Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Human conscious awareness is commonly seen as the climax of evolution. However, what function—if any—it serves in human behavior is still debated. One of the leading suggestions is that the cardinal function of conscious awareness is to integrate numerous inputs—including the multitude of features and objects in a complex scene—across different levels of analysis into a unified, coherent, and meaningful perceptual experience. Here we demonstrate, however, that integration of objects with their background scenes can be achieved without awareness of either. We used a binocular rivalry technique known as continuous flash suppression to induce perceptual suppression in a group of human observers. Complex scenes that included incongruent objects escaped perceptual suppression faster than normal scenes did. We conclude that visual awareness is not needed for object-background integration or for processing the likelihood of an object to appear within a given semantic context, but may be needed for dealing with novel situations.

Keywords

awareness object-background relations incongruency continuous flash suppression binocular rivalry integration scene perception

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Almeida

Mahon

B. Z.

Nakayama

Caramazza

(2008). Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 15214–15218.

Baars

B. J.

(1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Baars

B. J.

(2005). Global workspace theory of consciousness: Toward a cognitive neuroscience of human experience. Progress in Brain Research, 150, 45–53.

Bar

(2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 617–629.

Bar

(2007). The proactive brain: Using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 280–289.

Biederman

Mezzanotte

R. J.

Rabinowitz

J. C.

(1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 143–177.

Bodner

G. E.

Dypvik

A. T.

(2005). Masked priming of number judgments depends on prime validity and task. Memory & Cognition, 33, 29–47.

Brainard

(1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.

Cheesman

Merikle

(1984). Priming with and without awareness. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 387–395.

10.

Chun

M. M.

Jiang

(1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28–71.

11.

Crick

Koch

(2003). A framework for consciousness. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 119–126.

12.

Davenport

J. L.

Potter

M. C.

(2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15, 559–564.

13.

de Gelder

Pourtois

Weiskrantz

(2002). Fear recognition in the voice is modulated by unconsciously recognized facial expressions but not by unconsciously recognized affective pictures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 4121–4126.

14.

Dehaene

Naccache

(2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79, 1–37.

15.

Dehaene

Naccache

Cohen

Le Bihan

Mangin

J.-F.

Poline

J.-B.

Rivière

(2001). Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 752–758.

16.

Engel

A. K.

Fries

Konig

Brecht

Singer

(1999). Temporal binding, binocular rivalry, and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 128–151.

17.

Fang

(2005). Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1380–1385.

18.

Goodale

M. A.

(2004). Perceiving the world and grasping it: Dissociations between conscious and unconscious visual processing. In Gazzaniga

M. S.

(Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences III (3rd ed., pp. 1159–1172). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

19.

Goodale

M. A.

Milner

A. D.

(1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20–25.

20.

Hassin

R. R.

Bargh

J. A.

Zimerman

(2009). Automatic and flexible: The case of nonconscious goal pursuit. Social Cognition, 27, 20–36.

21.

Huxley

T. H.

(1898). On the hypothesis that animals are automata, and its history. In Huxley

T.H.

(Ed.), Method and results: Essays by Thomas H. Huxley (pp. 199–250). New York, NY: D. Appleton and Co. (Reprinted from The Fortnightly Review, 16, 555–580, 1874)

22.

Jiang

Costello

Fang

Huang

(2006). A gender- and sexual orientation-dependent spatial attentional effect of invisible images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 17048–17052.

23.

Jiang

Costello

(2007). Processing of invisible stimuli: Advantage of upright faces and recognizable words in overcoming interocular suppression. Psychological Science, 18, 349–355.

24.

Koch

Crick

(2001). The zombie within. Nature, 411, 893.

25.

Kouider

Dehaene

(2007). Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: A critical review of visual masking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362, 857–875.

26.

Kouider

Dupoux

(2004). Partial awareness creates the “illusion” of subliminal semantic priming. Psychological Science, 15, 75–81.

27.

Lamy

Mudrik

Deouell

L. Y.

(2008). Unconscious auditory information can prime visual word processing: A process-dissociation procedure study. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 688–698.

28.

Lau

H. C.

Passingham

R. E.

(2007). Unconscious activation of the cognitive control system in the human prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 5805–5811.

29.

Mandler

(1984). Mind and body: Psychology of emotion and stress. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

30.

Mandler

(2002). Consciousness recovered: Psychological functions and origins of conscious thought. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

31.

Marcel

A. J.

(1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 238–300.

32.

Mudrik

Lamy

Deouell

L. Y.

(2010). ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object-scene processing. Neuropsychologia, 48, 507–517.

33.

Posner

M. I.

(1998). Attention, self regulation and consciousness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 353, 1915–1927.

34.

Searle

J. R.

(1992). The rediscovery of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

35.

Stapel

D. A.

Koomen

(2006). The flexible unconscious: Investigating the judgmental impact of varieties of unaware perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 112–119.

36.

Tononi

Edelman

G. M.

(1998). Consciousness and complexity. Science, 282, 1846–1851.

37.

Tsuchiya

Koch

(2005). Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1096–1101.

38.

van Gulick

(1989). What difference does consciousness make? Philosophical Topics, 17, 211–230.

39.

Velmans

(2009). Understanding consciousness (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.

40.

Yang

Zald

Blake

(2007). Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression. Emotion, 7, 882–886.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

Integration Without Awareness

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material