People infer the personalities of others from their facial appearance. Whether they do so from body shapes is less studied. We explored personality inferences made from body shapes. Participants rated personality traits for male and female bodies generated with a three-dimensional body model. Multivariate spaces created from these ratings indicated that people evaluate bodies on valence and agency in ways that directly contrast positive and negative traits from the Big Five domains. Body-trait stereotypes based on the trait ratings revealed a myriad of diverse body shapes that typify individual traits. Personality-trait profiles were predicted reliably from a subset of the body-shape features used to specify the three-dimensional bodies. Body features related to extraversion and conscientiousness were predicted with the highest consensus, followed by openness traits. This study provides the first comprehensive look at the range, diversity, and reliability of personality inferences that people make from body shapes.
AbdiH.BéraM. (2014). Correspondence analysis. In AlhajjR.RokneJ. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining (pp. 275–284). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_140-2
2.
AviezerH.TropeY.TodorovA.EkmanP.IzardC. E.CarrollJ. M.. . . FogelA. (2012). Body cues, not facial expressions, discriminate between intense positive and negative emotions. Science, 338, 1225–1229. doi:10.1126/science.1224313
3.
BenzécriJ. P. (1973). L’analyse des données [Data analysis] (Vol. 2). Paris, France: Dunod.
4.
BrodskyC. M. (1954). A study of norms for body form-behavior relationship. Anthropological Quarterly, 27, 91–101.
5.
CarrD.FriedmanM. A. (2005). Is obesity stigmatizing? Body weight, perceived discrimination, and psychological well-being in the United States. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46, 244–259.
6.
CogsdillE. J.TodorovA. T.SpelkeE. S.BanajiM. R. (2014). Inferring character from faces: A developmental study. Psychological Science, 25, 1132–1139. doi:10.1177/0956797614523297
7.
CurrieT. E.LittleA. C. (2009). The relative importance of the face and body in judgments of human physical attractiveness. Evolution & Human Behavior, 30, 409–416. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.06.005
8.
de GelderB.de BorstA. W.WatsonR. (2015). The perception of emotion in body expressions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6, 149–158. doi:10.1002/wcs.1335
9.
de GelderB.HadjikhaniN. (2006). Non-conscious recognition of emotional body language. NeuroReport, 17, 583–586.
10.
EfranM. G. (1974). The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 45–54.
11.
FallonA. E.RozinP. (1985). Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 102–105. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.94.1.102
12.
FarrellC.LeeM.ShafranR. (2005). Assessment of body size estimation: A review. European Eating Disorders Review, 13, 75–88. doi:10.1002/erv.622
13.
FurnhamA.BadminN.SneadeI. (2002). Body image dissatisfaction: Gender differences in eating attitudes, self-esteem, and reasons for exercise. The Journal of Psychology, 13, 581–596. doi:10.1080/00223980209604820
14.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
15.
GreenacreM. (2017). Correspondence analysis in practice (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
16.
HillM. Q.StreuberS.HahnC. A.BlackM. J.O’TooleA. J. (2016). Creating body shapes from verbal descriptions by linking similarity spaces. Psychological Science, 27, 1486–1497. doi:10.1177/0956797616663878
17.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). Big Five inventory (BFI). In PervinL. A. (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press. doi:10.1525/fq.1998.51.4.04a00260
18.
KretschmerE. (1951). Physique and character: An investigation of the nature of constitution and of the theory of temperament. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & Company.
19.
LernerR. M. (1969). Some female stereotypes of male body build-behavior relations. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 28, 363–366.
20.
LoperM.MahmoodN.RomeroJ.Pons-mollG.BlackM. J. (2015). SMPL: A skinned multi-person linear model. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 34(6), Article 248. doi:10.1145/2816795.2818013
21.
OosterhofN. N.TodorovA. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 11087–11092. doi:10.1073/pnas.0805664105
22.
PuhlR. M.HeuerC. A. (2009). The stigma of obesity: A review and update. Obesity, 17, 941–964. doi:10.1038/oby.2008.636
23.
RiceA.PhillipsP. J.NatuV.AnX.O’TooleA. J. (2013). Unaware person recognition from the body when face identification fails. Psychological Science, 24, 2235–2243. doi:10.1177/0956797613492986
24.
RobbinsR. A.ColtheartM. (2012). The effects of inversion and familiarity on face versus body cues to person recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1098–1104. doi:10.1037/a0028584
25.
RobinetteK. M.BlackwellS.DaanenH.BoehmerM.FlemingS.BrillT.. . . BurnsidesD. (2002). Civilian American and European Surface Anthropometry Resource (CAESAR) (Final Report No. 1). Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
26.
RobinetteK. M.DaanenH.PaquetE. (1999). The CAESAR project: A 3-D surface anthropometry survey. In Second International Conference on 3D Digital Imaging and Modeling (Cat. No. PR00062, pp. 380–386). New York, NY: IEEE. doi:10.1109/IM.1999.805368
27.
SheldonW. H. (1954). Atlas of men: A guide for somatotyping the adult male at all ages. New York, NY: Harper.
28.
SheldonW. H.StevensS. S.TuckerW. B. (1940). The varieties of human physique. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
29.
SinghD. (2002). Female mate value at a glance: Relationship of waist-to-hip ratio to health, fecundity and attractiveness. Neuro Endocrinology Letters, 23(Suppl. 4), 81–91.
30.
SinkeC. B. A.KretM. E.de GelderB. (2013). Body language: Embodied perception of emotion. In BerglundB.RossiG. B.TownsendJ. T.PendrillL. R. (Eds.), Measurement with persons: Theory, methods, and implementation areas (pp. 335–353). New York, NY: Psychology Press. doi:10.4324/9780203816660
31.
StreuberS.Quiros-RamirezM. A.HillM. Q.HahnC. A.ZuffiS.O’TooleA.BlackM. J. (2016). Body talk: Crowdshaping realistic 3D avatars with words. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 35(4), Article 54. doi:10.1145/2897824.2925981
32.
StrongmanK. T.HartC. J. (1968). Stereotyped reactions to body build. Psychological Reports, 23(3, Suppl.), 1175–1178.
33.
TodorovA.MandisodzaA. N.GorenA.HallC. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308, 1623–1626. doi:10.1126/science.1110589
34.
TodorovA.PakrashiM.OosterhofN. N. (2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition, 27, 813–833. doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.813
35.
TodorovA.SaidC. P.EngellA. D.OosterhofN. N. (2008). Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 455–460. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.001
36.
WalkerM.VetterT. (2009). Portraits made to measure: Manipulating social judgments about individuals with a statistical face model. Journal of Vision, 9(11), Article 12. doi:10.1167/9.11.12
37.
WellsJ. C.TreleavenP.ColeT. J. (2007). BMI compared with 3-dimensional body shape: The UK National Sizing Survey. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 85, 419–425.
WillisJ.TodorovA. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
40.
YovelG.O’TooleA. J. (2016). Recognizing people in motion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 383–395. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.02.005
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
