Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Adaptation by natural selection is a core mechanism of evolution. It is also one of the most widely misunderstood scientific processes. Misconceptions are rooted in cognitive biases found in preschoolers, yet concerns about complexity mean that adaptation by natural selection is generally not comprehensively taught until adolescence. This is long after untutored theoretical misunderstandings are likely to have become entrenched. In a novel approach, we explored 5- to 8-year-olds’ capacities to learn a basic but theoretically coherent mechanistic explanation of adaptation through a custom storybook intervention. Experiment 1 showed that children understood the population-based logic of natural selection and also generalized it. Furthermore, learning endured 3 months later. Experiment 2 replicated these results and showed that children understood and applied an even more nuanced mechanistic causal explanation. The findings demonstrate that, contrary to conventional educational wisdom, basic natural selection is teachable in early childhood. Theory-driven interventions using picture storybooks with rich explanatory structure are beneficial.

Keywords

evolution natural selection learning children childhood development science education cognition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achieve, Inc. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards/

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2009). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Bishop

B. A.

Anderson

C. W.

(1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415–427.

Bjorklund

(2005). Children’s thinking: Cognitive development and individual differences. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth.

Brown

A. L.

Kane

M. J.

Long

(1989). Analogical transfer in young children: Analogies as tools for communication and exposition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 275–293.

Browning

Hohenstein

(2013). The use of narrative to promote primary school children’s understanding of evolution. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary Elementary and Early Years Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/03004279.2013.837943

Brumby

M. N.

(1984). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Science Education, 68, 493–503.

Carey

(1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Coley

J. D.

Tanner

K. D.

(2012). Common origins of diverse misconceptions: Cognitive principles and the development of biology thinking. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11, 209–215.

10.

Evans

E. M.

(2001). Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 217–266.

11.

Ferrari

Chi

M. T. H.

(1998). The nature of naive explanations of natural selection. International Journal of Scientific Education, 20, 1231–1256.

12.

Friedman

W. J.

(1977). The development of children’s understanding of cyclic aspects of time. Child Development, 48, 1593–1599.

13.

Ganea

P. A.

DeLoache

J. S.

(2011). Young children’s learning and transfer of biological information from picture books to real animals. Child Development, 82, 1421–1433.

14.

Gelman

S. A.

(2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

15.

Gelman

S. A.

Wellman

H. M.

(1991). Insides and essences: Early understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition, 38, 213–244.

16.

Gentner

(1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In Vosniadou

Ortony

(Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199–241). London, England: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Gopnik

Meltzoff

A. N.

(1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

18.

Gregory

T. R.

(2009). Understanding natural selection: Essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 2, 156–175.

19.

Gripshover

S. J.

Markman

E. M.

(2013). Teaching young children a theory of nutrition: Conceptual change and the potential for increased vegetable consumption. Psychological Science, 24, 1541–1553.

20.

Inagaki

Hatano

(2002). Young children’s naive thinking about the biological world. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

21.

Jaakkola

R. O.

Slaughter

(2002). Children’s body knowledge: Understanding “life” as a biological goal. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 325–342.

22.

Jensen

M. S.

Finley

F. N.

(1995). Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Scientific Education, 79, 147–166.

23.

Keil

F. C.

(1995). The growth of causal understandings of natural kinds. In Sperber

Premack

A. J.

(Eds.), Causal cognition: A multi-disciplinary debate (pp. 234–262). Oxford, England: Clarendon.

24.

Kelemen

(1999). Why are rocks pointy? Children’s preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1440–1453.

25.

Kelemen

(2004). Are children “intuitive theists”? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15, 295–301.

26.

Kelemen

DiYanni

(2005). Intuitions about origins: Purpose and intelligent design in children’s reasoning about nature. Journal of Cognitive Development, 6, 3–31.

27.

Legare

C. H.

Lane

Evans

E. M.

(2013). Anthropomorphizing science: How does it affect the development of evolutionary concepts? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 59, 168–197.

28.

Mayer

Moreno

(2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multi-media learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 43–52.

29.

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

30.

Nehm

R. H.

Kim

S. Y.

Sheppard

(2009). Academic preparation in biology and advocacy for teaching evolution: Biology versus non-biology teachers. Scientific Education, 93, 1122–1146.

31.

Nehm

R. H.

Reilly

(2007). Biology majors’ knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. Bioscience, 57, 263–272.

32.

Nehm

R. H.

Schonfeld

(2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge about evolution and the nature of science lead to greater advocacy for teaching evolution in schools? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 699–723.

33.

Rosengren

K. S.

Brem

S. K.

Evans

E. M.

Sinatra

G. M.

(Eds.). (2012). Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

34.

Rosset

Rottman

(2014). The big “whoops!” in the study of intentional behavior: An appeal for a new framework in understanding human actions. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 14, 27–39.

35.

Scott

(2012). Foreword. In Rosengren

K. S.

Brem

S. K.

Evans

E. M.

Sinatra

G. M.

(Eds.), Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. ix–xiii). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

36.

Shtulman

Schulz

(2008). The relation between essentialist beliefs and evolutionary reasoning. Cognitive Science, 32, 1049–1062.

37.

Solomon

G. E. A.

Johnson

S. C.

Zaitchik

Carey

(1996). Like father, like son: Young children’s understanding of how and why offspring resemble their parents. Child Development, 67, 151–171.

38.

Springer

Keil

F. C.

(1989). On the development of biologically specific beliefs: The case of inheritance. Child Development, 60, 637–648.

39.

Vlaardingerbroek

Roederer

C. J.

(1997). Evolution education in Papua New Guinea: Trainee teachers’ views. Educational Studies, 23, 363–375.

40.

Wellman

H. M.

Gelman

S. A.

(1992). Cognitive development: Foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 337–375.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.55 MB

Young Children Can Be Taught Basic Natural Selection Using a Picture-Storybook Intervention

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material