Perception and action interact in nearly every moment of daily life. Previous studies have demonstrated not only that perceptual input shapes action but also that various factors associated with action—including individual abilities and biomechanical costs—influence perceptual decisions. However, it is unknown how action fluency affects the sensitivity of early-stage visual perception, such as orientation. To address this question, we used a dual-task paradigm: Participants prepared an action (e.g., grasping), while concurrently performing an orientation-change-detection task. We demonstrated that as actions became more fluent (e.g., as grasping errors decreased), perceptual-discrimination performance also improved. Importantly, we found that grasping training prior to discrimination enhanced subsequent perceptual sensitivity, supporting the notion of a reciprocal relation between perception and action.
AlvarezG. A.CavanaghP. (2008). Visual short-term memory operates more efficiently on boundary features than on surface features. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 346–364. doi:10.3758/PP.70.2.346
2.
AtkinsJ. E.FiserJ.JacobsR. A. (2001). Experience-dependent visual cue integration based on consistencies between visual and haptic percepts. Vision Research, 41, 449–461. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00254-6
3.
BekkeringH.NeggersS. F. W. (2002). Visual search is modulated by action intentions. Psychological Science, 13, 370–374. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2002.00466.x
4.
BrainardD. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
5.
BurkD.IngramJ. N.FranklinD. W.ShadlenM. N.WolpertD. M. (2014). Motor effort alters changes of mind in sensorimotor decision making. PLOS ONE, 9(3), Article e92681. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092681
6.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
ColbyC. L. (1991). The neuroanatomy and neurophysiology of attention. Journal of Child Neurology, 6(Suppl. 1), S90–S118. doi:10.1177/0883073891006001S11
8.
CoverT. M.ThomasJ. A. (1991). Elements of information theory. New York, NY: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/0471200611
9.
CraigheroL.FadigaL.RizzolattiG.UmiltàC. (1999). Action for perception: A motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1673–1692. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1673
10.
DeubelH.SchneiderW. X.PaprottaI. (1998). Selective dorsal and ventral processing: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism in reaching and perception. Visual Cognition, 5, 81–107. doi:10.1080/713756776
11.
DunnettC. W. (1955). A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 50, 1096–1121. doi:10.2307/2281208
12.
FranzV. H.GegenfurtnerK. R. (2008). Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 920–950. doi:10.1080/02643290701862449
13.
GonzalezC. L. R.GanelT.WhitwellR. L.MorrisseyB.GoodaleM. A. (2008). Practice makes perfect, but only with the right hand: Sensitivity to perceptual illusions with awkward grasps decreases with practice in the right but not the left hand. Neuropsychologia, 46, 624–631. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.006
14.
GuttelingT. P.KenemansJ. L.NeggersS. F. W. (2011). Grasping preparation enhances orientation change detection. PLOS ONE, 6(3), Article e17675. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017675
15.
GuttelingT. P.ParkS. Y.KenemansJ. L.NeggersS. F. W. (2013). TMS of the anterior intraparietal area selectively modulates orientation change detection during action preparation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 110, 33–41. doi:10.1152/jn.00622.2012
16.
GuttelingT. P.PetridouN.DumoulinS. O.HarveyB. M.AarnoutseE. J.KenemansJ. L.NeggersS. F. W. (2015). Action preparation shapes processing in early visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 6472–6480. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1358-14.2015
17.
HaffendenA. M.GoodaleM. A. (1998). The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 122–136. doi:10.1162/089892998563824
18.
HaguraN.HaggardP.DiedrichsenJ. (2017). Perceptual decisions are biased by the cost to act. eLife, 6, Article e18422. doi:10.7554/eLife.18422
19.
HubelD. H.WieselT. N. (1974). Sequence regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 158, 267–293. doi:10.1002/cne.901580304
20.
KhanA. Z.SongJ.-H.McPeekR. M. (2011). The eye dominates in guiding attention during simultaneous eye and hand movements. Journal of Vision, 11(1), Article 9. doi:10.1167/11.1.9
21.
LeviD. M.PolatU. (1996). Neural plasticity in adults with amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 37, 6830–6834. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.13.6830
22.
LuautéJ.HalliganP.RodeG.RossettiY.BoissonD. (2006). Visuo-spatial neglect: A systematic review of current interventions and their effectiveness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 961–982. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.03.001
23.
MacmillanN. A.CreelmanC. D. (2004). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
MaxwellS. E.DelaneyH. D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
MiallR. C.StanleyJ.TodhunterS.LevickC.LindoS.MiallJ. D. (2006). Performing hand actions assists the visual discrimination of similar hand postures. Neuropsychologia, 44, 966–976. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.006
26.
MoherJ.SongJ.-H. (2014). Perceptual decision processes flexibly adapt to avoid change-of-mind motor costs. Journal of Vision, 14(8), Article 1. doi:10.1167/14.8.1
27.
MotulskyH. J.BrownR. E. (2006). Detecting outliers when fitting data with nonlinear regression: A new method based on robust nonlinear regression and the false discovery rate. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, Article 123. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-123
28.
NeggersS. F. W.HuijbersW.VrijlandtC. M.VlaskampB. N. S.SchutterD. L. J. G.KenemansJ. L. (2007). TMS pulses on the frontal eye fields break coupling between visuospatial attention and eye movements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98, 2765–2778. doi:10.1152/jn.00357.2007
29.
PerryC. J.SergioL. E.CrawfordJ. D.FallahM. (2015). Hand placement near the visual stimulus improves orientation selectivity in V2 neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 113, 2859–2870. doi:10.1152/jn.00919.2013
30.
ReedC. L.BetzR.GarzaJ. P.RobertsR. J. (2010). Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 236–245. doi:10.3758/APP.72.1.236
31.
RosenbaumD. A.MarchakF.BarnesH. J.VaughanJ.SlottaJ. D.JorgensenM. J. (1990). Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. In JeannerodM. (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control (pp. 321–342). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
32.
RouderJ. N.SpeckmanP. L.SunD.MoreyR. D.IversonG. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225–237. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
33.
ŠidákZ. (1967). Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 626–633. doi:10.1080/01621459.1967.10482935
34.
StewartC. E.FielderA. R.StephensD. A.MoseleyM. J. (2002). Design of the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS). British Journal of Ophthalmology, 86, 915–919. doi:10.1136/bjo.86.8.915
35.
SuttleC. M.MelmothD. R.FinlayA. L.SloperJ. J.GrantS. (2011). Eye-hand coordination skills in children with and without amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 52, 1851–1864. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6341
36.
TaubE.MarkV. W.UswatteG. (2014). Implications of CI therapy for visual deficit training. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 8, Article 78. doi:10.3389/fnint.2014.00078
37.
ThomasL. E. (2017). Action experience drives visual-processing biases near the hands. Psychological Science, 28, 124–131. doi:10.1177/0956797616678189
38.
WittJ. K. (2011). Action’s effect on perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 201–206. doi:10.1177/0963721411408770
39.
WittJ. K.ProffittD. R. (2005). See the ball, hit the ball: Apparent ball size is correlated with batting average. Psychological Science, 16, 937–938. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01640.x
40.
WittJ. K.ProffittD. R.EpsteinW. (2004). Perceiving distance: A role of effort and intent. Perception, 33, 577–590. doi:10.1068/p5090
41.
WolfS. L.WinsteinC. J.MillerJ. P.TaubE.UswatteG.MorrisD.. . . Nichols-LarsenD. (2006). Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 2095–2104. doi:10.1001/jama.296.17.2095
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
