AndersonCFoxJGaventaJ (2020), “How do donor-led empowerment and accountability activities take scale into account?Evidence from DFID programmes in contexts of fragility, conflict and violence”, IDS Working Paper, Institute for Development Studies, Brighton.
2.
AuerbachA MLeBasAPostA EWeitz-ShapiroR (2018), “State, society, and informality in cities of the global South”, Studies in Comparative International DevelopmentVol 53, pages 261–280.
3.
BakkerK (2013), “Neoliberal versus postneoliberal water: geographies of privatization and resistance”, Annals of the Association of American GeographersVol 103, No 2, pages 253–260.
4.
BeardV AMitlinD (2021), “Water access in global South cities: the challenges of intermittency and affordability”, World DevelopmentVol 147, 105625.
5.
CoutardORutherfordJ (editors) (2016), Beyond the Networked City: Infrastructure Reconfigurations and Urban Change in the North and South, Routledge, Abingdon.
6.
DupontVJordhus-LierDSutherlandCBraathenE (editors) (2016), The Politics of Slums in the Global South: Urban Informality in Brazil, India, South Africa and Peru, Routledge, Abingdon and New York.
7.
ElwoodSLawsonV (2013), “Whose crisis? Spatial imaginaries of class, poverty and vulnerability”, Environment and Planning AVol 45, pages 103–108.
8.
EvansP (1996), “Government action, social capital and development: reviewing the action on synergy”, World DevelopmentVol 24, No 6, pages 1119–1132.
9.
FurlongK (2014), “STS beyond the ‘modern infrastructure ideal’: extending theory by engaging with infrastructure challenges in the South”, Technology in SocietyVol 38, pages 139–147.
10.
GoodfellowT (2022), Politics and the Urban Frontier: Transformation and Divergence in the Late Urbanizing East Africa, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
11.
GoodfellowTJackmanD (editors) (2023), Controlling the Capital: Political Dominance in the Urbanizing World, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12.
HasanA (2008), “Financing the sanitation programme of the Orangi Pilot Project – Research and Training Institute in Pakistan”, Environment and UrbanizationVol 20, No 1, pages 109–119.
13.
JaglinS (2014), “Regulating service delivery in Southern cities: rethinking urban heterogeneity”, in ParnellSOldfieldS (editors), The Routledge Handbook on Cities of the Global South, Routledge, Abingdon and New York, pages 434–447.
14.
Jordhus-LierDBraathenEDupontVSutherlandC (2016), “Knowledge and power in upgrading and resettlement initiatives”, in DupontVJordhus-LierDSutherlandCBraathenE (editors), The Politics of Slums in the Global South: Urban Informality in Brazil, India, South Africa and Peru, Routledge, Abingdon, pages 115–143.
15.
KamathL (2023), “Coalitions and urban transformation: contributions and limits”, Area Development and PolicyVol 8, No 1, pages 27–36.
16.
KeithMO’ClearyNParnellSReviA (2020), “Viewpoint. The future of the future city? The new urban sciences and a PEAK urban interdisciplinary disposition”, CitiesVol 105, 102820.
17.
LallRMehraRNarayanM (2024), “Co-producing knowledge in action: reflecting from the Main Bhi Dilli campaign for equitable planning in Delhi”, Planning TheoryVol 23, pages 356–376.
18.
LawhonMNsangi NakyagabaGKarpouzoglouT (2023), “Towards a modest imaginary? Sanitation in Kampala beyond the modern infrastructure ideal”, Urban StudiesVol 60, No 1, pages 146–165.
19.
LawsonVElwoodS (editors) (2018), Relational Poverty Politics: Forms, Struggles and Possibilities, University of Georgia Press, Georgia.
20.
LewanikaMMswelantoTKarakadzaiTLinesK (2024), “Experimenting with multistakeholder reform coalition: the case of the Urban Informality Forum in Zimbabwe”, ACRC Urban Reform Database Case Study, African Cities Research Consortium, The University of Manchester, Manchester, available at https://african-cities-database.org/urc-record-index/Urban-Informality-Forum-Zimbabwe/.
21.
LindellI (editor) (2010), Africa’s Informal Workers: Collective Agency, Alliances and Transnational Organizing in Urban Africa, The Nordic Africa Institute and Zed Books, Sweden, London and New York.
22.
LoganJ RMolotchH (1987), Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
23.
MacarthyJKoromoBCociñaCButcherSFredianiA A (2022), “The ‘slow anatomy of change’: urban knowledge trajectories towards an inclusive settlement upgrading agenda in Freetown, Sierra Leone”, Environment and UrbanizationVol 34, No 2, pages 294–312.
24.
MbabaziJMukwayaP IKisemboT (2024), “Innovative waste economies for inclusive urban development: a business model to change waste to wealth in informal settlements”, ACRC Urban Reform Database Case Study, African Cities Research Consortium, The University of Manchester, Manchester, available at https://african-cities-database.org/urc-record-index/Innovative-waste-economies-Kampala/.
25.
McFarlaneC (2011), “The city as a machine for learning”, Transactions of the Institute of British GeographersVol 36, pages 360–376.
26.
MiraftabF (2004), “Neoliberalism and casualization of public sector services: the case of waste collection services in Cape Town, South Africa”, International Journal of Urban and Regional ResearchVol 28, No 4, pages 874–892.
27.
MitlinD (2023), “The contribution of reform coalitions to inclusion and equity: lessons from urban social movements”, Area Development and PolicyVol 8, No 1, pages 1–26.
28.
MitlinDBennettJHornPKingSMakauJMasimba NyamaG (2019), “Knowledge matters: the potential contribution of the co-production of research to urban transformation”, GDI Working Paper, Global Development Institute, Manchester.
29.
MolotchH (1976), “The city as a growth machine: toward a political economy of place”, American Journal of SociologyVol 82, No 2, pages 309–332.
30.
NakyagabaG NLawhonMLwasaSSilverJTumwineF (2021), “Power, politics and a poo pump: contestation over legitimacy, access and benefits of sanitation technology in Kampala”, Singapore Journal of Tropical GeographyVol 42, No 3, pages 415–430.
31.
NilssonMMattesJ (2015), “The spatiality of trust: factors influencing the creation of trust and the role of face-to-face contacts”, European Management JournalVol 33, No 4, pages 230–244.
32.
OldfieldS (2015), “Between activism and the academy: the urban as political terrain”, Urban StudiesVol 52, No 11, pages 2072–2086.
33.
OrtizCPadanYDesmaisonBCastan BrotoVKisemboTMbabaziJMukwayaPNamuliHLwasaSRendellJ (2022) “Affective infrastructures of knowledge co-production”, The Urban Transcripts JournalVol 5, No 2.
34.
OumaS (2023), “Participation as ‘city-making’: a critical assessment of participatory planning in the Mukuru Special Planning Area in Nairobi, Kenya”, Environment and UrbanizationVol 35, No 2, pages 470–489.
35.
PatelZ (2022), “The potential and pitfalls of co-producing urban knowledge: rethinking spaces of engagement”, Methodological InnovationsVol 15, pages 374–386.
36.
PiperLVon LieresB (2011), “Expert advocacy for the marginalised: how and why democratic mediation matters to deepening democracy in the global South”, Development Research Centre: Citizenship, Participation and Accountability, Institute for Development Studies, Brighton.
37.
PiperLvon LieresB (2015), “Mediating between state and citizens: the significance of the informal politics of third-party representation in the global south”, Citizenship StudiesVol 19, No 6–7, pages 696–713.
38.
RollMAlmansiFHardoyJGattiSSamiosATurkenaLCamposMZubicarayG (2024), “Urban labs beyond Europe: the formation and contextualization of experimental climate governance in five Latin American cities”, Environment and UrbanizationVol 36, No 1, pages 173–194.
39.
SiameGWatsonV (2023), “Insights into relations in community-led urban interventions in the global South: civil society and co-production in Kampala”, Environment and UrbanizationVol 34, No 2, pages 517–535.
40.
SilverJ (2014), “Incremental infrastructures: material improvisation and social collaboration across post-colonial Accra”, Urban GeographyVol 35, No 6, pages 788–804.
41.
SimoneA (2019), Improvised Lives: Rhythms of Endurance in an Urban South, Polity Press, Cambridge.
42.
StoneC N (1989), Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta 1946–1988, University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.
43.
StoneC N (1993), “Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: a political economy approach”, Journal of Urban AffairsVol 15, No 1, pages 1–28.
44.
ThomasA (2008), “Whatever happened to reciprocity? Implications of donor emphasis on ‘voice’ and ‘impact’ as rationales for working with NGOs in development”, in BebbingtonA JHickeySMitlinD (editors), Can NGOs Make a Difference? The Challenge of Development Alternatives, Zed Books, London and New York.
45.
Trapenberg FrickK (2021), “No permanent friends, no permanent enemies: agonistic ethos, tactical coalitions, and sustainable infrastructure”, Journal of Planning Education and ResearchVol 41, No 1, pages 62–78.
46.
WatsonV (2003), “Conflicting rationalities: implications for planning theory and ethics”, Planning Theory and PracticeVol 4, No 4, pages 395–407.
47.
WinklerT (2013), “At the coalface: community–university engagements and planning education”, Journal of Planning Education and ResearchVol 33, No 2, pages 215–227.