Although the role of IQ in developmental dyslexia remains ambiguous, the dominant clinical and research approaches rely on a definition of dyslexia that requires reading skill to be significantly below the level expected given an individual’s IQ. In the study reported here, we used functional MRI (fMRI) to examine whether differences in brain activation during phonological processing that are characteristic of dyslexia were similar or dissimilar in children with poor reading ability who had high IQ scores (discrepant readers) and in children with poor reading ability who had low IQ scores (nondiscrepant readers). In two independent samples including a total of 131 children, using univariate and multivariate pattern analyses, we found that discrepant and nondiscrepant poor readers exhibited similar patterns of reduced activation in brain areas such as left parietotemporal and occipitotemporal regions. These results converge with behavioral evidence indicating that, regardless of IQ, poor readers have similar kinds of reading difficulties in relation to phonological processing.
BrownL. J.FernerH. S.RobertsonJ.MillsN. L.PessottoR.DearyI. J.MacLullichA. M. (2011). Differential effects of delirium on fluid and crystallized cognitive abilities. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 52, 153–158. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2010.03.00510.1016/j.archger.2010.03.005
2.
BrunswickN.McCroryE.PriceC. J.FrithC. D.FrithU. (1999). Explicit and implicit processing of words and pseudowords by adult developmental dyslexics. Brain, 122, 1901–1917.
De MartinoF.ValenteG.StaerenN.AshburnerJ.GoebelR.FormisanoE. (2008). Combining multivariate voxel selection and support vector machines for mapping and classification of fMRI spatial patterns. NeuroImage, 43, 44–58.
5.
DunnL. M.DunnD. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
6.
FerrerE.ShaywitzB. A.HolahanJ. M.MarchioneK.ShaywitzS. E. (2010). Uncoupling of reading and IQ over time: Empirical evidence for a definition of dyslexia. Psychological Science, 21, 93–101. doi:10.1177/095679760935408410.1177/0956797609354084
7.
FletcherJ. M.LyonG. R.FuchsL. S.BarnesM. (2006). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
8.
FletcherJ. M.ShaywitzS. E.ShankweilerD. P.KatzL.LibermanI. Y.StuebingK. K.. . . ShaywitzB. A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6–23.
9.
FristonK. J.HolmesA. P.PriceC. J.BuchelC.WorsleyK. J. (1999). Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses. NeuroImage, 10, 385–396.
10.
GothelfD.HoeftF.UenoT.SugiuraL.LeeA. D.ThompsonP.ReissA. L. (2011). Developmental changes in multivariate neuroanatomical patterns that predict risk for psychosis in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45, 322–331. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.07.00810.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.07.008
11.
HoeftF.HernandezA.McMillonG.Taylor-HillH.MartindaleJ. L.MeylerA.. . .GabrieliJ. (2006). Neural basis of dyslexia: A comparison between dyslexic and nondyslexic children equated for reading ability. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 10700–10708.
12.
HoeftF.LightbodyA. A.HazlettH. C.PatnaikS.PivenJ.ReissA. L. (2008). Morphometric spatial patterns differentiating boys with fragile X syndrome, typically developing boys, and developmentally delayed boys aged 1 to 3 years. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65, 1087–1097.
13.
HoeftF.McCandlissB. D.BlackJ. M.GantmanA.ZakeraniN.HulmeC.. . . GabrieliJ. D. E. (2011). Neural systems predicting long-term outcome in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 361–366.
14.
HoeftF.MeylerA.HernandezA.JuelC.Taylor-HillH.MartindaleJ. L.. . . GabrieliJ. D. E. (2007). Functional and morphometric brain dissociation between dyslexia and reading ability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 4234–4239.
15.
HoeftF.WalterE.LightbodyA. A.HazlettH. C.ChangC.PivenJ.ReissA. L. (2011). Neuroanatomical differences in toddler boys with fragile X syndrome and idiopathic autism. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68, 295–305.
16.
HulmeC.SnowlingM. J. (2009). Developmental disorders of language learning and cognition. West Sussex, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
17.
HurfordD. P.SchaufJ. D.BunceL.BlaichT.MooreK. (1994). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 371–382.
18.
KronbichlerM.HutzlerF.StaffenW.MairA.LadurnerG.WimmerH. (2006). Evidence for a dysfunction of left posterior reading areas in German dyslexic readers. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1822–1832.
19.
MachekG. R.NelsonJ. M. (2007). How should reading disabilities be operationalized? A survey of practicing school psychologists. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 147–157.
20.
MaisogJ. M.EinbinderE. R.FlowersD. L.TurkeltaubP. E.EdenG. F. (2008). A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of dyslexia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1145, 237–259.
21.
MaldjianJ. A.LaurientiP. J.KraftR. A.BurdetteJ. H. (2003). An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets. NeuroImage, 19, 1233–1239.
22.
MarzelliM. J.HoeftF.HongD. S.ReissA. L. (2011). Neuroanatomical spatial patterns in Turner syndrome. NeuroImage, 55, 439–447.
23.
NicholsT.BrettM.AnderssonJ.WagerT.PolineJ. B. (2005). Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. NeuroImage, 25, 653–660.
24.
O’MalleyK. J.FrancisD. J.FoormanB. R.FletcherJ. M.SwankP. R. (2002). Growth in precursor and reading-related skills: Do low-achieving and IQ-discrepant readers develop differently?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 19–34.
25.
PaulesuE.DemonetJ. F.FazioF.McCroryE.ChanoineV.BrunswickN.. . . FrithU. (2001). Dyslexia: Cultural diversity and biological unity. Science, 291, 2165–2167.
26.
RichlanF.KronbichlerM.WimmerH. (2009). Functional abnormalities in the dyslexic brain: A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 3299–3308.
27.
RumseyJ. M.NaceK.DonohueB.WiseD.MaisogJ. M.AndreasonP. (1997). A positron emission tomographic study of impaired word recognition and phonological processing in dyslexic men. Archives of Neurology, 54, 562–573.
28.
ShaywitzS. E.EscobarM. D.ShaywitzB. A.FletcherJ. M.MakughR. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. New England Journal of Medicine, 326, 145–150.
29.
ShaywitzS. E.ShaywitzB. A.PughK. R.FulbrightR. K.ConstableR. T.MenclW. E.. . . GoreJ. C. (1998). Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 2636–2641.
30.
StanovichK. E. (2005). The future of a mistake: Will discrepancy measurement continue to make the learning disabilities field a pseudoscience?Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 103–106.
31.
StanovichK. E.SiegelL. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53.
StuebingK. K.FletcherJ. M.LeDouxJ. M.LyonG. R.ShaywitzS. E.ShaywitzB. A. (2002). Validity of IQ-discrepancy classifications of reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 469–518.
34.
TempleE.PoldrackR. A.SalidisJ.DeutschG. K.TallalP.MerzenichM. M.GabrieliJ. D. (2001). Disrupted neural responses to phonological and orthographic processing in dyslexic children: An fMRI study. NeuroReport, 12, 299–307.
35.
TorgesenJ.MyersD.SchirmA.StuartE.VartivarianS.MansfieldW.. . . HaanC. (2006). National Assessment of Title I: Interim Report to Congress: Vol. II. Closing the reading gap: First year findings from a randomized trial of four reading interventions for striving readers. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/disadv/title1interimreport/index.html
36.
TunmerW.GreaneyK. (2010). Defining dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 229–243.
37.
Tzourio-MazoyerN.LandeauB.PapathanassiouD.CrivelloF.EtardO.DelcroixN.. . . JoliotM. (2002). Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. NeuroImage, 15, 273–289.
38.
VellutinoF. R.ScanlonD. M.SmallS.FanueleD. P. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 157–169.
39.
WoodcockR. W. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests–Revised/normative update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
40.
ZenoS. M.IvensS. H.MillardR. T.DuvvuriR. (1995). The educator’s word frequency guide. New York, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
