A prevalent view of visual working memory (VWM) is that visual information is actively maintained in the form of perceptually integrated objects. Such reliance on object-based representations would predict that after an object is fully encoded into VWM, all features of that object would need to be maintained as a coherent unit. Here, we evaluated this idea by testing whether memory resources can be redeployed to a specific feature of an object already stored in VWM. We found that observers can utilize a retrospective cue presented during the maintenance period to attenuate both the gradual deterioration and complete loss of memory for a cued feature over time, but at the cost of accelerated loss of information regarding the uncued feature. Our findings demonstrate that object representations held within VWM can be decomposed into individual features and that having to retain additional features imposes greater demands on active maintenance processes.
AwhE.JonidesJ. (2001). Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 119–126. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01593-X
2.
BarrouilletP.CamosV. (2012). As time goes by: Temporal constraints in working memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 413–419. doi:10.1177/0963721412459513
3.
BaysP. M.WuE. Y.HusainM. (2011). Storage and binding of object features in visual working memory. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1622–1631. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.023
4.
BlaserE.PylyshynZ. W.HolcombeA. O. (2000). Tracking an object through feature space. Nature, 408, 196–199.
5.
BrainardD. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
6.
BurakY.FieteI. R. (2012). Fundamental limits on persistent activity in networks of noisy neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 17645–17650. doi:10.1073/pnas.1117386109
7.
CompteA.BrunelN.Goldman-RakicP. S.WangX.-J. (2000). Synaptic mechanisms and network dynamics underlying spatial working memory in a cortical network model. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 910–923. doi:10.1093/cercor/10.9.910
8.
CowanN.BlumeC. L.SaultsJ. S. (2013). Attention to attributes and objects in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 731–747. doi:10.1037/a0029687
9.
DelvenneJ.-F.BruyerR. (2004). Does visual short-term memory store bound features?Visual Cognition, 11, 1–27. doi:10.1080/13506280344000167
10.
DuncanJ. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501–517.
11.
FougnieD.AlvarezG. A. (2011). Object features fail independently in visual working memory: Evidence for a probabilistic feature-store model. Journal of Vision, 11(12), Article 3. doi:10.1167/11.12.3
12.
FougnieD.AsplundC. L.MaroisR. (2010). What are the units of storage in visual working memory?Journal of Vision, 10(12), Article 27. doi:10.1167/10.12.27
13.
IrwinD. E.AndrewsR. V. (1996). Integration and accumulation of information across saccadic eye movements. In ToshioI.McClellandJ. L. (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 125–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
JeheeJ. F. M.BradyD. K.TongF. (2011). Attention improves encoding of task-relevant features in the human visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 8210–8219. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6153-09.2011
15.
KoP. C.SeiffertA. E. (2009). Updating objects in visual short-term memory is feature selective. Memory & Cognition, 37, 909–923. doi:10.3758/MC.37.6.909
16.
LewandowskyS.OberauerK.BrownG. D. A. (2009). No temporal decay in verbal short-term memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 120–126. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.003
17.
LuckS. J.VogelE. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281. doi:10.1038/36846
18.
LuckS. J.VogelE. K. (2013). Visual working memory capacity: From psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 391–400. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.006
19.
MaW. J.HusainM.BaysP. M. (2014). Changing concepts of working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 17, 347–356. doi:10.1038/nn.3655
20.
MakovskiT.SussmanR.JiangY. V. (2008). Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 369–380. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.369
21.
OberauerK.EichenbergerS. (2013). Visual working memory declines when more features must be remembered for each object. Memory & Cognition, 41, 1212–1227. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0333-6
22.
O’CravenK. M.DowningP. E.KanwisherN. (1999). fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature, 401, 584–587. doi:10.1038/44134
23.
OlsonI. R.JiangY. (2002). Is visual short-term memory object based? Rejection of the “strong-object” hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1055–1067. doi:10.3758/BF03194756
24.
PertzovY.BaysP. M.JosephS.HusainM. (2013). Rapid forgetting prevented by retrospective attention cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1224–1231. doi:10.1037/a0030947
25.
PhillipsW. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 283–290. doi:10.3758/BF03203943
26.
PratteM. S.ParkY. E.RademakerR. L.TongF. (2017). Accounting for stimulus-specific variation in precision reveals a discrete capacity limit in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 6–17. doi:10.1037/xhp0000302
27.
RickerT. J.SpiegelL. R.CowanN. (2014). Time-based loss in visual short-term memory is from trace decay, not temporal distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1510–1523. doi:10.1037/xlm0000018
28.
SerencesJ. T.EsterE. F.VogelE. K.AwhE. (2009). Stimulus-specific delay activity in human primary visual cortex. Psychological Science, 20, 207–214. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02276.x
29.
SligteI. G.ScholteH. S.LammeV. A. F. (2008). Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores?PLoS ONE, 3(2), Article e1699. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001699
30.
SouzaA. S.OberauerK. (2015). Time-based forgetting in visual working memory reflects temporal distinctiveness, not decay. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 156–162. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0652-z
31.
SouzaA. S.OberauerK. (2016). In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 1839–1860. doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1108-5
32.
SouzaA. S.RerkoL.OberauerK. (2016). Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 890–910. doi:10.1037/xhp0000192
33.
TreismanA. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 171–178. doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(96)80070-5
34.
WheelerM. E.TreismanA. M. (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 48–64. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.131.1.48
35.
WilkenP.MaW. J. (2004). A detection theory account of change detection. Journal of Vision, 4(12), Article 11. doi:10.1167/4.12.11
36.
WilliamsM.HongS. W.KangM.-S.CarlisleN. B.WoodmanG. F. (2013). The benefit of forgetting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 348–355. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0354-3
37.
WoodmanG. F.VogelE. K. (2008). Selective storage and maintenance of an object’s features in visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 223–229.
38.
XuY. (2002). Encoding color and shape from different parts of an object in visual short-term memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1260–1280. doi:10.3758/BF03194770
39.
ZhangW.LuckS. J. (2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453, 233–235. doi:10.1038/nature06860
40.
ZhangW.LuckS. J. (2009). Sudden death and gradual decay in visual working memory. Psychological Science, 20, 423–428. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02322.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
