The Liking Gap in Conversations: Do People Like Us More Than We Think?

Abstract

Having conversations with new people is an important and rewarding part of social life. Yet conversations can also be intimidating and anxiety provoking, and this makes people wonder and worry about what their conversation partners really think of them. Are people accurate in their estimates? We found that following interactions, people systematically underestimated how much their conversation partners liked them and enjoyed their company, an illusion we call the liking gap. We observed the liking gap as strangers got acquainted in the laboratory, as first-year college students got to know their dorm mates, and as formerly unacquainted members of the general public got to know each other during a personal development workshop. The liking gap persisted in conversations of varying lengths and even lasted for several months, as college dorm mates developed new relationships. Our studies suggest that after people have conversations, they are liked more than they know.

Keywords

interpersonal interaction social perception social interaction meta-perception conversation open data

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alicke

M. D.

(1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621–1630.

Ames

D. R.

Rose

Anderson

C. P.

(2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 440–450.

Bates

Maechler

Bolker

Walker

(2018). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using ‘Eigen’ and S4 (R package version 1.1-7) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html

Beck

L. A.

Clark

M. S.

(2010). Looking a gift horse in the mouth as a defense against increasing intimacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 676–679.

Berenson

K. R.

Gyurak

Ayduk

Ö.

Downey

Garner

M. J.

Mogg

. . . Pine

D. S.

(2009). Rejection sensitivity and disruption of attention by social threat cues. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1064–1072.

Blumberg

H. H.

(1972). Communication of interpersonal evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 157–162.

Brown

Levinson

S. C.

(1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Brozovich

Heimberg

R. G.

(2008). An analysis of post-event processing in social anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 891–903.

Canty

Ripley

(2017). boot: Bootstrap functions (R Package Version 1.3-20) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/boot/index.html

10.

Chartrand

T. L.

Bargh

J. A.

(1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.

11.

Deri

Davidai

Gilovich

(2017). Home alone: Why people believe others’ social lives are richer than their own. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 858–877.

12.

Eisenberger

N. I.

Lieberman

M. D.

Williams

K. D.

(2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290–292.

13.

Epley

Keysar

Van Boven

Gilovich

(2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327–339.

14.

Epley

Schroeder

(2014). Mistakenly seeking solitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1980–1999.

15.

Epstude

Roese

N. J.

(2008). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 168–192.

16.

Garrod

Pickering

M. J.

(2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 8–11.

17.

Gilovich

Kruger

Medvec

V. H.

(2002). The spotlight effect revisited: Overestimating the manifest variability of our actions and appearance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 93–99.

18.

Gilovich

Medvec

V. H.

Savitsky

(1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 332–346.

19.

Kenny

D. A.

DePaulo

B. M.

(1993). Do people know how others view them? An empirical and theoretical account. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 145–161.

20.

Keysar

(2007). Communication and miscommunication: The role of egocentric processes. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4, 71–84.

21.

Kruger

Dunning

(1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121–1134.

22.

Kuznetsova

Brockhoff

P. B.

Christensen

R. H. B.

(2014). lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models (R package version 2.0-3) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/lmerTest.pdf

23.

Lakin

J. L.

Jefferis

V. E.

Cheng

C. M.

Chartrand

T. L.

(2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 145–161.

24.

Lenth

R. V.

(2016). Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69(1). doi:10.18637/jss.v069.i01

25.

Lieberman

M. D.

Rosenthal

(2001). Why introverts can’t always tell who likes them: Multitasking and nonverbal decoding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 294–310.

26.

McCroskey

J. C.

Andersen

J. F.

Richmond

V. P.

Wheeless

L. R.

(1981). Communication apprehension of elementary and secondary students and teachers. Communication Education, 30, 122–132.

27.

Mor

Winquist

(2002). Self-focused attention and negative affect: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 638–662.

28.

Pronin

Kruger

Savitsky

Ross

(2001). You don’t know me, but I know you: The illusion of asymmetric insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 639–656.

29.

R Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

30.

Richardson

D. C.

Dale

Kirkham

N. Z.

(2007). The art of conversation is coordination. Psychological Science, 18, 407–413.

31.

Rosenberg

(1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

32.

Savitsky

Epley

Gilovich

(2001). Do others judge us as harshly as we think? Overestimating the impact of our failures, shortcomings, and mishaps. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 44–56.

33.

Savitsky

Gilovich

(2003). The illusion of transparency and the alleviation of speech anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 618–625.

34.

Schegloff

E. A.

Jefferson

Sacks

(1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.

35.

Schlenker

B. R.

Leary

M. R.

(1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization model. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 641–669.

36.

Stivers

Enfield

N. J.

Brown

Englert

Hayashi

Heinemann

. . . Levinson

S. C.

(2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 10587–10592.

37.

Swann

W. B.

Stein-Seroussi

McNulty

S. E.

(1992). Outcasts in a white-lie society: The enigmatic worlds of people with negative self-conceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 618–624.

38.

Tesser

Rosen

(1975). The reluctance to transmit bad news. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 193–232). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

39.

Van Boven

Loewenstein

Dunning

. (2005). The illusion of courage in social predictions: Underestimating the impact of fear of embarrassment on other people. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 130–141.

40.

Weinstein

(1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806–820.

41.

Whillans

A. V.

Christie

C. D.

Cheung

Jordan

A. H.

Chen

F. S.

(2017). From misperception to social connection: Correlates and consequences of overestimating others’ social connectedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 1696–1711.

42.

Williams

E. F.

Gilovich

Dunning

(2012). Being all that you can be. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 143–154.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.67 MB

0.31 MB