Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Although film, television, and video play an important role in modern societies, the extent to which the similarities of cinematographic images to natural, unmediated conditions of visual experience contribute to viewers’ comprehension is largely an open question. To address this question, we compared 20 inexperienced adult viewers from southern Turkey with groups of medium- and high-experienced adult viewers from the same region. In individual sessions, each participant was shown a set of 14 film clips that included a number of perceptual discontinuities typical for film. The viewers’ interpretations were recorded and analyzed. The findings show that it is not the similarity to conditions of natural perception but the presence of a familiar line of action that determines the comprehensibility of films for inexperienced viewers. In the absence of such a line of action, extended prior experience is required for appropriate interpretation of cinematographic images such as those we investigated in this study.

Keywords

perception moving pictures film comprehension film literacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J.D.

(1996). The reality of illusion. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

Bordwell

(1986). Narration in the fiction film. London: Routledge.

Bordwell

Thompson

(2008). Film art: An introduction (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Forsdale

(1966). Film literacy. Teachers College Record, 67, 608–617.

Frith

Robson

J.E.

(1975). Perceiving the language of films. Perception, 4, 97–103.

Gerbner

Gross

Morgan

Signorelli

Shanahan

(2002). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In Bryant

Zillman

(Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 43–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Germeys

d’Ydevalle

(2007). The psychology of film: Perceiving beyond the cut. Psychological Research, 71, 458–466.

Giannetti

(2004). Understanding movies (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Gibson

J.J.

(1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

10.

Goldstein

R.B.

Woods

R.L.

Peli

(2007). Where people look when watching movies: Do all viewers look at the same place? Computers in Biology and Medicine, 37, 957–964.

11.

Hasson

Landesman

Knappmeyer

Igacio

Rubin

Heeger

D.J.

(2008). Neurocinematics: The neuroscience of film. Projections, 2, 1–26.

12.

Hasson

Nir

Levy

Fuhrmann

Malach

(2004). Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science, 303, 1634–1640.

13.

Hobbs

Frost

Davies

Stauffer

(1988). How first-time viewers comprehend editing conventions. Journal of Communication, 38, 50–60.

14.

Kraft

R.N.

(1986). The role of cutting in the evaluation and retention of film. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 155–163.

15.

Kraft

R.N.

Cantor

Gottdiener

(1991). The coherence of visual narratives. Communication Research, 18, 601–616.

16.

Levin

D.T.

Simons

D.J.

(2000). Perceiving stability in a changing world: Combining shots and integrating views in motion pictures and the real world. Media Psychology, 2, 357–380.

17.

Lowe

P.J.

Durkin

(1999). The effect of flashback on children’s understanding of television crime content. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 83–97.

18.

Magliano

J.P.

Dijkstra

Zwaan

R.A.

(1996). Generating predictive inferences while viewing a movie. Discourse Processes, 22, 199–224.

19.

Messaris

(1994). Visual literacy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

20.

Schwan

Hesse

F.W.

Garsoffky

(2000). Do film cuts facilitate the perceptual and cognitive organization of activity sequences? Memory & Cognition, 28, 214–223.

21.

Smith

Anderson

D.R.

Fischer

(1985). Young children’s comprehension of montage. Child Development, 56, 962–971.

22.

Zettl

(1990). Sight sound motion: Applied media aesthetics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.01 MB

0.02 MB