Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We replicated the study by Tucker-Drob, Cheung, and Briley (2014), who found that the association between science interest and science knowledge depended on economic resources at the family, school, and national levels, using data from the 2006 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). In more economically prosperous families, schools, and nations, student interest was more strongly correlated with actual knowledge. Here, we investigated whether these results still held despite substantial changes to educational and economic systems over roughly a decade. Using similar data from PISA 2015 (N = 537,170), we found largely consistent results. Students from more economically advantaged homes, schools, and nations exhibited a stronger link between interests and knowledge. However, these moderation effects were substantially reduced, and the main effect of science interest increased by nearly 25%, driven almost entirely by families of low socioeconomic status and nations with low gross domestic product. The interdependence of interests and resources is robust but perhaps weakening with educational progress.

Keywords

science interest science achievement economic resource cross-national expectancy value replication open data open materials preregistered

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asendorpf

J. B.

Conner

De Fruyt

De Houwer

Denissen

J. J.

Fiedler

Perugini

(2013). Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality, 27, 108–119.

Blackburn

Cipriani

G. P.

(2002). A model of longevity, fertility and growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 26, 187–204.

Democracy Index 2015: Democracy in an age of anxiety. (2016). The Economist. Retrieved from https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=DemocracyIndex2015

Donnellan

M. B.

Lucas

R. E.

(2018). Introduction to the special issue—A replication project in personality psychology. Journal of Research in Personality, 72, 1–4.

Gurria

(2016). PISA 2015 results in focus. PISA in Focus (No. 67). Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/aa9237e6-en.pdf?expires=1552319447&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=745810FED54A4B2912A7BA07A43E9BBB

Gylfason

(2001). Natural resources, education, and economic development. European Economic Review, 45, 847–859.

Hidi

Harackiewicz

J. M.

(2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151–179.

Hulleman

C. S.

Harackiewicz

J. M.

(2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326, 1410–1412.

Jackson

L. A.

von Eye

Biocca

F. A.

Barbatsis

Zhao

Fitzgerald

H. E.

(2006). Does home Internet use influence the academic performance of low-income children? Developmental Psychology, 42, 429–435.

10.

Knudsen

E. I.

Heckman

J. J.

Cameron

J. L.

Shonkoff

J. P.

(2006). Economic, neurobiological, and behavioral perspectives on building America’s future workforce. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 10155–10162.

11.

Marks

G. N.

(2015). Are school-SES effects statistical artefacts? Evidence from longitudinal population data. Oxford Review of Education, 41, 122–144.

12.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.

13.

National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2010). Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching Category 5. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/12999.

14.

Noonan

(2017). STEM jobs: 2017 update. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration.

15.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 technical report. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/2015-technical-report

16.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving (Rev. ed; pp. 17–46). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

17.

Schraad-Tischler

Schiller

(2016). Social justice in the EU—Index report 2016: Social inclusion monitor Europe. Gütersloh, Germany: Bertelsmann Stiftung.

18.

Simons

D. J.

(2014). The value of direct replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 76–80.

19.

Simons

D. J.

Shoda

Lindsay

D. S.

(2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1123–1128.

20.

Sirin

S. R.

(2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453.

21.

Thompson

(2011, July 15). How Khan Academy is changing the rules of education. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2011/07/ff_khan/

22.

Tucker-Drob

E. M.

Briley

D. A.

(2012). Socioeconomic status modifies interest-knowledge associations among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 9–15.

23.

Tucker-Drob

E. M.

Cheung

A. K.

Briley

D. A.

(2014). Gross domestic product, science interest, and science achievement: A Person × Nation interaction. Psychological Science, 25, 2047–2057.

24.

Tucker-Drob

E. M.

Harden

K. P.

(2012a). Intellectual interest mediates Gene × Socioeconomic Status interaction on adolescent academic achievement. Child Development, 83, 743–757.

25.

Tucker-Drob

E. M.

Harden

K. P.

(2012b). Learning motivation mediates gene-by-socioeconomic status interaction on mathematics achievement in early childhood. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 37–45.

26.

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2015). World economic situation and prospects 2015. New York, NY: Author.

27.

Vigdor

J. L.

Ladd

H. F.

Martinez

(2014). Scaling the digital divide: Home computer technology and student achievement. Economic Inquiry, 52, 1103–1119.

28.

Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

(2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

, Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91–120). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

29.

The World Bank. (2015a). Adolescent fertility rate (births per 1,000 women ages 15-19). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/sp.ado.tfrt

30.

The World Bank. (2015b). GDP per capita (current US$). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?page=1

31.

The World Bank. (2015c). GINI index. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI?page=1

32.

The World Bank. (2015d). Government expenditure on education (% of GDP). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.XPD.TOTL.GD.ZS?page=1

33.

The World Bank. (2015e). Individuals using the Internet (% of population). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.ZS

34.

The World Bank. (2015f). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS?page=1

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

1.40 MB

0.00 MB

0.58 MB

National Gross Domestic Product,Science Interest,and Science Achievement: A Direct Replication and Extension of the Tucker-Drob,Cheung,and Briley (2014) Study

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material