A growing number of studies have linked facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) with various antisocial or violent behavioral tendencies. However, those studies have predominantly been laboratory based and low powered. This work reexamined the links between fWHR and behavioral tendencies in a large sample of 137,163 participants. Behavioral tendencies were measured using 55 well-established psychometric scales, including self-report scales measuring intelligence, domains and facets of the five-factor model of personality, impulsiveness, sense of fairness, sensational interests, self-monitoring, impression management, and satisfaction with life. The findings revealed that fWHR is not substantially linked with any of these self-reported measures of behavioral tendencies, calling into question whether the links between fWHR and behavior generalize beyond the small samples and specific experimental settings that have been used in past fWHR research.
AnderlC.HahnT.SchmidtA. K.MoldenhauerH.NotebaertK.ClémentC. C.WindmannS. (2016). Facial width-to-height ratio predicts psychopathic traits in males. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 99–101. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.057
2.
BirdB. M.Cid JofréV. S.GenioleS. N.WelkerK. M.ZilioliS.MaestripieriD.. . . CarréJ. M. (2016). Does the facial width-to-height ratio map onto variability in men’s testosterone concentrations?Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 392–398. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.03.004
3.
CarréJ. M.McCormickC. M. (2008). In your face: Facial metrics predict aggressive behaviour in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 2651–2656. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0873
4.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
5.
EganV.AutyJ.MillerR.AhmadiS.RichardsonC.GarganI. (1999). Sensational interests and general personality traits. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 10, 567–582. doi:10.1080/09585189908402160
6.
EganV.CampbellV. (2009). Sensational interests, sustaining fantasies and personality predict physical aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 464–469. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.021
7.
GelmanA.LokenE. (2014). The statistical crisis in science: Data-dependent analysis—a “garden of forking paths”—explains why many statistically significant comparisons don’t hold up. American Scientist, 102, 460–465. doi:10.1511/2014.111.460
8.
GenioleS. N.KeyesA. E.CarréJ. M.McCormickC. M. (2014). Fearless dominance mediates the relationship between the facial width-to-height ratio and willingness to cheat. Personality and Individual Differences, 57, 59–64. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.09.023
9.
GiancolaP. R.ZeichnerA. (1994). Intellectual ability and aggressive behavior in nonclinical-nonforensic males. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 16, 121–130. doi:10.1007/BF02232723
10.
GoldbergL. R.JohnsonJ. A.EberH. W.HoganR.AshtonM. C.CloningerC. R.GoughH. G. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
11.
HaselhuhnM. P.WongE. M. (2012). Bad to the bone: Facial structure predicts unethical behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 571–576. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1193
HehmanE.LeitnerJ. B.DeeganM. P.GaertnerS. L. (2013). Facial structure is indicative of explicit support for prejudicial beliefs. Psychological Science, 24, 289–296. doi:10.1177/0956797612451467
14.
HuesmannL. R.EronL. D.YarmelP. W. (1987). Intellectual functioning and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 232–240. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.232
15.
JonesG. (2008). Are smarter groups more cooperative? Evidence from prisoner’s dilemma experiments, 1959–2003. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68, 489–497. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2008.06.010
16.
KosinskiM.MatzS. C.GoslingS. D.PopovV.StillwellD. J. (2015). Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences: Opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines. American Psychologist, 70, 543–556. doi:10.1037/a0039210
17.
KosinskiM.StillwellD. J.GraepelT. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 5802–5805. doi:10.1073/pnas.1218772110
18.
LefevreC. E.WilsonV. A. D.MortonF. B.BrosnanS. F.PauknerA.BatesT. C. (2014). Facial width-to-height ratio relates to alpha status and assertive personality in capuchin monkeys. PLOS ONE, 9(4), Article e93369. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093369
19.
OzerD. J.Benet-MartínezV. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127
20.
PattonJ. H.StanfordM. S.BarrattE. S. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768–774. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::AID-JCLP2270510607>3.0.CO;2-1
21.
RavenJ. C. (2008). Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices Plus, Sets A–E. London, England: Pearson Clinical Assessment.
22.
RustJ.GolombokS. (1989). Modern psychometrics: The science of psychological assessment. London, England: Routledge.
23.
SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279. doi:10.1177/1088868308319226
24.
SnyderM. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537. doi:10.1037/h0037039
25.
StanfordM. S.MathiasC. W.DoughertyD. M.LakeS. L.AndersonN. E.PattonJ. H. (2009). Fifty years of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale: An update and review. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 385–395. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.008
26.
StirratM.PerrettD. I. (2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21, 349–354. doi: 10.1177/0956797610362647
27.
StirratM.PerrettD. I. (2012). Face structure predicts cooperation: Men with wider faces are more generous to their in-group when out-group competition is salient. Psychological Science, 23, 718–722. doi:10.1177/0956797611435133
28.
WestonE. M.FridayA. E.LiòP. (2007). Biometric evidence that sexual selection has shaped the hominin face. PLOS ONE, 2(8), Article e710. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000710
29.
WhitehouseA. J. O.GilaniS. Z.ShafaitF.MianA.TanD. W.MayberyM. T.. . . EastwoodP. (2015). Prenatal testosterone exposure is related to sexually dimorphic facial morphology in adulthood. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20151351. doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.1351
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
