJ. K. (2016). Highlighting the contextual nature of interpersonal relationships. In OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 54, pp. 247–315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21.
McNultyJ. K.FinchamF. D. (2012). Beyond positive psychology? Toward a contextual view of psychological processes and well-being. American Psychologist, 67, 101–110.
22.
McNultyJ. K.MeltzerA. L.MakhanovaA.ManerJ. K. (2018). Attentional and evaluative biases help people maintain relationships by avoiding infidelity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 76–95.
23.
MeltzerA. L.MakhanovaA.HicksL. L.FrenchJ. E.McNultyJ. K.BradburyT. N. (2017). Quantifying the sexual afterglow: The lingering benefits of sex and their implications for pair-bonded relationships. Psychological Science, 28, 587–598.
24.
MeltzerA. L.McNultyJ. K.JacksonG. L.KarneyB. R. (2014). Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 418–428.
25.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2007). Stress crossover in newlywed marriage: A longitudinal and dyadic perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 594–607.
26.
NortonR. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and Family, 45, 141–151.
27.
OlderbakS. G.FigueredoA. J. (2010). Life history strategy as a longitudinal predictor of relationship satisfaction and dissolution. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 234–239.
28.
OsgoodC. E.SuciG.TannenbaumP. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
29.
PenkeL.AsendorpfJ. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135.
30.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.
31.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. SCheongY. F.CongdonR. (2011). HLM 7 for Windows [Computer software]. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International.
32.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
33.
RoblesT. F.SlatcherR. B.TrombelloJ. M.McGinnM. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 140–187.
34.
RodriguesD.LopesD.SmithC. V. (2017). Caught in a “bad romance”? Reconsidering the negative association between sociosexuality and relationship functioning. The Journal of Sex Research, 54, 1118–1127.
35.
RussellV. M.BakerL. R.McNultyJ. K. (2013). Attachment insecurity and infidelity in marriage: Do studies of dating relationships really inform us about marriage?Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 242–251.
36.
SchmittD. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 28, 247–275.
37.
SchummW. R.Paff-BergenL. A.HatchR. C.ObiorahF. C.CopelandJ. M.MeensL. D.BugaighisM. A. (1986). Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and Family, 48, 381–387.
38.
ScottS. B.PostK. M.StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J.RhoadesG. K. (2017). Changes in the sexual relationship and relationship adjustment precede extradyadic sexual involvement. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 395–406.
39.
ShackelfordT. K.GoetzA. T.BussD. M. (2005). Mate retention in marriage: Further evidence of the reliability of the Mate Retention Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 415–425.
40.
SimpsonJ. A. (1987). The dissolution of romantic relationships: Factors involved in relationship stability and emotional distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 683–692.
41.
SimpsonJ. A.GangestadS. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.
42.
SnijdersT. A.BoskerR. J. (2011). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.
43.
TofighiD.MacKinnonD. P. (2011). RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 692–700.
44.
TriversR. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In CampbellB. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine-Antherton.
45.
WebsterG. D.LaurenceauJ. P.SmithC. V.MahaffeyA. L.BryanA. D.BrunellA. B. (2015). An investment model of sociosexuality, relationship satisfaction, and commitment: Evidence from dating, engaged, and newlywed couples. Journal of Research in Personality, 55, 112–126.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
