Do Girls Really Experience More Anxiety in Mathematics?

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to examine gender differences in trait (habitual) versus state (momentary) mathematics anxiety in a sample of students (Study 1: N = 584; Study 2: N = 111). For trait math anxiety, the findings of both studies replicated previous research showing that female students report higher levels of anxiety than do male students. However, no gender differences were observed for state anxiety, as assessed using experience-sampling methods while students took a math test (Study 1) and attended math classes (Study 2). The discrepant findings for trait versus state math anxiety were partly accounted for by students’ beliefs about their competence in mathematics, with female students reporting lower perceived competence than male students despite having the same average grades in math. Implications for educational practices and the assessment of anxiety are discussed.

Keywords

emotions sex differences science education academic achievement mathematics achievement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Buehler

McFarland

(2001). Intensity bias in affective forecasting: The role of temporal focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1480–1493. doi:10.1177/01461672012711009

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Csikszentmihalyi

Larson

(1987). Validity and reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 9, 526–536.

Diener

(2000). Subjective well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43.

Eccles

(2012, April). Expectancy-value theory and gendered academic and occupational choices. Paper presented at the 2012 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Else-Quest

N. M.

Hyde

J. S.

Linn

M. C.

(2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 103–127.

Goetz

Frenzel

A. C.

Hall

N. C.

Pekrun

(2008). Antecedents of academic emotions: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic enjoyment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 9–33.

Goetz

Frenzel

C. A.

Pekrun

Hall

N. C.

Lüdtke

(2007). Between- and within-domain relations of students’ academic emotions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 715–733.

Goetz

Preckel

Pekrun

Hall

N. C.

(2007). Emotional experiences during test taking: Does cognitive ability make a difference? Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 3–16.

10.

Hall

N. C.

Perry

R. P.

Goetz

Ruthig

J. C.

Stupnisky

R. H.

Newall

N. E.

(2007). Attributional retraining and elaborative learning: Improving academic development through writing-based interventions. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 280–290.

11.

Halpern

D. F.

Benbow

C. P.

Geary

D. C.

Gur

Hyde

J. S.

Gernsbacher

M. A.

(2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1–51.

12.

Hektner

J. M.

Schmidt

J. A.

Csikszentmihalyi

(2007). Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

Hyde

J. S.

Fennema

Ryan

Frost

L. A.

Hopp

(1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 299–324.

14.

Hyde

J. S.

Lindberg

S. M.

Linn

M. C.

Ellis

Williams

(2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494–495.

15.

Keller

(2002). Blatant stereotype threat and women’s math performance: Self-handicapping as a strategic means to cope with obtrusive negative performance expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 193–198.

16.

Kunter

Schümer

Artelt

Baumert

Klieme

Neubrand

. . . Weiß

(2002). PISA 2000: Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente [PISA 2000: Documentation of Scales]. Berlin, Germany: Heenemann GmbH.

17.

(1999). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 520–540.

18.

Marsh

H. W.

(1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129–149.

19.

Marsh

H. W.

(1990). Self-Description Questionnaire (SDQ) II: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of adolescent self-concept: An interim test manual and a research monograph. Macarthur, New South Wales, Australia: University of Western Sydney.

20.

National Academy of Sciences. (2006). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

21.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework. Paris, France: Author.

22.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris, France: Author.

23.

Pekrun

(2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341.

24.

Pekrun

Goetz

Frenzel

A. C.

Barchfeld

Perry

R. P.

(2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36–48.

25.

Pekrun

Goetz

Titz

Perry

R. P.

(2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91–105.

26.

Pekrun

vom Hofe

Blum

Frenzel

A. C.

Goetz

Wartha

(2007). Development of mathematical competencies in adolescence: The PALMA longitudinal study. In Prenzel

(Ed.), Studies on the educational quality of schools: The final report of the DFG Priority Programme (pp. 17–37). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.

27.

Porter

L. S.

Marco

C. A.

Schwartz

J. E.

Neale

J. M.

Shiffman

Stone

A. A.

(2000). Gender differences in coping: A comparison of trait and momentary assessments. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 19, 480–498.

28.

Preacher

K. J.

Rucker

D. D.

Hayes

A. F.

(2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.

29.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

(2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

30.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

Congdon

(2007). HLM 6.08: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

31.

Robinson

M. D.

Clore

G. L.

(2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 934–960. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934

32.

Skinner

E. A.

(1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 549–570.

33.

Steele

Aronson

(1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.

34.

Valentine

J. C.

DuBois

D. L.

Cooper

(2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111–133.

35.

Wheeler

S. C.

Petty

R. E.

(2001). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 797–826. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.797

36.

Wigfield

Battle

Keller

L. B.

Eccles

J. S.

(2002). Sex differences in motivation, self-concept, career aspiration, and career choice: Implications for cognitive development. In McGillicuddy-De Lisi

De Lisi

(Eds.), Biology, society, and behavior: The development of sex differences in cognition (pp. 93–124). Westport, CT: Ablex.

37.

Wirtz

Kruger

Napa Scollon

Diener

(2003). What to do on spring break? The role of predicted, on-line, and remembered experience in future choice. Psychological Science, 14, 520–524. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.03455

38.

Zeidner

(1998). Test anxiety: The state of the art. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.29 MB