Although the perceived compatibility between one’s gender and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) identities (gender-STEM compatibility) has been linked to women’s success in STEM fields, no work to date has examined how the stability of identity over time contributes to subjective and objective STEM success. In the present study, 146 undergraduate female STEM majors rated their gender-STEM compatibility weekly during their freshman spring semester. STEM women higher in gender rejection sensitivity, or gender RS, a social-cognitive measure assessing the tendency to perceive social-identity threat, experienced larger fluctuations in gender-STEM compatibility across their second semester of college. Fluctuations in compatibility predicted impaired outcomes the following school year, including lower STEM engagement and lower academic performance in STEM (but not non-STEM) classes, and significantly mediated the relationship between gender RS and STEM engagement and achievement in the 2nd year of college. The week-to-week changes in gender-STEM compatibility occurred in response to negative academic (but not social) experiences.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.
2.
AronsonJ.InzlichtM. (2004). The ups and downs of attributional ambiguity: Stereotype vulnerability and the academic self-knowledge of African American college students. Psychological Science, 15, 829–836.
3.
AronsonJ.McGloneM. S. (2009). Stereotype and social identity threat. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 153–178). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
4.
BolgerN.ZuckermanA. (1995). A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 890–902.
5.
CampbellJ. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 538–549. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.3.538
6.
CheryanS.PlautV. C.DaviesP. G.SteeleC. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045–1060. doi:10.1037/a0016239
7.
DaviesP. G.SpencerS. J.QuinnD. M.GerhardsteinR. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615–1628. doi:10.1177/014616702237644
8.
DerksB.Van LaarC.EllemersN. (2007). The beneficial effects of social identity protection on the performance motivation of members of devalued groups. Social Issues and Policy Review, 1, 217–256.
9.
DiekmanA. B.BrownE. R.JohnstonA. M.ClarkE. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21, 1051–1057. doi:10.1177/0956797610377342
10.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.NierJ. A.KawakamiK.HodsonG. (2004). Contemporary racial bias: When good people do bad things. In MillerA. G. (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 141–167). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11.
DovidioJ. F.KawakamiK.JohnsonC.JohnsonB.HowardA. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510–540.
12.
DowneyG.FeldmanS. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327–1343. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327
13.
EaglyA. H.SteffenV. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735–754. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.735
14.
FroneM. R.RussellM.CooperM. L. (1997). Relation of work-family conflict to health outcomes: A four-year longitudinal study of employed parents. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 325–335.
15.
GersickC. J. G.DuttonJ. E.BartunekJ. M. (2000). Learning from academia: The importance of relationships in professional life. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1026–1044.
16.
GoodC.RattanA.DweckC. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 700–717. doi:10.1037/a0026659
17.
InzlichtM.Ben-ZeevT. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365–371.
18.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.BolgerN. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233–265). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
19.
LarsonR. W.AlmeidaD. M. (1999). Emotional transmission in the daily lives of families: A new paradigm for studying family process. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 5–20.
20.
LitzlerE.LangeS. E.BrainardS. G. (2005, June). Climate for graduate students in science and engineering departments. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR.
21.
LondonB.DowneyG.BolgerN.VelillaE. (2005). A framework for studying social identity and coping with daily stress during the transition to college. In DowneyG.EcclesJ.ChatmanC. (Eds.), Navigating the future: Social identity, coping, and life tasks (pp. 45–63). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
22.
LondonB.DowneyG.Romero-CanyasR.RattanA.TysonD. (2012). Gender-based rejection sensitivity and academic self-silencing in women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 961–979. doi:10.1037/a0026615
23.
LondonB.RosenthalL.LevyS.LobelM. (2011). The influences of perceived identity compatibility and social support on women in nontraditional fields during the college transition. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33, 304–321. doi:10.1080/01973533.2011.614166
24.
Mendoza-DentonR.DowneyG.PurdieV. J.DavisA.PietrzakJ. (2002). Sensitivity to status-based rejection: Implications for African American students’ college experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 896–918.
25.
MurrayS. L.MeinholdtC.BergmannL. S. (1999). Addressing gender issues in the engineering classroom. Feminist Teacher, 12, 169–183.
26.
National Science Foundation. (2009). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (NSF No. 09–305). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
27.
NetemeyerR. G.BolesJ. S.McMurrianR. (1996). Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 400–410.
28.
ParkL. E.YoungA. F.TroisiJ. D.PinkusR. T. (2011). Effects of everyday romantic goal pursuit on women’s attitudes toward math and science. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1259–1273. doi:10.1177/0146167211408436
29.
PreacherK.HayesA. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
30.
RosenthalL.LondonB.LevyS. R.LobelM. (2011). The roles of perceived identity compatibility and social support for women in a single-sex STEM program at a co-educational university. Sex Roles, 65, 725–736. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9945-0
31.
RubleD. N.SeidmanE. (1996). Social transitions: Windows into social psychological processes. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 830–856). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
32.
SekaquaptewaD.ThompsonM. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 68–74. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00508-5
33.
SettlesI. H. (2004). When multiple identities interfere: The role of identity centrality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 487–500. doi:10.1177/0146167203261885
34.
SettlesI. H.JellisonW. A.Pratt-HyattJ. S. (2009). Identification with multiple social groups: The moderating role of identity change over time among women-scientists. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 856–867. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.005
35.
TroppL. R.WrightS. C. (2001). Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 585–600.
