Introduction: Understanding and following HIV self-testing (HIVST) instructions is a critical step in the use of HIVST kits. We analyzed data on pregnant women and their partners’ self-assessment on the usability of kits delivered by their pregnant women. Methods: Quantitative data were collected on 399 pregnant women and 238 male partners enrolled in the intervention arm of a large cluster-randomized HIVST trial. Each pregnant woman received HIVST demonstrations, detailed pictorial instructions on how to use OraQuick HIVST kits, and two kits; for herself and her male partner. Follow-up was at one month (baseline for male partners) and 3 months. Descriptive statistics were conducted to compare understanding and following of HIVST instructions by age and education level. Results: The proportion of those who understood HIVST instructions was almost the same (98%) for women and their partners, although partners (26.5%) were nearly twice as likely than women (16.0%) to report needing pretest counseling (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.27–2.79). Partners’ understanding of the HIVST instructions did not vary by education level, but 4.4% of women with primary education reported difficulty in understanding HIVST instructions compared with 0.5% and 0% of those with secondary and university education, respectively (p = 0.05). However, 5.6% of women aged 30–68 years and 3.3% of partners aged 20–24 years found it more difficult to understand the HIVST instructions. Conclusion: Both pregnant women and their male partners were correctly able to perform an HIVST without or (with minimal) support suggesting that this mode of delivery will help the national program reach more men. Because more male partners than women required HIVST pretest counseling support, male-targeted HIVST promotional messages may be needed to increase men's self-efficacy to perform HIVST unsupported.
UNAIDS. Global HIV statistics. Fact sheet – World AIDS Day 2019. Geneva: UNAIDS, 2019, pp. 1–6.
2.
UNAIDS. UNAIDS data. Geneva: UNAIDS, 2017, pp. 1–248.
3.
WHO. Global update on the health sector response to HIV. Geneva: WHO, 2014.
4.
World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on HIV testing services, 2015.
5.
IngoldHMwerindeORossAL, et al.The Self‐Testing AfRica (STAR) initiative: accelerating global access and scale‐up of HIV self‐testing. Journal of the International AIDS Society2019; 22: e25249.
6.
KurthAEClelandCMChhunN, et al.Accuracy and acceptability of oral fluid HIV self-testing in a general adult population in Kenya. AIDS and Behavior2016; 20(4): 870–879.
7.
ChokoATDesmondNWebbEL, et al.The uptake and accuracy of oral kits for HIV self-testing in high HIV prevalence setting: a cross-sectional feasibility study in Blantyre, Malawi. PLoS Medicine2011; 8(10): e1001102.
8.
UNAIDS. Global AIDS update. 2016. Geneva: UNAIDS.
9.
JohnsonCCKennedyCFonnerV, et al.Examining the effects of HIV self-testing compared to standard HIV testing services: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the International AIDS Society2017; 20(1): 1–10.
10.
WongVJenkinsEFordN, et al.To thine own test be true: HIV self‐testing and the global reach for the undiagnosed. Journal of the International AIDS Society2019; 22(Suppl 1): e25256.
11.
BulterysMAMujugiraANakyanziA, et al.Costs of providing HIV self-test kits to pregnant women living with HIV for secondary distribution to male partners in Uganda. Diagnostics2020; 10(5): 318.
12.
ChokoATCorbettELStallardN, et al.HIV self-testing alone or with additional interventions, including financial incentives, and linkage to care or prevention among male partners of antenatal care clinic attendees in Malawi: an adaptive multi-arm, multi-stage cluster randomised trial. PLoS medicine2019; 16(1): e1002719.
13.
MarwaTKaranjaSOseroJ, et al.The effects of HIV self-testing kits in increasing uptake of male partner testing among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in Kenya: a randomized controlled trial. The Pan African Medical Journal2019; 33: 1–11.
14.
GichangiAWambuaJMutwiwaS, et al.Impact of HIV self-test distribution to male partners of ANC clients: results of a randomized controlled trial in Kenya. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (1999)2018; 79(4): 467.
15.
MastersSHAgotKObonyoB, et al.Promoting partner testing and couples testing through secondary distribution of HIV self-tests: a randomized clinical trial. Plos medicine. 2016; 13(11): e1002166.
16.
PintyeJDrakeALBegnelE, et al.Acceptability and outcomes of distributing HIV self-tests for male partner testing in Kenyan maternal and child health and family planning clinics. Aids. 2019;33(8):1369.
17.
KorteJEKisaRVrana-DiazCJ, et al.HIV oral self-testing for male partners of women attending antenatal care in central Uganda: uptake and linkage to care post-test in a randomized trial. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2020; 84(3): 271–279.
18.
NapieralaSBairEFMarcusN, et al.Male partner testing and sexual behaviour following provision of multiple HIV self‐tests to Kenyan women at higher risk of HIV infection in a cluster randomized trial. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2020; 23: e25515.
19.
HatzoldKMutsetaMSibandaE, et al.Closing the HIV testing gap: facility-based integration of HIV self-testing, a way to improve testing coverage, yield and efficiency of client-initiated HIV testing services in Zimbabwe. In: 9th International AIDS Society Conference, Paris, 2017.
20.
BoluOOAllreadVCreekT, et al.Approaches for scaling up human immunodeficiency virus testing and counseling in prevention of mother-to-child human immunodeficiency virus transmission settings in resource-limited countries. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology2007; 197(3): S83–S89.
21.
ThirumurthyHMastersSHMavedzengeSN, et al.Promoting male partner HIV testing and safer sexual decision making through secondary distribution of self-tests by HIV-negative female sex workers and women receiving antenatal and post-partum care in Kenya: a cohort study. The Lancet HIV. 2016; 3(6): e266–e274.
22.
LippmanSAMoranLSeveliusJ, et al.Acceptability and feasibility of HIV self-testing among transgender women in san francisco: a mixed methods pilot study. AIDS and Behavior2016; 20(4): 928–938.
23.
NgureKHeffronRMugoN, et al.Feasibility and acceptability of HIV self‐testing among pre‐exposure prophylaxis users in Kenya. Journal of the International AIDS Society2017; 20(1): 1–8.
24.
SarkarAMburuGShivkumarPV, et al.Feasibility of supervised self-testing using an oral fluid-based HIV rapid testing method: a cross-sectional, mixed method study among pregnant women in rural India. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2016. 19: 1–11.
25.
HuangE.MarlinR. W.YoungS. D., et al.Using Grindr, a smartphone social-networking application, to increase HIV self-testing among Black and Latino men who have sex with men in Los Angeles, 2014. AIDS Education and Prevention. 2016; 28(4): 341–350.
26.
OyaroPKwenaZBukusiEA, et al.Is HIV self-testing a strategy to increase repeat testing among pregnant and postpartum women? A pilot mixed methods study. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2020; 84(4): 365–371.
27.
RondaGPortegijsPDinantGJ, et al.Use of diagnostic self-tests on body materials among internet users in the Netherlands: prevalence and correlates of use. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9(1): 1–6.
28.
IckenrothMHRondaGGrispenJE, et al.How do people respond to self-test results? A cross-sectional survey. BMC Family Practice. 2010; 11(1): 1–8.
29.
Van DykAC. Self-testing as strategy to increase the uptake of HIV testing in South Africa. African Journal of AIDS Research2013; 12(1): 41–48.
30.
GrésenguetGLongoJdDTonen-WolyecS, et al.Acceptability and usability evaluation of finger-stick whole blood HIV self-test as an hiv screening tool adapted to the general public in the Central African Republic. The open AIDS journal2017; 11: 101–118.
31.
Tonen-WolyecSBatina-AgasaSMuwongaJ, et al.Evaluation of the practicability and virological performance of finger-stick whole-blood HIV self-testing in French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS One2018; 13(1): e0189475.
32.
PeckRBLimJMVan RooyenH, et al.What should the ideal HIV self-test look like? a usability study of test prototypes in unsupervised HIV self-testing in Kenya, Malawi, and South Africa. AIDS and Behavior2014; 18(4): 422–432.
33.
ChipunguJBosomprahSZanoliniA, et al.Understanding linkage to care with HIV self-test approach in Lusaka, Zambia-A mixed method approach. Plos One2017; 12(11): e0187998.
34.
SimwingaMKumwendaMKDacombeRJ, et al.Ability to understand and correctly follow HIV self‐test kit instructions for use: applying the cognitive interview technique in Malawi and Zambia. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 2019; 22: e25253.
35.
HarrisPATaylorRThielkeR, et al.Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2009; 42(2): 377–381.
ZanoliniAChipunguJVinikoorMJ, et al.HIV self-testing in Lusaka Province, Zambia: acceptability, comprehension of testing instructions, and individual preferences for self-test kit distribution in a population-based sample of adolescents and adults. AIDS research and human retroviruses. 2018;34(3):254–260.
