The objective of this study was to investigate if patients diagnosed in community clinics have higher baseline CD4 cell counts than those diagnosed in Genitourinary medicine (GUM)/HIV clinics. We undertook a retrospective review of baseline CD4 cell counts for patients receiving a reactive HIV test in community-testing clinics. Eleven local HIV clinics were contacted to determine the baseline CD4 cell counts of these patients. Baseline CD4 cell counts of those diagnosed in the community were compared with mean local GUM/HIV clinic and median national baseline CD4 cell count for their year of diagnosis. Clients diagnosed in community settings had a mean baseline CD4 cell count of 481 cells/mm3 (SD 236 cells/mm3) and median baseline of 483 cells/mm3 (interquartile range 311–657 cells/mm3). This was significantly higher than those diagnosed in the GUM/HIV clinic local to the community-testing site (mean baseline CD4 397 cells/mm3, p = 0.014) and the national median for that year (336 cells/mm3, p < 0.001). HIV testing in community settings identifies patients at an earlier stage of infection than testing in clinical settings.
FarnhamPGopalappaCSansomSet al.Updates of lifetime costs of care and quality-of-life estimates for HIV-infected persons in the United States. JAIDS2013; 64: 183–189.
ThorntonADelpechVKallMet al.HIV testing in community settings in resource-rich countries: a systematic review of the evidence. HIV Med2012; 13: 416–426.
4.
Kall M, Thornton A, Nardone A, et al. Where do we diagnose HIV? Monitoring new diagnoses made in non-traditional settings. In: Seventeenth annual British HIV association conference, Bournemouth, abstract P161, 2011. London: HIV Medicine, p.68.
5.
LlewellynCPollardAMinersAet al.Understanding patient choices for attending sexually transmitted infection testing services: a qualitative study. Sex Transm Infect2012; 88: 504–509.
6.
Health Protection Agency. Mayisha II main study report: assessing the feasibility and acceptability of community based prevalence surveys of HIV among black Africans in England, London: Health Protection Agency, 2005, pp. 4, 6, 8–4, 6, 8.
7.
HorwoodJIngleSBurtonDet al.Sexual health risks, service use, and views of rapid point-of-care testing among men who have sex with men attending saunas: a cross-sectional survey. Int J STD AIDS2015; 27: 273–280.
8.
SweatMMorinSCelentanoDet al.Community-based intervention to increase HIV testing and case detection in people aged 16–32 years in Tanzania, Zimbabwe, and Thailand (NIMH Project Accept, HPTN 043): a randomised study. Lancet Infect Dis2011; 11: 525–532.
9.
GrabbeKMenziesNTaegtmeyerMet al.Increasing access to HIV counseling and testing through mobile services in Kenya: strategies, utilization, and cost-effectiveness. JAIDS2010; 54: 317–323.
10.
WachiraJKimaiyoSNdegeSet al.What is the impact of home-based HIV counseling and testing on the clinical status of newly enrolled adults in a large HIV care program in Western Kenya?Clin Infect Dis2011; 54: 275–281.
11.
LahuertaMSabidoMGiardinaFet al.Comparison of users of an HIV/syphilis screening community-based mobile van and traditional voluntary counselling and testing sites in Guatemala. Sex Transm Infect2010; 87: 136–140.
12.
MacPhersonPChawlaAJonesKet al.Feasibility and acceptability of point of care HIV testing in community outreach and GUM drop-in services in the North West of England: a programmatic evaluation. BMC Public Health2011; 11: 1–1.
13.
ManaviKWilliamsGNewtonR. The uptake of HIV and syphilis testing in a nurse-delivered service during Gay Pride events. Int J STD AIDS2012; 23: 887–889.
14.
SmithLRudyEJavanbakhtMet al.Client satisfaction with rapid HIV testing: comparison between an urban sexually transmitted disease clinic and a community-based testing center. AIDS Patient Care STDs2006; 20: 693–700.
15.
BaileyARobertsJWeatherburnPet al.Community HIV testing for men who have sex with men: results of a pilot project and comparison of service users with those testing in genitourinary medicine clinics. Sex Transm Infect2008; 85: 145–147.
16.
British HIV Association. Standards of care for people living with HIV in 2013. London: British HIV Association, http://www.bhiva.org/standards-of-care-2013.aspx/ (2012, accessed 30 September 2016).
17.
YinZBrownAHughesGet al.HIV in the United Kingdom 2014 report: data to end 2013, London: Public Health England, 2014, pp. 14–14.
18.
PedranaAStooveMBowringAet al.P5-S7.17 Accepting the good with the bad: “barriers and facilitators of community-based HIV testing services for gay men: a systematic review”. Sex Transm Infect2011; 87: A349–A349.
19.
GovindasamyDvan SchaikNKranzerKet al.Linkage to HIV care from a mobile testing unit in South Africa by different CD4 count strata. JAIDS2011; 58: 344–352.
20.
TripathiAGardnerLOgbuanuIet al.Predictors of time to enter medical care after a new HIV diagnosis: a statewide population-based study. AIDS Care2011; 23: 1366–1373.
21.
JennessSMyersJNeaigusAet al.Delayed entry into HIV medical care after HIV diagnosis: risk factors and research methods. AIDS Care2012; 24: 1240–1248.
22.
ListerNSmithATabriziSet al.Comprehensive clinical care on-site in men-only saunas: confidential STI/HIV screening outreach clinic. Int J STD AIDS2005; 16: 794–798.
23.
DaskalakisDSilveraRBernsteinKet al.Implementation of HIV testing at 2 new york city bathhouses: from pilot to clinical service. Clin Infect Dis2009; 48: 1609–1616.
24.
GerverSChadbornTIbrahimFet al.High rate of loss to clinical follow up among African HIV-infected patients attending a London clinic: a retrospective analysis of a clinical cohort. J Int AIDS Soc2010; 13: 3–4.
25.
ProstASserumaWFakoyaIet al.HIV voluntary counselling and testing for African communities in London: learning from experiences in Kenya. Sex Transm Infect2007; 83: 547–551.
