Research over the past decade has shown that various personality traits are communicated through musical preferences. One limitation of that research is external validity, as most studies have assessed individual differences in musical preferences using self-reports of music-genre preferences. Are personality traits communicated through behavioral manifestations of musical preferences? We addressed this question in two large-scale online studies with demographically diverse populations. Study 1 (N = 22,252) shows that reactions to unfamiliar musical excerpts predicted individual differences in personality—most notably, openness and extraversion—above and beyond demographic characteristics. Moreover, these personality traits were differentially associated with particular music-preference dimensions. The results from Study 2 (N = 21,929) replicated and extended these findings by showing that an active measure of naturally occurring behavior, Facebook Likes for musical artists, also predicted individual differences in personality. In general, our findings establish the robustness and external validity of the links between musical preferences and personality.
AbramsD. (2009). Social identity on a national scale: Optimal distinctiveness and young people’s self-expression through musical preference. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations: GPIR, 12, 303–317.
2.
Bonneville-RoussyA.RentfrowP. J.XuM. K.PotterJ. (2013). Music through the ages: Trends in musical engagement and preferences from adolescence through middle adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 703–717.
3.
BrownR. A. (2012). Music preferences and personality among Japanese university students. International Journal of Psychology, 47, 259–268.
4.
BrunerG. C. (1990). Music, mood, and marketing. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 94–104.
5.
CamererC. F.DreberA.ForsellE.HoT.-H.HuberJ.JohannessonM.. . . WuH. (2016). Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics. Science, 351, 1433–1436.
6.
CamererC. F.NaveG.SmithA. (2017). Dynamic unstructured bargaining with private information and deadlines: Theory, experiment, and outcome prediction via machine learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7.
CarterE. C.McCulloughM. E. (2014). Publication bias and the limited strength model of self-control: Has the evidence for ego depletion been overestimated?Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 823. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00823
8.
ChongI.-G.JunC.-H. (2005). Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 78, 103–112.
9.
ColleyA. (2008). Young people’s musical taste: Relationship with gender and gender-related traits. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 2039–2055.
10.
DelsingM. J. M. H.ter BogtT. F. M.EngelsR. C. M. E.MeeusW. H. J. (2008). Adolescents’ music preferences and personality characteristics. European Journal of Personality, 22, 109–130.
11.
GeorgeD.StickleK.RachidF.WopnfordA. (2007). The association between types of music enjoyed and cognitive, behavioral, and personality factors of those who listen. Psychomusicology: A Journal of Research in Music Cognition, 19(2), 32–56.
12.
GoldbergL. R.JohnsonJ. A.EberH. W.HoganR.AshtonM. C.CloningerC. R.GoughH. G. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96.
13.
GreenbergD. M.Baron-CohenS.StillwellD. J.KosinskiM.RentfrowP. J. (2015). Musical preferences are linked to cognitive styles. PLOS One, 10(7), Article e0131151. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131151
14.
GreenbergD. M.KosinskiM.StillwellD. J.MonteiroB. L.LevitinD. J.RentfrowP. J. (2016). The song is you: Preferences for musical attribute dimensions reflect personality. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 7, 597–605.
15.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.
16.
KosinskiM.StillwellD.GraepelT. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 5802–5805.
17.
LaneA.LuminetO.NaveG.MikolajczakM. (2016). Is there a publication bias in behavioural intranasal oxytocin research on humans? Opening the file drawer of one laboratory. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 28(4). doi:10.1111/jne.12384
18.
LangmeyerA.Guglhör-RudanA.TarnaiC. (2012). What do music preferences reveal about personality?Journal of Individual Differences, 33, 119–130.
19.
LindenbaumO.MaskitS.KutielO.NaveG. (2010, December). Musical features extraction for audio-based search. Paper presented at the IEEE 26th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Israel. doi:10.1109/EEEI.2010.5661916
20.
LoganB. (2000). Mel frequency cepstral coefficients for music modeling. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Music Information Retrieval, Plymouth, Massachusetts. Retrieved from http://ismir2000.ismir.net/
MatzS. C.KosinskiM.NaveG.StillwellD. (2017). Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114, 12714–12719. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710966114
23.
MirandaD.ClaesM. (2008). Personality traits, music preferences and depression in adolescence. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 14, 277–298.
24.
NaveG.CamererC.McCulloughM. (2015). Does oxytocin increase trust in humans? A critical review of research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 772–789.
25.
NosekB. A.AlterG.BanksG. C.BorsboomD.BowmanS. D.BrecklerS. J.. . . YarkoniT. (2015). Scientific standards: Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348, 1422–1425.
26.
OgdenJ. R.OgdenD. T.LongK. (2011). Music marketing: A history and landscape. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18, 120–125.
27.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716.
28.
PalmerS. E.GriscomW. S. (2013). Accounting for taste: Individual differences in preference for harmony. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 453–461.
29.
ReiseS. P.MooreT. M.HavilandM. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544–559.
30.
RentfrowP. J.GoldbergL. R.LevitinD. J. (2011). The structure of musical preferences: A five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1139–1157.
31.
RentfrowP. J.GoldbergL. R.StillwellD. J.KosinskiM.GoslingS. D.LevitinD. J. (2012). The song remains the same: A replication and extension of the MUSIC model. Music Perception, 30, 161–185.
32.
RentfrowP. J.GoslingS. D. (2003). The do re mi’s of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1236–1256.
33.
RentfrowP. J.McDonaldJ. A.OldmeadowJ. A. (2009). You are what you listen to: Young people’s stereotypes about music fans. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 329–344.
SaarikallioS.ErkkiläJ. (2007). The role of music in adolescents’ mood regulation. Psychology of Music, 35, 88–109.
36.
SchäferT.MehlhornC. (2017). Can personality traits predict musical style preferences? A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 265–273.
37.
SchäferT.SedlmeierP. (2009). From the functions of music to music preference. Psychology of Music, 37, 279–300.
38.
SimonsD. J. (2014). The value of direct replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 76–80.
39.
SteigerJ. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251.
40.
StoneM. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Statistical Methodology, 36(2), 111–147.
41.
TibshiraniR. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Statistical Methodology, 58(1), 267–288.
42.
VuoskoskiJ. K.EerolaT. (2011). The role of mood and personality in the perception of emotions represented by music. Cortex, 47, 1099–1106.
43.
YarkoniT.WestfallJ. (2017). Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: Lessons from machine learning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1100–1122.
44.
YeohJ. P. S.NorthA. C. (2010). The effect of musical fit on consumers’ memory. Psychology of Music, 38, 368–378.
45.
YouyouW.KosinskiM.StillwellD. (2015). Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112, 1036–1040.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
