Extraverts are better than introverts at building rapport, but it remains unknown what they do behaviorally to better connect with other individuals. We hypothesized that extraverts mimic more than introverts as a way to build rapport; however, we predicted that this social skillfulness of extraverts emerges only when they are motivated to affiliate. In Study 1, we found that extraversion predicted increased mimicry when an affiliation goal was present, but not when an affiliation goal was absent. In Study 2, we found that mimicry mediates the relationship between extraversion and rapport, but only when an affiliation goal is present. Our findings are the first to identify a behavior that extraverts engage in that helps them build rapport. Furthermore, our studies show that this skillfulness of extraverts emerges only when they are motivated to affiliate, providing evidence in favor of the reward-sensitivity-as-core model of extraversion over the sociability-as-core model of extraversion.
ArgyleM.LuL. (1990a). Happiness and social skills. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1255–1261.
2.
ArgyleM.LuL. (1990b). The happiness of extraverts. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1011–1017.
3.
BackM. D.SchmukleS. C.EgloffB. (2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 533–548. doi:10.1037/a0016229
4.
BarrettL. F.PietromonacoP. R. (1997). Accuracy of the five-factor model in predicting perceptions of daily social interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1173–1187. doi:10.1177/01461672972311005
5.
BarrickM. R.DustinS. L.GilukT. L.StewartG. L.ShafferJ. A.SwiderB. W. (2012). Candidate characteristics driving initial impressions during rapport building: Implications for employment interview validity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 330–352. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02036.x
6.
BernieriF. J.GillisJ. S.GraheJ. E.DavisJ. M. (1996). Dyad rapport and the accuracy of its judgment across situations: A lens model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 110–129.
7.
BerryD. S.HansenJ. S. (2000). Personality, nonverbal behavior, and interaction quality in female dyads. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 278–292. doi:10.1177/0146167200265002
8.
BorkenauP.MauerN.RiemannR.SpinathF. M.AngleitnerA. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599–614. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.599
9.
CanliT.SiversH.WhitfieldS. L.GotlibI. H.GabrieliJ. D. E. (2002). Amygdala response to happy faces as a function of extraversion. Science, 296, 2191.
10.
ChartrandT. L.BarghJ. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.
11.
ChengC. M.ChartrandT. L. (2003). Self-monitoring without awareness: Using mimicry as a nonconscious affiliation strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1170–1179.
12.
CicchettiD. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290.
13.
CohenM. X.YoungJ.BaekJ.-M.KesslerC.RanganathC. (2005). Individual differences in extraversion and dopamine genetics predict neural reward responses. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 851–861. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.018
14.
CooperM. L.AgochaV. B.SheldonM. S. (2000). A motivational perspective on risky behaviors: The role of personality and affect regulatory processes. Journal of Personality, 68, 1059–1088.
15.
DepueR. A.CollinsP. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion [Target article and commentaries]. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 491–569.
16.
DeYoungC. G.HirshJ. B.ShaneM. S.PapademetrisX.RajeevanN.GrayJ. R. (2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: Brain structures and the Big Five. Psychological Science, 21, 820–828. doi:10.1177/0956797610370159
17.
DuffyK. A.StantonS. J.ChartrandT. L.HarrisL. T. (2015). Recovering from social rejection: Behavioral and hormonal mechanisms of affiliation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18.
EatonL. G.FunderD. C. (2003). The creation and consequences of the social world: An interactional analysis of extraversion. European Journal of Personality, 17, 375–395.
19.
FeldsteinS.SloanB. (1984). Actual and stereotyped speech tempos of extraverts and introverts. Journal of Personality, 52, 188–204.
20.
FleesonW.GallagherP. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097–1114. doi:10.1037/a0016786
21.
FunderD. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197–221. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.197
22.
FurnhamA.ChengH. (1999). Personality as predictor of mental health and happiness in the East and West. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 395–403.
23.
GrayJ. A. (1973). Causal models of personality and how to test them. In RoyceJ. R. (Ed.), Multivariate analysis and psychological theory (pp. 409–463). London, England: Academic Press.
24.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
JeffreysH. (1961). Theory of probability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26.
La FranceB. H.HeiselA. D.BeattyM. J. (2004). Is there empirical evidence for a nonverbal profile of extraversion?: A meta-analysis and critique of the literature. Communication Monographs, 71, 28–48. doi:10.1080/03634520410001693148
27.
LakinJ. L.ChartrandT. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14, 334–339. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.14481
28.
LakinJ. L.ChartrandT. L.ArkinR. M. (2008). I am too just like you: Nonconscious mimicry as an automatic behavioral response to social exclusion. Psychological Science, 19, 816–822.
29.
LakinJ. L.JefferisV. E.ChengC. M.ChartrandT. L. (2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 145–162.
30.
LiuP. J.GleibsI. H.ChartrandT. L.ShihM. (2015). “Do you speak English?” Denial of the U.S. American identity leads Asian Americans to nonconsciously mimic a prototypical white American. Manuscript in preparation, Marketing Department, Duke University, Durham, NC.
31.
LucasR. E.DienerE.GrobA.SuhE. M.ShaoL. (2000). Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 452–468.
32.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81
33.
McGrawK. O.WongS. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30–46.
34.
MehlM. R.GoslingS. D.PennebakerJ. W. (2006). Personality in its natural habitat: Manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 862–877. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.862
35.
RachlJ.LeanderN. P. (2015). Smooth moves: Creating and sustaining social smoothness through nonverbal behavioral mimicry. Manuscript in preparation, Psychology Department, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
36.
RachlJ.LeanderN. P.Van YperenN. W. (2015). Lulled in complacency: Nonverbal behavioral mimicry biases people’s course of action. Unpublished manuscript, Psychology Department, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
37.
RauchS. L.MiladM. R.OrrS. P.QuinnB. T.FischlB.PitmanR. K. (2005). Orbitofrontal thickness, retention of fear extinction, and extraversion. NeuroReport, 16, 1909–1912.
38.
RiggioR. E.FriedmanH. S. (1986). Impression formation: The role of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 421–427.
39.
RouderJ. N.SpeckmanP. L.SunD.MoreyR. D.IversonG. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225–237. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
40.
SaucierG. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s Unipolar Big-Five Markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–516.
41.
SchererK. R. (1978). Personality inference from voice quality: The loud voice of extraversion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 467–487.
42.
SmillieL. D.CooperA. J.WiltJ.RevelleW. (2012). Do extraverts get more bang for the buck? Refining the affective-reactivity hypothesis of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 306–326. doi:10.1037/a0028372
43.
SmillieL. D.GeaneyJ. T.WiltJ.CooperA. J.RevelleW. (2013). Aspects of extraversion are unrelated to pleasant affective-reactivity: Further examination of the affective-reactivity hypothesis. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 580–587. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.04.008
44.
SmillieL. D.WiltJ.KabbaniR.GarrattC.RevelleW. (2015). Quality of social experience explains the relation between extraversion and positive affect. Emotion, 15, 339–349.
45.
ThorneA. (1987). The press of personality: A study of conversations between introverts and extraverts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 718–726.
46.
WiltJ.RevelleW. (2009). Extraversion. In LearyM.HoyleR. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 27–45). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
