An increasingly popular theory holds that the mind should be viewed as a near-optimal or rational engine of probabilistic inference, in domains as diverse as word learning, pragmatics, naive physics, and predictions of the future. We argue that this view, often identified with Bayesian models of inference, is markedly less promising than widely believed, and is undermined by post hoc practices that merit wholesale reevaluation. We also show that the common equation between probabilistic and rational or optimal is not justified.
AndersonJ. R.SchoolerL. J. (1991). Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological Science, 2, 396–408.
3.
BattagliaP.HamrickJ.TenenbaumJ. B. (in press). Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA.
4.
BoseovskiJ. J.LeeK. (2006). Children’s use of frequency information for trait categorization and behavioral prediction. Developmental Psychology, 42, 500–513. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.500
5.
BowersJ. S.DavisC. J. (2012). Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 389–414.
6.
CaramazzaA.McCloskeyM.GreenB. (1981). Naive beliefs in “sophisticated” subjects: Misconceptions about trajectories of objects. Cognition, 9, 117–123.
7.
EberhardtF.DanksD. (2011). Confirmation in the cognitive sciences: The problematic case of Bayesian models. Minds and Machines, 21, 389–410.
8.
EvansJ. S. B. T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
FrankM. C.GoodmanN. D. (2012). Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games. Science, 336, 998. doi:10.1126/science.1218633
10.
GigerenzerG.HoffrageU. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684–704.
11.
GopnikA. (2012). Scientific thinking in young children: Theoretical advances, empirical research, and policy implications. Science, 337, 1623–1627. doi:10.1126/science.1223416
12.
GriffithsT. L.TenenbaumJ. B. (2006). Optimal predictions in everyday cognition. Psychological Science, 17, 767–773. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01780.x
13.
GriffithsT. L.VulE.SanbornA. N. (2012). Bridging levels of analysis for probabilistic models of cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 263–268.
14.
GutheilG.GelmanS. A. (1997). Children’s use of sample size and diversity information within basic-level categories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 159–174. doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.2344
15.
GweonH.TenenbaumJ. B.SchulzI. E. (2011). Infants consider both the sample and the sampling process in inductive generalization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 9066–9071.
16.
JacobF. (1977). Evolution and tinkering. Science, 196, 1161–1166.
17.
JacobsR. A.KruschkeJ. K. (2011). Bayesian learning theory applied to human cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2, 8–21. doi:10.1002/wcs.80
18.
JonesM.LoveB. C. (2011). Bayesian fundamentalism or enlightenment? On the explanatory status and theoretical contributions of Bayesian models of cognition [Target article and commentaries]. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 34, 169–231.
19.
KahnemanD. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93, 1449–1475.
20.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237–251.
McNamaraJ. M.GreenR. F.OlssonO. (2006). Bayes’ theorem and its applications in animal behaviour. Oikos, 112, 243–251.
28.
OaksfordM.ChaterN. (2009). Précis of Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning [Target article and commentaries]. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 32, 69–120. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09000284
29.
RamarajanD.VohnoutkaR.KalishC.RhodesM. (2012). Does preschoolers’ evidence selection support word learning?Manuscript in preparation.
30.
RosenthalR. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.
31.
RossL. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173–220). New York, NY: Academic Press.
32.
SieglerR. S. (1976). Three aspects of cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 481–520.
33.
TéglásE.VulE.GirottoV.GonzalezM.TenenbaumJ. B.BonattiL. L. (2011). Pure reasoning in 12-month-old infants as probabilistic inference. Science, 332, 1054–1059. doi:10.1126/science.1196404
34.
TenenbaumJ. B.GriffithsT. L. (2001a). Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference [Target article and commentaries]. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 629–791.
35.
TenenbaumJ. B.GriffithsT. L. (2001b). The rational basis of representativeness. In MooreJ. D.StenningK. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1036–1041). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36.
TenenbaumJ. B.KempC.GriffithsT. L.GoodmanN. D. (2011). How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction. Science, 331, 1279–1285. doi:10.1126/science.1192788
37.
TimmersH.WagenaarW. A. (1977). Inverse statistics and misperception of exponential growth. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 21, 558–562.
38.
TrommershäuserJ.LandyM. S.MaloneyL. T. (2006). Humans rapidly estimate expected gain in movement planning. Psychological Science, 17, 981–988.
39.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
40.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293–315.
41.
WestR. F.StanovichK. E. (2003). Is probability matching smart? Associations between probabilistic choices and cognitive ability. Memory & Cognition, 31, 243–251.
42.
WickensD. D.BornD. G.AllenC. K. (1963). Proactive inhibition and item similarity in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 440–445.
XuF.GarciaV. (2008). Intuitive statistics by 8-month-old infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 5012–5015. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704450105
45.
XuF.KushnirT. (2013). Infants are rational constructivist learners. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 28–32.
46.
XuF.TenenbaumJ. B. (2007). Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review, 114, 245–272. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.245
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
