Efficiency of Executive Function: A Two-Generation Cross-Cultural Comparison of Samples From Hong Kong and the United Kingdom

Abstract

Although Asian preschoolers acquire executive functions (EFs) earlier than their Western counterparts, little is known about whether this advantage persists into later childhood and adulthood. To address this gap, in the current study we gave four computerized EF tasks (providing measures of inhibition, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and planning) to a large sample (n = 1,427) of 9- to 16-year-olds and their parents. All participants lived in either the United Kingdom or Hong Kong. Our findings highlight the importance of combining developmental and cultural perspectives and show both similarities and contrasts across sites. Specifically, adults’ EF performance did not differ between the two sites; age-related changes in executive function for both the children and the parents appeared to be culturally invariant, as did a modest intergenerational correlation. In contrast, school-age children and young adolescents in Hong Kong outperformed their United Kingdom counterparts on all four EF tasks, a difference consistent with previous findings from preschool children.

Keywords

executive functions cross-cultural research inhibition working memory cognitive flexibility planning open data open materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akshoomoff

Newman

Thompson

W. K.

McCabe

Bloss

C. S.

Chang

. . . Jernigan

T. L.

(2014). The NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery: Results from a large normative developmental sample (PING). Neuropsychology, 28, 1–10. doi:10.1037/neu0000001

Astill

R. G.

van der Heijden

K. B.

van IJzendoorn

M. H.

van Someren

E. J. W.

(2012). Sleep, cognition, and behavioral problems in school-age children: A century of research meta-analyzed. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1109–1138. doi:10.1037/a0028204

Belsky

de Haan

(2011). Annual research review: Parenting and children’s brain development: The end of the beginning. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 409–428. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02281.X

Bernier

Beauchamp

M. H.

Carlson

S. M.

Lalonde

(2015). A secure base from which to regulate: Attachment security in toddlerhood as a predictor of executive functioning at school entry. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1177–1189. doi:10.1037/dev0000032

Bialystok

Craik

F. I.

Green

D. W.

Gollan

T. H.

(2009). Bilingual minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10, 89–129. doi:10.1177/1529100610387084

Brown

E. D.

Ackerman

B. P.

Moore

C. A.

(2013). Family adversity and inhibitory control for economically disadvantaged children: Preschool relations and associations with school readiness. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 443–452. doi:10.1037/a0032886

Bull

Lee

(2014). Executive functioning and mathematics achievement. Child Development Perspectives, 8, 36–41. doi:10.1111/cdep.12059

Carlson

S. M.

Mandell

D. J.

Williams

(2004). Executive function and theory of mind: Stability and prediction from ages 2 to 3. Developmental Psychology, 40, 1105–1122. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1105

Corsi

P. M.

(1972). Memory and the medial temporal area of the brain (Doctoral thesis). McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

10.

Cuevas

Deater-Deckard

Kim-Spoon

Wang

Morasch

K. C.

Bell

M.-A.

(2014). A longitudinal intergenerational analysis of executive functions during early childhood. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32, 50–64. doi:10.1111/bjdp.12021

11.

Devine

R. T.

Hughes

(2013). Silent films and strange stories: Theory of mind, gender, and social experiences in middle childhood. Child Development, 84, 989–1003. doi:10.1111/cdev.12017

12.

Dumontheil

Burgess

Blakemore

S.-J.

(2008). Development of rostral prefrontal cortex and cognitive and behavioural disorders. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 50, 168–181. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.02026.X

13.

Ellefson

Shapiro

Chater

(2006). Asymmetrical switch costs in children. Cognitive Development, 21, 108–130. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.01.002

14.

Fitzpatrick

McKinnon

R. D.

Blair

C. B.

Willoughby

M. T.

(2014). Do preschool executive function skills explain the school readiness gap between advantaged and disadvantaged children? Learning and Instruction, 30, 25–31. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.11.003

15.

Hughes

(2011). Changes and challenges in 20 years of research into the development of executive functions. Infant and Child Development, 20, 251–271. doi:10.1002/icd.736

16.

Hughes

Devine

R. T.

Ensor

Koyasu

Mizokawa

Lecce

(2014). Lost in translation? Comparing British, Japanese and Italian children’s theory-of-mind performance. Child Development Research, 2014, Article 893492. doi:10.1155/2014/893492

17.

Hughes

Devine

R. T.

Wang

(2017). Does parental mind-mindedness account for cross-cultural differences in preschoolers’ theory of mind? Child Development. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/cdev.12746

18.

Hughes

Ensor

Wilson

Graham

(2010). Tracking executive function across the transition to school: A latent variable approach. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35, 20–36. doi:10.1080/87565640903325691

19.

Hughes

Roman

Ensor

(2014). Parenting and executive function: Positive and negative influences. In Landry

S. H.

Cooper

C. L.

(Eds.), Wellbeing: A complete reference guide: Vol. 1. Wellbeing in children and families (pp. 131–156). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.

20.

Hughes

Roman

Hart

M. J.

Ensor

(2013). Does maternal depression predict young children’s executive function?—a 4-year longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 169–177. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12014

21.

Imada

Carlson

S. M.

Itakura

(2013). East–West cultural differences in context-sensitivity are evident in early childhood. Developmental Science, 16, 198–208. doi:10.1111/desc.12016

22.

Imbo

LeFevre

J.-A.

(2009). Cultural differences in complex addition: Efficient Chinese versus adaptive Belgians and Canadians. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1465–1476. doi:10.1037/a0017022

23.

Kudo

M. F.

Lussier

C. M.

Swanson

H. L.

(2015). Reading disabilities in children: A selective meta-analysis of the cognitive literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 51–62. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2015.01.002

24.

Kuwabara

Smith

L. B.

(2012). Cross-cultural differences in cognitive development: Attention to relations and objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 20–35. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.04.009

25.

Lewis

Koyasu

Ogawa

Short

Huang

(2009). Culture, executive function, and social understanding. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development, 2009(123), 69–85. doi:10.1002/cd.236

26.

Logan

G. D.

(1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users’ guide to the stop signal paradigm. In Dagenbach

Carr

T. H.

(Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 189–239). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

27.

Miyake

Friedman

N. P.

Emerson

M. J.

Witzki

A. H.

Howerter

Wager

T. D.

(2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.575

28.

Nisbett

R. E.

Choi

Peng

Norenzayan

(2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–301. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291

29.

Raven

J. C.

Court

J. H

. (1998). Raven manual: Section 3. Standard progressive matrices. Oxford, England: Oxford Psychologists Press.

30.

Reimers

Maylor

E. A.

(2005). Task switching across the life span: Effects of age on general and specific switch costs. Developmental Psychology, 41, 661–671. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.661

31.

Rogers

R. D.

Monsell

(1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231.

32.

Sabbagh

M. A.

Carlson

S. M.

Moses

L. J.

Lee

(2006). The development of executive functioning and theory of mind: A comparison of Chinese and U.S. preschoolers. Psychological Science, 17, 74–81. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01667.X

33.

Schoemaker

Mulder

Deković

(2013). Executive functions in preschool children with externalizing behavior problems: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 457–471. doi:10.1007/s10802-012-9684-X

34.

Tardif

Wang

Olson

S. L.

(2009). Culture and the development of regulatory competence: Chinese-U.S. comparisons. In Olson

S. L.

Sameroff

A. J.

(Eds.), Biopsycho-social regulatory processes in the development of child-hood behavior problems (pp. 258–289). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511575877.012

35.

Wang

Devine

R. T.

Wong

K. K.

Hughes

(2016). Theory of mind and executive function in middle childhood across cultures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 149, 6–22. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.028

36.

Welsh

(1991). Rule-guided behavior and self-monitoring on the tower of hanoi disk-transfer task. Cognitive Development, 6, 59–76.

37.

Wiebe

S. A.

Espy

K. A.

Charak

(2008). Using confirmatory factor analysis to understand executive control in preschool children: I. Latent structure. Developmental Psychology, 44, 575–587. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.575

38.

Barr

D. J.

Gann

T. M.

Keysar

(2013). How culture influences perspective taking: Differences in correction, not integration. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 822. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00822

39.

Keysar

(2007). The effect of culture on perspective taking. Psychological Science, 18, 600–606. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01946.X

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB