Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Wealth inequality has significant psychological, physiological, societal, and economic costs. In six experiments, we investigated how seemingly innocuous, culturally pervasive ideas can help maintain and further wealth inequality. Specifically, we tested whether the concept of choice, which is deeply valued in American society, leads Americans to act in ways that perpetuate wealth inequality. Thinking in terms of choice, we argue, activates the belief that life outcomes stem from personal agency, not societal factors, and thereby leads people to justify wealth inequality. The results showed that highlighting the concept of choice makes people less disturbed by facts about existing wealth inequality in the United States, more likely to underestimate the role of societal factors in individuals’ successes, less likely to support the redistribution of educational resources, and less likely to support raising taxes on the rich—even if doing so would help resolve a budget deficit crisis. These findings indicate that the culturally valued concept of choice contributes to the maintenance of wealth inequality.

Keywords

policymaking decision making choice wealth inequality redistribution taxation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alesina

Rodrik

(1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 890–895.

Bartels

L. M.

(2005). Homer gets a tax cut: Inequality and public policy in the American mind. Perspectives on Politics, 3, 15–31.

Bryan

C. J.

Dweck

C. S.

Ross

Kay

A. C.

Mislavsky

N. O.

(2009). Political mindset: Effects of schema priming on liberal-conservative political positions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 890–895.

Buffett

W. E.

(2011, August 15). Stop coddling the super-rich. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/15/opinion/stop-coddling-the-super-rich.html

Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2011). National economic accounts. Retrieved from http://www.bea.gov/national/index.htm

Central Intelligence Agency. (2009). The world factbook. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html.

Crowne

D. P.

Marlowe

(1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.

Darling-Hammond

(2004). What happens to a dream deferred: The continuing quest for equal educational opportunity. In Banks

Banks

(Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 607–630). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Dienes

(2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 274–290.

10.

Fong

(2001). Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 82, 225–246.

11.

Frank

R. H.

(2007). Falling behind: How rising inequality harms the middle class. Berkeley: University of California Press.

12.

Frank

R. H.

(2011). The Darwin economy: Liberty, competition, and the common good. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

13.

Hanson

J. D.

Hanson

(2006). The blame frame: Justifying (racial) injustice in America. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 41, 413–480.

14.

Inesi

M. E.

Botti

Dubois

Rucker

D. D.

Galinsky

A. D.

(2011). Power and choice: Their dynamic interplay in quenching the thirst for personal control. Psychological Science, 22, 1042–1048.

15.

Iyengar

S. S.

Lepper

(1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349–366.

16.

Jeffreys

(1961). Theory of probability. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

17.

Kluegel

J. R.

Smith

E. R.

(1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. New York, NY: Aldine Transaction.

18.

Korpi

Palme

(1998). The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality and poverty in the Western countries. American Sociological Review, 63, 661–687.

19.

Ledgerwood

Mandisodza

A. N.

Jost

J. T.

Pohl

(2011). Working for the system: Motivated defense of meritocratic beliefs. Social Cognition, 3, 322–340.

20.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

(1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

21.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

(2003). Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action. In Murphy-Burman

Berman

(Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 49. Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self (pp. 1–57). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

22.

Morris

M. W.

Menon

Ames

D. R.

(2001). Culturally conferred conceptions of agency: A key to social perception of persons, groups, and other actors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 169–182.

23.

Morris

M. W.

Peng

(1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949–971.

24.

Napier

J. L.

Jost

J. T.

(2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Psychological Science, 19, 565–572.

25.

Norton

M. I.

Ariely

(2011). Building a better America—one wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 9–12.

26.

Oishi

Kesebir

Diener

(2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22, 1095–1100.

27.

Oishi

Schimmack

Diener

(2012). Progressive taxation and the subjective well-being of nations. Psychological Science, 23, 86–92.

28.

Oppenheimer

D. M.

Meyvis

Davidenko

(2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872.

29.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). OECD tax database. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/document/60/0,3746,en_2649_34533_1942460_1_1_1_1,00.html

30.

Porter

C. M.

(in press). ‘Choice’: What we mean by it, and what that means for preventing childhood obesity. Public Health Nutrition. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S136898001200059610.1017/S1368980012000596.

31.

Rattan

Savani

Naidu

N. V. R.

Dweck

C. S.

(2012). Can everyone become intelligent? Cultural differences and societal consequences of the belief in a universal potential for intelligence. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

32.

Savani

Markus

H. R.

Naidu

N. V. R.

Kumar

Berlia

(2010). What counts as a choice? U.S. Americans are more likely than Indians to construe actions as choices. Psychological Science, 20, 1–8.

33.

Savani

Stephens

N. M.

Markus

H. R.

(2011). The unanticipated interpersonal consequences of choice: Victim blaming and reduced support for the public good. Psychological Science, 22, 795–802.

34.

Schwartz

(2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York, NY: Ecco.

35.

Stephens

N. M.

Levine

C. S.

(2011). Opting out or denying discrimination? How the framework of free choice in American society influences perceptions of gender inequality. Psychological Science, 22, 1231–1236.

36.

Tavakoli

(2012). Do Iranian and Canadian females make different personal decisions? Sociology Mind, 2, 127–132.

37.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2010. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/p60-239.pdf

38.

Wakslak

C. J.

Jost

J. T.

Tyler

T. R.

Chen

(2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267–274.

39.

Wilkinson

Pickett

(2009). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.

40.

Wolff

E. N.

(2010). Recent trends in household wealth in the United States: Rising debt and the middle-class squeeze—an update to 2007. The Levy Economics Institute Working Paper Collection, 589, 1–59.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

A Choice Mind-Set Increases the Acceptance and Maintenance of Wealth Inequality

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material