Humans’ ability to count by verbally labeling discrete quantities is unique in animal cognition. The evolutionary origins of counting algorithms are not understood. We report that nonhuman primates exhibit a cognitive ability that is algorithmically and logically similar to human counting. Monkeys were given the task of choosing between two food caches. First, they saw one cache baited with some number of food items, one item at a time. Then, a second cache was baited with food items, one at a time. At the point when the second set was approximately equal to the first set, the monkeys spontaneously moved to choose the second set even before that cache was completely baited. Using a novel Bayesian analysis, we show that the monkeys used an approximate counting algorithm for comparing quantities in sequence that is incremental, iterative, and condition controlled. This proto-counting algorithm is structurally similar to formal counting in humans and thus may have been an important evolutionary precursor to human counting.
BarnardA. M.HughesK. D.GerhardtR. R.DiVincentiL.BoveeJ. M.CantlonJ. F. (2013). Inherently analog quantity representations in olive baboons (Papio anubis). Frontiers in Comparative Psychology, 4, Article 253. Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00253/full
3.
BeranM. J. (2001). Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 181–191.
4.
BeranM. J. (2007). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) enumerate large and small sequentially presented sets of items using analog numerical representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 42–54.
5.
BeranM. J.McIntyreJ. M.GarlandA.EvansT. A. (2014). What counting for ‘counting’? Chimpanzees respond appropriately to relevant and irrelevant information in a quantity judgment task. Animal Behaviour, 85, 987–993.
6.
BoysenS. T.BernstonG. G. (1989). Numerical competence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 103, 23–31.
7.
BrannonE. (2002). The development of ordinal numerical knowledge in infancy. Cognition, 83, 223–240.
8.
BrannonE. M.TerraceH. S. (1998). Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. Science, 282, 746–749.
9.
CantlonJ.FinkR.SaffordK.BrannonE. M. (2007). Heterogeneity impairs numerical matching but not numerical ordering in preschool children. Developmental Science, 10, 431–440.
10.
CantlonJ. F.BrannonE. M. (2006a). The effect of heterogeneity on numerical ordering in rhesus monkeys. Infancy, 9, 173–189.
11.
CantlonJ. F.BrannonE. M. (2006b). Shared system for ordering small and large numbers in monkeys and humans. Psychological Science, 17, 401–406.
FersterC. B.SkinnerB. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
20.
FlombaumJ.JungeJ.HauserM. (2005). Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) spontaneously compute addition operations over large numbers. Cognition, 97, 315–325.
21.
GallistelC. R. (1989). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
GallistelC. R.GelmanR. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44, 43–74.
23.
GallistelC. R.GelmanR. (2000). Non-verbal numerical cognition: From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 59–65.
24.
GearyD. C. (1995). Reflections of evolution and culture in children’s cognition: Implications for mathematical development and instruction. American Psychologist, 50, 24–37.
25.
GelmanA.CarlinJ. B.SternH. S.DunsonD. B.VehtariA.RubinD. B. (2013). Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
26.
GelmanR. (1990). First principles organize attention to and learning about relevant data: Number and the animate-inanimate distinction as examples. Cognitive Science, 14, 79–106.
27.
GelmanR.BrennemanK. (1994). First principles can support both universal and culture-specific learning about number and music. In HirschfeldL. A.GelmanS. A., Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (p. 369–390). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GelmanR.GallistelC. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
GibbonJ.ChurchR. M.MeckW. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423, 52–77.
30.
HauserM.CareyS.HauserL. (2000). Spontaneous number representation in semi-free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 267, 829–833.
31.
IzardV.PicaP.SpelkeE. S.DehaeneS. (2008). Exact equality and successor function: Two key concepts on the path towards understanding exact numbers. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 491–505.
32.
JordanK. E.MacLeanE.BrannonE. M. (2008). Monkeys match and tally quantities across senses. Cognition, 108, 617–625.
33.
KruschkeJ. K. (2010). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial introduction with R and BUGS. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
34.
LeeM. D.SarneckaB. W. (2011). Number-knower levels in young children: Insights from Bayesian modeling. Cognition, 120, 391–402.
35.
LiptonJ. S.SpelkeE. S. (2003). Origins of number sense: Large-number discrimination in human infants. Psychological Science, 14, 396–401.
36.
McCrinkK.WynnK. (2004). Large-number addition and subtraction by 9-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 15, 776–781.
37.
MechnerF. (1958). Probability relations within response sequences under ratio reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1, 109–121.
38.
MeckW. H.ChurchR. M. (1983). A mode control model of counting and timing processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 320–334.
39.
MixK. S. (2002). The construction of number concepts. Cognitive Development, 17, 1345–1363.
40.
NiederA.MillerE. K. (2003). Coding of cognitive magnitude: Compressed scaling of numerical information in the primate prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 37, 149–157.
41.
PatilA.HuardD.FonnesbeckC. J. (2010). PyMC: Bayesian stochastic modelling in Python. Journal of Statistical Software, 35(4), 1–81.
PicaP.LemerC.IzardV.DehaeneS. (2004). Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 306, 499–503.
44.
SarneckaB. W.LeeM. D. (2009). Levels of number knowledge during early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 325–337.
45.
SpelkeE. (1994). Initial knowledge: Six suggestions. Cognition, 50, 431–445.
46.
StarkeyP.SpelkeE. S.GelmanR. (1990). Numerical abstraction by human infants. Cognition, 36, 97–127.
47.
StevensJ.WoodJ.HauserM. D. (2007). When quantity trumps number: Discrimination experiments in cotton-top tamarins and common marmosets. Animal Cognition, 10, 429–437.
48.
TomonagaM.MatsuzawaT. (2002). Enumeration of briefly presented items by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens). Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 143–157.
49.
WynnK. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358, 749–750.
50.
XuF.SpelkeE. S. (2000). Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition, 74, B1–B11.
51.
ZorziM.PriftisK.UmiltàC. (2002). Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417, 138–139.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
