Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Processes of proactive interference were explored using the pigeon as a model system of memory. This study shows that proactive interference extends back in time at least 16 trials (and as many minutes), revealing a continuum of interference and providing a framework for studying memory. Pigeons were tested in a delayed same/different task containing trial-unique pictures. On interference trials, sample pictures from previous trials reappeared as test pictures on different trials. Proactive-interference functions showed greatest interference from the most recent trial and with the longer of two delays (10 s vs. 1 s). These interference functions are accounted for by a time-estimation model based on signal detection theory. The model predicts that accuracy at test is determined solely by the ratio of the elapsed time since the offset of the current-trial sample to the elapsed time since the offset of the interfering sample. Implications for comparing memory of different species and different types of memory (e.g., familiarity vs. recollection) are discussed.

Keywords

comparative psychology memory time perception cognitive processes signal detection theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvarez

G. A.

Cavanagh

(2004). The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106–111.

Atkinson

R. C.

Shiffrin

R. M.

(1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Spence

K. W.

Spence

J. T.

(Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89–105). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Baddeley

A. D.

(1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556–559.

Bjork

R. A.

(2001). Recency and recovery in human memory. In Roediger

H. L.

III Nairne

J. S.

Neath

Surprenant

A. M.

(Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 211–232). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Brady

T. F.

Konkle

Alvarez

G. A.

(2011). A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations. Journal of Vision, 11(5), Article 4. Retrieved from http://journalofvision.org/11/5/4

Brown

(1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 12–21.

Buhusi

C. V.

Meck

W. H.

(2005). What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 755–765.

Cowan

(2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity [Target article and commentaries]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.

Cowan

(2005). Working memory capacity. Hove, England: Psychology Press.

10.

Cowan

Johnson

T. D.

Saults

J. S.

(2005). Capacity limits in list item recognition: Evidence from proactive interference. Memory, 13, 293–299.

11.

Devine

J. V.

Jones

L. C.

(1975). Matching to successive samples: A multiple-unit memory task with rhesus monkeys. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 7, 438–440.

12.

Eng

H. Y.

Chen

Jiang

(2005). Visual working memory for simple and complex visual stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1127–1133.

13.

Gibbon

(1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84, 279–325.

14.

Glenberg

A. M.

Bradley

M. M.

Kraus

T. A.

Renzaglia

G. J.

(1983). Studies of the long-term recency effect: Support for a contextually guided retrieval hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 231–255.

15.

Hartshorne

J. K.

(2008). Visual working memory capacity and proactive interference. PLoS One, 3(7), e2716. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0002716

16.

Hintzman

D. L.

(2011). Research strategy in the study of memory: Fads, fallacies, and the search for the “coordinates of truth.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 253–271.

17.

Howard

M. W.

Kahana

M. J.

(2002). A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 269–299.

18.

Katz

J. S.

Wright

A. A.

(2006). Same/different abstract-concept learning by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 80–86. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.32.1.8010.1037/0097-7403.32.1.80

19.

Keppel

Underwood

B. J.

(1962). Proactive inhibition in short-term retention of single items. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1, 153–161.

20.

Makovski

Jiang

Y. V.

(2008). Proactive interference from items previously stored in visual working memory. Memory & Cognition, 36, 43–52.

21.

Murdock

B. B.

(1960). The distinctiveness of stimuli. Psychological Review, 67, 16–31.

22.

Nairne

J. S.

(2002). Remembering over the short-term: The case against the standard model. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 53–81.

23.

Nairne

J. S.

Neath

Serra

Byun

(1997). Positional distinctiveness and the ratio rule in free recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 155–166.

24.

Neath

(1993). Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition. Memory & Cognition, 21, 689–698.

25.

Overman

W. H.

Doty

R. W.

(1980). Prolonged visual memory in macaques and man. Neuroscience, 5, 1825–1831.

26.

Peterson

L. R.

Peterson

M. J.

(1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193–198.

27.

Rensink

R. A.

(2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 245–277.

28.

Roberts

W. A.

Grant

D. S.

(1976). Studies of short-term memory in the pigeon using the delayed matching-to-sample procedure. In Medin

D. L.

Roberts

W. A.

Davis

R. T.

(Eds.), Processes of animal memory (pp. 79–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

29.

Sands

S. F.

Wright

A. A.

(1980). Primate memory: Retention of serial list items by a rhesus monkey. Science, 209, 938–940.

30.

Wright

A. A.

(2007). An experimental analysis of memory processing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88, 405–433.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB

How to Be Proactive About Interference

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material