How detailed are long-term-memory representations compared with working memory representations? Recent research has found an equal fidelity bound for both memory systems, suggesting a novel general constraint on memory. Here, we assessed the replicability of this discovery. Participants (total N = 72) were presented with colored real-life objects and were asked to recall the colors using a continuous color wheel. Deviations from study colors were modeled to generate two estimates of color memory: the variability of remembered colors—fidelity—and the probability of forgetting the color. Estimating model parameters using both maximum-likelihood estimation and Bayesian hierarchical modeling, we found that working memory had better fidelity than long-term memory (Experiments 1 and 2). Furthermore, within each system, fidelity worsened as a function of time-correlated mechanisms (Experiments 2 and 3). We conclude that fidelity is subject to decline across and within memory systems. Thus, the justification for a general fidelity constraint in memory does not seem to be valid.
AdamK. C.VogelE. K.AwhE. (2017). Clear evidence for item limits in visual working memory. Cognitive Psychology, 97, 79–97.
2.
AndersonM. C. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 415–445.
3.
AtkinsonR. C.ShiffrinR. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In SpenceK. W.SpenceJ. T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 90–195). New York, NY: Academic Press.
4.
BaeG. Y.OlkkonenM.AllredS. R.FlombaumJ. I. (2015). Why some colors appear more memorable than others: A model combining categories and particulars in color working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 744–763.
5.
BaysP. M.CatalaoR. F.HusainM. (2009). The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. Journal of Vision, 9(10), Article 7. doi:10.1167/9.10.7
6.
BaysP. M.HusainM. (2008). Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science, 321, 851–854.
7.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B: Methodological, 57, 289–300.
8.
BradyT. F.KonkleT.AlvarezG. A. (2011). A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations. Journal of Vision, 11(5), Article 4. doi:10.1167/11.5.4
9.
BradyT. F.KonkleT.AlvarezG. A.OlivaA. (2008). Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 14325–14329.
10.
BradyT. F.KonkleT.GillJ.OlivaA.AlvarezG. A. (2013). Visual long-term memory has the same limit on fidelity as visual working memory. Psychological Science, 24, 981–990.
11.
BrainardD. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
12.
BrownG. D.NeathI.ChaterN. (2007). A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review, 114, 539–576.
13.
CowanN. (2005). Working memory capacity. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
14.
DavelaarE. J.Goshen-GottsteinY.AshkenaziA.HaarmannH. J.UsherM. (2005). The demise of short-term memory revisited: Empirical and computational investigations of recency effects. Psychological Review, 112, 3–42.
15.
DonkinC.NosofskyR.GoldJ.ShiffrinR. (2015). Verbal labeling, gradual decay, and sudden death in visual short-term memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 170–178.
16.
GelmanA.CarlinJ. B.SternH. S.DunsonD. B.VehtariA.RubinD. B. (2014). Bayesian data analysis (Vol. 2). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
17.
HardmanK. O.VergauweE.RickerT. J. (2017). Categorical working memory representations are used in delayed estimation of continuous colors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 30–54.
18.
HollingworthA. (2004). Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: The roles of short- and long-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 519–537.
19.
HowardM. W.KahanaM. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 269–299.
20.
KelleyK. (2007). Confidence intervals for standardized effect sizes: Theory, application, and implementation. Journal of Statistical Software, 20(8). doi:10.18637/jss.v020.i08
21.
LakensD. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 863. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
22.
LawrenceM. A. (2010). Estimating the probability and fidelity of memory. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 957–968.
23.
LeeM. D.WagenmakersE. J. (2013). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24.
LoftusG. R.MassonM. E. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476–490.
OberauerK. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 411–421.
27.
OberauerK.LinH. Y. (2017). An interference model of visual working memory. Psychological Review, 124, 21–59.
28.
OberauerK.StonekingC.WabersichD.LinH. Y. (2017). Hierarchical Bayesian measurement models for continuous reproduction of visual features from working memory. Journal of Vision, 17(5), Article 11. doi:10.1167/17.5.11
29.
PersaudK.HemmerP. (2016). The dynamics of fidelity over the time course of long-term memory. Cognitive Psychology, 88, 1–21.
30.
PetersB.RahmB.CzoschkeS.BarnesC.KaiserJ.BledowskiC. (2018). Sequential whole report accesses different states in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 588–603.
31.
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
32.
RichterF. R.CooperR. A.BaysP. M.SimonsJ. S. (2016). Distinct neural mechanisms underlie the success, precision, and vividness of episodic memory. eLife, 5, Article e18260. doi:10.7554/eLife.18260
33.
SadehT.OzubkoJ. D.WinocurG.MoscovitchM. (2016). Forgetting patterns differentiate between two forms of memory representation. Psychological Science, 27, 810–820.
34.
SchurginM. W.FlombaumJ. I. (2015). Visual long-term memory has weaker fidelity than working memory. Visual Cognition, 23, 859–862.
35.
SimonsohnU. (2015). Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Psychological Science, 26, 559–569.
36.
SuchowJ. W.BradyT. F.FougnieD.AlvarezG. A. (2013). Modeling visual working memory with the MemToolbox. Journal of Vision, 13(10), Article 9. doi:10.1167/13.10.9
37.
SuttererD. W.AwhE. (2016). Retrieval practice enhances the accessibility but not the quality of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 831–841.
38.
TalmiD.GradyC. L.Goshen-GottsteinY.MoscovitchM. (2005). Neuroimaging the serial position curve: A test of single-store versus dual-store models. Psychological Science, 16, 716–723.
39.
UnderwoodB. J. (1957). Interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 64, 49–60.
40.
Van den BergR.MaW. J. (2014). “Plateau”-related summary statistics are uninformative for comparing working memory models. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 2117–2135.
41.
WilkenP.MaW. J. (2004). A detection theory account of change detection. Journal of Vision, 4(12), Article 11. doi:10.1167/4.12.11
42.
ZhangW.LuckS. J. (2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453, 233–235.
43.
ZhangW.LuckS. J. (2009). Sudden death and gradual decay in visual working memory. Psychological Science, 20, 423–428.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
