We tested whether affiliating beer brands with universities enhances the incentive salience of those brands for underage drinkers. In Study 1, 128 undergraduates viewed beer cues while event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded. Results showed that beer cues paired with in-group backgrounds (logos for students’ universities) evoked an enhanced P3 ERP component, a neural index of incentive salience. This effect varied according to students’ levels of identification with their university, and the amplitude of the P3 response prospectively predicted alcohol use over 1 month. In Study 2 (N = 104), we used a naturalistic advertisement exposure to experimentally create in-group brand associations and found that this manipulation caused an increase in the incentive salience of the beer brand. These data provide the first evidence that marketing beer via affiliating it with students’ universities enhances the incentive salience of the brand for underage students and that this effect has implications for their alcohol involvement.
AartsH.VerplankenB.van KnippenbergA. (1998). Predicting behavior from actions in the past: Repeated decision making or a matter of habit?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1355–1374.
2.
American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. (2006). Guideline 5: Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 23, 107–110.
3.
AshmoreR. D.Del BocaF. K.BeebeM. (2002). “Alkie,” “frat brother,” and “jock”: Perceived types of college students and stereotypes about drinking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 885–907. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00247.x
4.
BartholowB. D.HenryE. A.LustS. A. (2007). Effects of alcohol sensitivity on P3 event-related potential reactivity to alcohol cues. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21, 555–563.
5.
BartholowB. D.LustS. A.TragesserS. (2010). Specificity of P3 event-related potential reactivity to alcohol cues in individuals low in alcohol sensitivity. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24, 220–228.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
7.
BegleiterH.PorjeszB.ChouC. L.AunonJ. I. (1983). P3 and stimulus incentive value. Psychophysiology, 20, 95–101.
8.
BergkvistL.Bech-LarsenT. (2010). Two studies of consequences and actionable antecedents of brand love. Journal of Brand Management, 17, 504–518.
9.
BrewerM. B. (2008). Depersonalized trust and ingroup cooperation. In KruegerJ. I. (Ed.), Rationality and social responsibility: Essays in honor of Robyn Mason Dawes (pp. 215–232). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
10.
CaporaelL. R.BaronR. M. (1997). Groups as the mind’s natural environment. In SimpsonJ. A.KenrickD. T. (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 317–343). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth. (2010). Youth exposure to alcohol advertising on television. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
12.
CialdiniR. B.BordenR. J.ThorneA.WalkerM. R.FreemanS.SloanL. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366–375.
13.
CohenJ. E. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
CornwellT. B.CooteL. V. (2005). Corporate sponsorship of a cause: The role of identification in purchase intent. Journal of Business Research, 58, 268–276.
15.
CorrellJ.ParkB. (2005). A model of the ingroup as a social resource. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 341–359.
16.
DickterC. L.BartholowB. D. (2007). Racial ingroup and outgroup attention biases revealed by event-related brain potentials. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 189–198.
17.
FrommeK.StrootE.KaplanD. (1993). Comprehensive effects of alcohol: Development and psychometric assessment of a new expectancy questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 5, 19–26.
18.
KawakamiK.WilliamsA.SidhuD.ChomaB. L.Rodriguez-BailónR.CañadasE., . . . HugenbergK. (2014). An eye for the I: Preferential attention to the eyes of ingroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 1–20.
19.
KristjanssonS. D.KircherJ. C.WebbA. K. (2007). Multilevel models for repeated measures research designs in psychophysiology: An introduction to growth curve modeling. Psychophysiology, 44, 728–736.
20.
LakinJ. L.ChartrandT. L.ArkinR. M. (2008). I am too just like you: Nonconscious mimicry as an automatic behavioral response to social exclusion. Psychological Science, 19, 816–822.
21.
LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (2008). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. Gainesville: Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
22.
LittelM.EuserA. S.MunafòM. R.FrankenI. H. A. (2012). Electrophysiological indices of biased cognitive processing of substance-related cues: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 1803–1816.
23.
LittenR. Z.RyanM. L.FalkD. E.ReillyM.FertigJ. B.KoobG. F. (2015). Heterogeneity of alcohol use disorder: Understanding mechanisms to advance personalized treatment. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 39, 579–584.
24.
LoerschC.AartsH.PayneB. K.JefferisV. E. (2008). The influence of social groups on goal contagion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1555–1558.
25.
LoerschC.ArbuckleN. L. (2013). Unraveling the mystery of music: Music as an evolved group process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 777–789.
26.
LoerschC.BartholowB. D. (2011). The color of safety: Ingroup associated colors make beer safer. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 190–194.
27.
LoerschC.ItoT. A.Volpert-EsmondH. I.BartholowB. D. (2017). Ingroup affiliation enhances visual attention bias to alcohol-related cues. Manuscript in preparation.
28.
MaassA.CeccarelliR.RudinS. (1996). Linguistic intergroup bias: Evidence for in-group-protective motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 512–526.
29.
MillerE. T.NealD. J.RobertsL. J.BaerJ. S.CresslerS. O.MetrikJ.MarlattG. A. (2002). Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: Is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods?Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 56–63.
NeighborsC.LaBrieJ. W.HummerJ. F.LewisM. A.LeeC. M.DesaiS., . . . LarimerM. E. (2010). Group identification as a moderator of the relationship between perceived social norms and alcohol consumption. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24, 522–528. doi:10.1037/a0019944
32.
NieuwenhuisS.Aston-JonesG.CohenJ. D. (2005). Decision-making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 510–532.
33.
NortonM. I.MoninB.CooperJ.HoggM. A. (2003). Vicarious dissonance: Attitude change from the inconsistency of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 47–62.
34.
PfabiganD. M.SeidelE. M.SladkyR.HahnA.PaulK.GrahlA.. . . WindischbergerC. (2014). P300 amplitude variation is related to ventral striatum BOLD response during gain and loss anticipation: An EEG and fMRI experiment. NeuroImage, 96, 12–21.
35.
PickettC. L.GardnerW. L.KnowlesM. (2004). Getting a cue: The need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1095–1107.
36.
PinterB.GreenwaldA. G. (2011). A comparison of minimal group induction procedures. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 81–98.
37.
RobinsonT. E.BerridgeK. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 18, 247–291.
38.
SelyaA.RoseJ.DierkerL.HedekerD.MermelsteinR. (2012). A practical guide to calculating Cohen’s f 2, a measure of local effect size, from PROC MIXED. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 111. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00111
39.
SemlitschH. V.AndererP.SchusterP.PresslichO. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23, 695–703.
40.
SherK. J. (2015). Moving the alcohol addiction RDoC forward. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 39, 591.
41.
SlutskeW. S. (2005). Alcohol use disorders among US college students and their non-college-attending peers. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 321–327. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.3.321
42.
TroppL. R.WrightS. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585–600.
43.
WhiteA.HingsonR. (2013). The burden of alcohol use: Excessive alcohol consumption and related consequences among college students. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, 35, 201–218.
44.
WhiteH. R.LabouvieE. W. (1989). Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 50, 30–37.
45.
WolfsonM.ChampionH.McCoyT. P.RhodesS. D.IpE. H.BlockerJ. N., . . . DurantR. H. (2012). Impact of a randomized campus/community trial to prevent high-risk drinking among college students. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36, 1767–1778.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
