Long-term collaborative relationships require that any jointly produced resources be shared in mutually satisfactory ways. Prototypically, this sharing involves partners dividing up simultaneously available resources, but sometimes the collaboration makes a resource available to only one individual, and any sharing of resources must take place across repeated instances over time. Here, we show that beginning at 5 years of age, human children stabilize cooperation in such cases by taking turns across instances of obtaining a resource. In contrast, chimpanzees do not take turns in this way, and so their collaboration tends to disintegrate over time. Alternating turns in obtaining a collaboratively produced resource does not necessarily require a prosocial concern for the other, but rather requires only a strategic judgment that partners need incentives to continue collaborating. These results suggest that human beings are adapted for thinking strategically in ways that sustain long-term cooperative relationships and that are absent in their nearest primate relatives.
BoeschC.Boesch-AchermannH. (2000). The chimpanzees of the Taï Forest. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
2.
BoysenS. T.BerntsonG. G.HannanM. B.CacioppoJ. T. (1996). Quantity-based interference and symbolic representations in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 76–86.
3.
BrosnanS. F.de WaalF. B. M. (2014). Evolution of responses to (un)fairness. Science, 346, Article 125776. doi:10.1126/science.1251776
4.
BrosnanS. F.SilkJ. B.HenrichJ.MarenoM. C.LambethS. P.SchapiroS. J. (2009). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) do not develop contingent reciprocity in an experimental task. Animal Cognition, 12, 587–597.
5.
BrownellC. A.SvetlovaM.NicholsS. (2009). To share or not to share: When do toddlers respond to another’s needs?Infancy, 14, 117–130.
6.
CarlsonS. M.DavisA. C.LeachJ. G. (2005). Less is more: Executive function and symbolic representation in preschool children. Psychological Science, 16, 609–616.
7.
de WaalF. B. M. (1997). The chimpanzee’s service economy: Food for grooming. Evolution & Human Behavior, 18, 375–386.
8.
de WaalF. B. M. (2000). Attitudinal reciprocity in food sharing among brown capuchin monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 60, 253–261.
9.
de WaalF. B. M. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279–300.
10.
DufourV.SterckE. H. M. (2008). Chimpanzees fail to plan in an exchange task but succeed in a tool-using procedure. Behavioural Processes, 79, 19–27.
11.
EngelmannJ. M.OverH.HerrmannE.TomaselloM. (2013). Young children care more about their reputation with ingroup members and potential reciprocators. Developmental Science, 16, 952–958.
12.
EversE.de VriesH.SpruijtB. M.SterckE. H. M. (2015). Emotional bookkeeping and high partner selectivity are necessary for the emergence of partner-specific reciprocal affiliation in an agent-based model of primate groups. PLoS ONE, 10(3), Article e0118921. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118921
13.
GomesC. M.MundryR.BoeschC. (2009). Long-term reciprocation of grooming in wild West African chimpanzees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 699–706.
14.
HamannK.WarnekenF.GreenbergJ. R.TomaselloM. (2011). Collaboration encourages equal sharing in children but not in chimpanzees. Nature, 476, 328–331.
15.
HareB.MelisA. P.WoodsV.HastingsS.WranghamR. (2007). Tolerance allows bonobos to outperform chimpanzees on a cooperative task. Current Biology, 17, 619–623.
16.
HouseB.HenrichJ.SarneckaB.SilkJ. B. (2013). The development of contingent reciprocity in children. Evolution & Human Behavior, 34, 86–93.
17.
LevittM. J.WeberR. A.ClarkM. C.McDonnellP. (1985). Reciprocity of exchange in toddler sharing behavior. Developmental Psychology, 21, 122–123.
18.
McCormackT.AtanceC. M. (2011). Planning in young children: A review and synthesis. Developmental Review, 31, 1–31.
19.
MelisA. P.HareB.TomaselloM. (2006a). Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science, 311, 1297–1300.
20.
MelisA. P.HareB.TomaselloM. (2006b). Engineering cooperation in chimpanzees: Tolerance constraints on cooperation. Animal Behaviour, 72, 275–286.
21.
MelisA. P.HareB.TomaselloM. (2008). Do chimpanzees reciprocate received favors?Animal Behaviour, 76, 951–962.
22.
MelisA. P.HareB.TomaselloM. (2009). Chimpanzees coordinate in a negotiation game. Evolution & Human Behavior, 30, 381–392.
23.
MelisA. P.TomaselloM. (2013). Chimpanzees’ (Pan troglodytes) strategic helping in a collaborative task. Biology Letters, 9, Article 2013009. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0009
24.
MelisA. P.WarnekenF.JensenK.SchneiderA.CallJ.TomaselloM. (2011). Chimpanzees help conspecifics to obtain food and non-food items. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 1405–1413.
25.
MitaniJ. C. (2006). Reciprocal exchange in chimpanzees and other primates. InKappelerP. M.van SchaikC. P. (Eds.), Cooperation in primates and humans: Mechanisms and evolution (pp. 107–119). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
26.
MullerM. N.MitaniJ. C. (2005). Conflict and cooperation in wild chimpanzees. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 35, 275–331.
27.
NeillD. B. (2003). Cooperation and coordination in the Turn-Taking Dilemma. In M. Tennenholtz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (pp. 231–244). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
28.
NowakM. A.SigmundK. (1994). The alternating Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 168, 219–226.
29.
OlsonK. R.SpelkeE. S. (2008). Foundations of cooperation in young children. Cognition, 108, 222–231.
30.
RawlsJ. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
RobbinsE.RochatP. (2011). Emerging signs of strong reciprocity in human ontogeny. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 353. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00353
32.
RochatP.DiasM. D. G.GuoL.BroeschT.Passos-FerreiraC.WinningA.BergB. (2009). Fairness in distributive justice by 3- and 5-year-olds across seven cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 416–442.
33.
SchinoG.AureliF. (2009). Reciprocal altruism in primates: Partner choice, cognition, and emotions. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 39, 45–69.
34.
Sebastian-EnescoC.WarnekenM. (2015). The shadow of the future: 5-year-olds, but not 3-year-olds, adjust their sharing in anticipation of reciprocation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 129, 40–54.
35.
StevensJ. R.HauserM. D. (2004). Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 60–65.
36.
TomaselloM. (2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37.
WarnekenF.GrafenhainM.TomaselloM. (2012). Collaborative partner or social tool? New evidence for young children’s understanding of joint intentions in collaborative activities. Developmental Science, 15, 54–61.
38.
WarnekenF.HareB.MelisA. P.HanusD.TomaselloM. (2007). Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS Biology, 5, Article 184. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050184
39.
WarnekenF.TomaselloM. (2013). The emergence of contingent reciprocity in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 338–350.
40.
YamamotoS.HumleT.TanakaM. (2009). Chimpanzees help each other upon request. PLoS ONE, 4(10), Article e7416. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007416
41.
YamamotoS.TanakaM. (2009a). Do chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) spontaneously take turns in a reciprocal cooperation task?Journal of Comparative Psychology, 123, 242–249.
42.
YamamotoS.TanakaM. (2009b). Selfish strategies develop in social problem situations in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) mother–infant pairs. Animal Cognition, 12(Suppl. 1), S27–S36.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
