How is pictorial relief represented in visual awareness? Certainly not as a “depth map,” but perhaps as a map of local surface attitudes (Koenderink & van Doorn, 1995). Here we consider the possibility that observers might instead, or concurrently, represent local surface shape, a geometrical invariant with respect to motions. Observers judge local surface shape, in a picture of a piece of sculpture, on a five-point categorical scale. Categories are cap–ridge–saddle–rut–cup–flat, where “flat” denotes the absence of shape. We find that observers readily perform such a task, with full resolution of a shape index scale (cap–ridge–saddle–rut–cup), and with excellent self-consistency over days. There exist remarkable inter-observer differences. Over a group of 10 naive observers we find that the dispersion of judgments peaks at the saddle category. There may be a relation of this finding to the history of the topic—Alberti's (1827) omission of the saddle category in his purportedly exhaustive catalog of local surface shapes.
AlbertiL. B. (1972, original 1436). Della Pittura. (In English: On Painting. Harmondsworth: Penguin Classics)
2.
AmesA.Jr. (1925a). The illusion of depth from single pictures. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 10, 137–148. doi:10.1364/JOSA.10.000137
3.
AmesA.Jr. (1925b). Depth in pictorial art. The Art Bulletin, 8, 4–24. doi:10.1068/i0585
4.
BammesG. (2002). Die Gestalt des Menschen. Stuttgart: Urania. doi:10.1007/s12064-002-0015-6
5.
BarrowI. (1735). Geometrical lectures. London: Printed for Stephen Austen, at the Angel and Bible in St. Paul's Church-Yard. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29163-0
6.
BaxandallM. D. K. (1995). Shadows and enlightenment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.18.001804
7.
BellJ. L. (1998). A primer of infinitesimal analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.4236/jmp.2011.211172
ClarkK. (1956). The nude: A study in ideal form. Bollingen Series 35.2. New York, NY: Pantheon Books
10.
CodazziD. (1868/1869). Sulle coordinate curvilinee d'una superficie dello spazio. Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, 2, 101–119. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00690-1
11.
CoxeterH. S. M. (1961). Introduction to geometry. New York, NY: Blaisdell
12.
EnrightJ. T. (1991). Paradoxical monocular stereopsis and perspective vergence. In EllisS. R. (Ed.), Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (pp. 567–576). London: Taylor & Francis
13.
GaussC. F. (1827). Disquisitiones generales circa superficies curvas. Göttingen: Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften. (Presented to the Göttingen Royal Society, October 6, 1827.) First published Commentationes Societatis Regiae Scientiarum Gottingensis Recentiores, vol. VI. (Reprinted in Carl Friedrich Gauss Werke, Volume 4, pp. 217–258)
14.
GibsonJ. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
15.
HammJ. (1983). Drawing the head and figure. New York, NY: Perigee
16.
HattonR. G. (1910). Figure drawing. London: Chapman & Hall, Ltd
17.
HildebrandA. (1893). Das Problem der Form in der bildenden Kunst. Strasbourg: Heitz
18.
HogarthB. (1958). Dynamic anatomy. New York, NY: Watson-Guptill
19.
HornB. K. P.BrooksM. J. (1989). Shape from shading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
20.
KoenderinkJ. J. (1990). Solid shape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
21.
KoenderinkJ. J.van DoornA. J. (1992). Surface shape and curvature scales. Image and Vision Computing, 10(8), 557–565
22.
KoenderinkJ. J.van DoornA. J. (1995). Relief: Pictorial and otherwise. Image and Vision Computing, 13, 321–334. doi:10.1068/p130321
23.
KoenderinkJ. J.van DoornA. J. (2003). Local structure of Gaussian texture. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 86(7), 1165–1171. doi:10.1023/A:1011126920638
24.
KoenderinkJ. J.van DoornA. J. (2012). Gauge fields in pictorial space. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 5, 1213–1233. doi:10.1137/120861151
KoenderinkJ. J.van DoornA. J.KappersA. M. L.ToddJ. T. (2001). Ambiguity and the ‘mental eye’ in pictorial relief. Perception, 30, 431–448. doi:10.1068/p3030
LambertJ. H. (1760). Photometria, sive, De mensura et gradibus luminis, colorum et umbrae. Augsburg: V. E. Klett
29.
Leonardo daVinci (1452–1519). Codex Urbinas. Gathered together by Francesco Melzi before 1542. First printed in French and Italian as Trattato della pittura by Raffaelo du Fresne in 1651
30.
LillholmM.GriffinL. D. (2007). Statistics and category systems for the shape index descriptor of local image structure. Image and Vision Computing, 27(6), 771–781. doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2008.08.003
31.
LotzeH. (1852). Medicinische psychologie oder physiologie der seele. Leipzig: Weidmann'sche Buchhandlung
32.
MainardiG. (1856). Su la teoria generale delle superficie. Giornale dell' Istituto Lombardo, 9, 385–404. doi:10.1016/0315-0860(79)90075-2
33.
MetzgerW. (1975). Gesetze des Sehens. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Waldemar Kramer
34.
PollackP. (1955). A note on monocular depth-perception. The American Journal of Psychology, 68(2), 315–318. doi:10.2307/1418907
35.
PorteousI. R. (1994). Geometric differentiation for the intelligence of curves and surfaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
36.
RamachandranV. S. (1988). Perceiving shape from shading. Scientific American, 259, 76–83. doi:10.1038/331163a0
37.
RimmerW. (1962, original 1877). Art anatomy. New York, NY: Dover
38.
RogersL. R. (1969). The appreciation of the arts. Vol. 2: Sculpture. London: Oxford University Press
39.
SachsH., (1990). Isotrope Geometrie des Raumes. Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg & Sohn
40.
SchlosbergH. (1941). Stereoscopic depth from single pictures. The American Journal of Psychology, 54(4), 601–605. doi:10.2307/1417214
41.
SchwartzA. H. (1971). Stereoscopic perception with single pictures. Optical Spectra, 5, 25–27. doi:10.1068/i0585
SpelkeE. S. (2000). Core knowledge. American Psychologist, 55, 1233–1243. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1233
44.
SpivakM. (1999). A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry (Vol III, 3rd ed.). Houston: Publish or Perish
45.
StrubeckerK. (1941). Differentialgeometrie des isotropen Raumes. I. Theorie der Raumkurven. Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Sitzungsberichte IIa, 150, 1–53. doi:10.1016/j.cagd.2013.02.008
46.
StrubeckerK. (1942a). Differentialgeometrie des isotropen Raumes. II. Die Flächen konstanter Relativkrümmung K = rt – s2. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 47, 743–777
47.
StrubeckerK. (1942b). Differentialgeometrie des isotropen Raumes. III. Flächentheorie, Mathematische Zeitschrift, 48, 369–427. doi:10.1007/BF01180022
48.
StrubeckerK. (1944). Differentialgeometrie des isotropen Raumes. IV. Theorie der flächentreuen Abbildungen der Ebene. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 50, 1–92. doi:10.1007/BF01312437
49.
ThomR. (1972). Structural stability and morphogenesis. San Francisco, CA: W. A. Benjamin
van DoornA. J.KoenderinkJ. J.ToddJ. T.WagemansJ. (2012). Awareness of the light-field: The case of deformation. i-Perception, 3, 467–480. doi:10.1068/i0504
52.
YaglomI. M. (1979). A simple non-euclidean geometry and its physical basis. New York, NY: Springer
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
