Drawing is ancient; it is the only childhood cognitive behavior for which there is any direct evidence from the Upper Paleolithic. Do genes influence individual differences in this species-typical behavior, and is drawing related to intelligence (g) in modern children? We report on the first genetically informative study of children’s figure drawing. In a study of 7,752 pairs of twins, we found that genetic differences exert a greater influence on children’s figure drawing at age 4 than do between-family environmental differences. Figure drawing was as heritable as g at age 4 (heritability of .29 for both). Drawing scores at age 4 correlated significantly with g at age 4 (r = .33, p < .001, n = 14,050) and with g at age 14 (r = .20, p < .001, n = 4,622). The genetic correlation between drawing at age 4 and g at age 14 was .52, 95% confidence interval = [.31, .75]. Individual differences in this widespread behavior have an important genetic component and a significant genetic link with g.
AbellS. C.WoodW.LiebmanS. J. (2001). Children’s human figure drawings as measures of intelligence: The comparative validity of three scoring systems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 19, 204–215. doi:10.1177/073428290101900301
2.
BatailleG. (1955). Lascaux, or, the birth of art: Prehistoric painting. Lausanne, Switzerland: Skira.
3.
BokerS.NealeM.MaesH.WildeM.SpiegelM.BrickT. . . . FoxJ. (2011). OpenMx: An open source extended structural equation modeling framework. Psychometrika, 76, 306–317.
BrillM. (1935). The reliability of the Goodenough Draw a Man test and the validity and reliability of an abbreviated scoring method. Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 701–708. doi:10.1037/h0061467
6.
ChalminE.MenuM.PomièsM.-P.VignaudC.AujoulatN.GenesteJ.-M. (2004). Les blasons de Lascaux [The “blazons” of the Lascaux Cave]. L’Anthropologie, 108, 571–592. doi:10.1016/j.anthro.2004.12.001
7.
ChambersD. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-A-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67, 255–265. doi:10.1002/sce.3730670213
8.
ChapmanL. J.ChapmanJ. P. (1967). Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 72, 193–204. doi:10.1037/h0024670
9.
ChappellP. A.SteitzJ. A. (1993). Young children’s human figure drawings and cognitive development. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 76, 611–617. doi:10.2466/pms.1993.76.2.611
10.
ChauvetJ.-M.BrunelD. E.HillaireC. (1995). La grotte Chauvet à Vallon-Pont-d’Arc [The Chauvet cave at Vallon-Pont-d’Arc]. Paris, France: Seuil.
11.
CookJ. (2013). Ice Age art: Arrival of the modern mind. London, England: British Museum Press.
12.
CoxM. V. (1993). Children’s drawings of the human figure. Hove, England: Psychology Press.
13.
FensonL.PethickS.CoxJ. L. (1994). The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: Short form versions. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
14.
GoodenoughF. (1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawings. New York, NY: World Book.
15.
HanscombeK. B.TrzaskowskiM.HaworthC. M. A.DavisO. S. P.DaleP. S.PlominR. (2012). Socioeconomic status (SES) and children’s intelligence (IQ): In a UK-representative sample SES moderates the environmental, not genetic, effect on IQ. PLoS ONE, 7(2), Article e30320. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030320
16.
HaworthC. M. A.DavisO. S. P.PlominR. (2013). Twins Early Development Study (TEDS): A genetically sensitive investigation of cognitive and behavioral development from childhood to young adulthood. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 117–125. doi:10.1017/thg.2012.91
17.
JonesA. W.RichT. A. (1957). The Goodenough Draw-A-Man Test as a measure of intelligence in aged adults. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 235–238. doi:10.1037/h0043094
18.
KaplanE.FeinD.KramerJ.DelisD. C.MorrisR. (1999). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Process Instrument. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
19.
KrohnE. J.TraxlerA. J. (1979). Relationship of the McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities to other measures of preschool cognitive, motor and perceptual development. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 49, 783–790.
20.
LehmannE. L. (1975). Nonparametrics: Statistical methods based on ranks. San Francisco, CA: Holden Day.
21.
LilienfeldS. O.WoodJ. M.GarbH. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 27–66. doi:10.1111/1529-1006.002
22.
McCarthyD. (1972). McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities. New York, NY: Psychological Corp.
23.
MedlandS. E.HatemiP. K. (2009). Political science, biometric theory and twin studies: A methodological introduction. Political Analysis, 17, 191–214.
24.
NaglieriJ.MaxwellS. (1981). Inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the Goodenough-Harris and McCarthy Draw-A-Child scoring systems. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 53, 343–348. doi:10.2466/pms.1981.53.2.343
25.
OaklandT.DowlingL. (1983). The Draw-A-Person Test: Validity properties for nonbiased assessment. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 526–534. doi:10.2307/1510541
26.
OliverB. R.PlominR. (2007). Twins’ Early Development Study (TEDS): A multivariate, longitudinal genetic investigation of language, cognition and behavior problems from childhood through adolescence. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 10, 96–105. doi:10.1375/twin.10.1.96
27.
PikeA. W.HoffmanD. L.Garcia-DiezM.PettittP. B.AlcoleaJ.De BalbinR. . . . ZilhaoJ. (2012). U-series dating of Paleolithic art in 11 caves in Spain. Science, 336, 1409–1413. doi:10.1126/science.1219957
28.
PlominR.DeFriesJ. C.KnopikV. S.NeiderhiserJ. M. (2013). Behavioral genetics. New York, NY: Worth.
29.
PlubrukarnR.TheeramanoparpS. (2003). Human figure drawing test: Validity in assessing intelligence in children aged 3-10 years. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 86(Suppl. 3), 610–617.
30.
PriceT. S.EleyT. C.DaleP. S.StevensonJ.SaudinoK. (2000). Genetic and environmental covariation between verbal and nonverbal cognitive development in infancy. Child Development, 71, 948–959.
31.
PriceT. S.FreemanB.CraigI.PetrillS. A.EbersoleL.PlominR. (2000). Infant zygosity can be assigned by parental report questionnaire data. Twin Research, 3, 128–133. doi:10.1375/136905200320565391
32.
RavenJ.CourtJ. H.RavenJ. C. (1996). Standard Progressive Matrices. Oxford, England: Oxford Psychologists Press.
33.
SaidaY.MiyashitaM. (1979). Development of fine motor skill in children: Manipulation of a pencil in young children aged 2-6 years old. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 5(2), 104–113.
34.
ScottL. H. (1981). Measuring intelligence with the Goodenough-Harris Drawing Test. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 483–505. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.89.3.483
35.
SharpeK.Van GelderL. (2006). The study of finger flutings. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 16, 281–295.
36.
ShepherdP. (2012). Measures of ability at ages 7 to 16 [1958 National Child Development Study User Guide]. London, England: Centre for Longitudinal Studies.
37.
SpinathF. M.RonaldA.HarlaarN.PriceT. S.PlominR. (2003). Phenotypic g early in life: On the etiology of general cognitive ability in a large population sample of twin children aged 2–4 years. Intelligence, 31, 195–210. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00110-1
38.
ValladasH.CachierH.MauriceP.BernaldodeQuirostF.ClottesJ.Cabrera ValdesV.ArnoldM. (1992). Direct radiocarbon dates for prehistoric paintings at the Altamira, El Castillo and Niaux caves. Nature, 357, 68–70. doi:10.1038/357068a0
39.
WillcockE.ImutaA. K.HayneH. (2011). Children’s human figure drawings do not measure intellectual ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 444–452. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.04.013
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
