This paper shows that the demographic growth of São Paulo's Metropolitan Area is very uneven. While the centre of the city is losing population, its farthest suburbs are growing quite fast. Furthermore, those fast growth areas are the poorest of the metropolitan area, with less infrastructure than other areas within the region and high levels of deforestation and informal land use. The objective of this paper is two-fold: first, it explains the reasons for these intra-urban dynamics by showing that the city is losing population in exactly the places where real estate investments are growing most significantly; second, it seeks to explore the environmental consequences of this pattern of urban sprawl — such as the occupation of environmentally protected areas — by presenting data on forest cover reduction. The approach is original in that it contrasts socioeconomic, demographic and environmental trends within the city of São Paulo according to the rate of population growth of each of the city's areas, instead of employing the more conventional comparison of municipalities.
Allen, J.C. and D.F. Barnes (1985), “The causes of deforestation in developing countries”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers Vol 75, pages 163—184.
2.
Anselin, L. (1996), “ Interactive techniques and exploratory spatial data analysis”, West Virginia University Regional Research Institute Working Paper No 9627.
3.
Bonduk, Nabil and Rachel Rolnik (1979), Periferia — Ocupação do Espaço e Reprodução da Força de Trabalho, FAU/USP and Fundação para a Pesquisa Ambiental, São Paulo.
4.
Budds, Jessica with Paulo Teixeira and Sehab ( 2005), “Ensuring the right to the city: pro-poor housing, urban development and tenure legalization in São Paulo, Brazil”, Environment & Urbanization Vol 17, No 1, April, pages 89—114.
5.
Caldeira, Teresa (2000), City of Walls: Crime, Segregation and Citizenship in São Paulo, University of California Press, Berkeley.
6.
Dean, Warren (1995), With Broadax and Firebrand: The Destruction of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, Stuart B Schwartz, New York.
7.
Duany, Andres, E.P. Zyberk and J. Speck (2000), Suburban Nation: The Rise of the Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream, North Point Press, New York.
8.
Embraesp Bulletin1985—2003, São Paulo.
9.
Fernandes, Edésio (2007), “Implementing the urban reform agenda in Brazil”, in this issue ofEnvironment & Urbanization.
10.
Fundação SOS Mata Atlântica (1998), Atlas da Evolução dos Remanescentes Florestais e Ecossistemas Associados do Domínio da Mata Atlântica no Período 1990—1995, Fundação SOS Mata Atlântica/Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, São Paulo.
11.
Grostein, Marta (1987), “A cidade clandestina: os ritos e os mitos. O papel da irregularidade na estruturação do espaço urbano no município de São Paulo — 1900—1987”, Doctoral thesis, FAU/USP , São Paulo.
12.
Jacobi, P.R. (1994), “Households and environment in the city of São Paulo: perceptions and solutions”, Environment & Urbanization Vol 6, No 2, October, pages 87—110.
13.
Kovarick, Lúcio (1979), A EspoliaçãoUrbana, Paz e Terra, Rio de Janeiro.
14.
Lino, L F (editor) (1992), Reserva da Biosfera da Mata Atlântica. Plano de Ação. Vol 1: Referências Básicas, Consórcio Mata Atlântica eUniversidade Estadual de Campinas .
15.
Livi-Bacci, M. and G. De Santis (1998), Population and Poverty in Developing Countries, Oxford University Press, International Studies in Demography , Oxford.
16.
Maricato, E. (1979), “Autoconstrução, a arquitetura possível ”, in Maricato, Ermínia (editor) A Produção da Casa (e da Cidade) no Brasil Industria, AlfaÔmega, São Paulo.
17.
Maricato, Ermínia (1996), Metrópole na Periferia do Capitalismo: Ilegalidade , Desigualdade e Violência, HUCITEC, São Paulo.
18.
Marcondes, M J A (1996), “Urbanização e meio ambiente: os mananciais da metrópole paulista ”, Doctoral thesis, FAU/USP, São Paulo.
19.
Marcondes, M J A (1999), Cidade e Natureza: Proteção dos Mananciais e Exclusão Social, Studio Nobel /Editora da USP / FAPESP (Coleção Diade Aberta), São Paulo.
20.
Marques, E. (2005), “A dinâmica imobiliária de incorporação em período recente”, in E Marques and H Torres (editors), São Paulo: Segregação, Pobreza Urbana e Desigualdade Social, Editora do Senac, São Paulo.
21.
Marques, E. and C. Saraiva (2005), “As políticas de habitação social no município de São Paulo”, in E Marques and H Torres (editors), São Paulo: Segregação, Pobreza Urbana e Desigualdade Social, Editora do Senac, São Paulo.
22.
Martine, George (2001), “The sustainable use of space: advancing the population/environment agenda”, Paper presented at the Cyber Seminars of the Population—Environment Research Network, accessible at www.populationevironmentresearch.org .
23.
Mather, A.S. and C.L. Needle (2000), “The relationships of population and forest trends”, The Geographical Journal Vol 166, pages 2—13.
24.
PRODES—INPE (2004), Monitoramento Ambiental da Amazônia por Satélite, accessible at www.inpe.br.
25.
Sabatini, F., G. Cáceres and J. Cerda (2001), “Residential segregation pattern changes in Chile's main cities: scale shifts and increasing malignancy”, Paper presented at the International Seminar on Segregation and the City, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 26—28 July, Cambridge, Mass.
26.
Sehab (2003), Plano Municipal de Habitação, PMSP, São Paulo.
27.
Torres, H.G. (2002a), “Population and the environment: a view from Brazilian metropolitan areas”, in D Hogan, E Berquó and H Costa, Population and Environment in Brazil , CNPD/ABEP/NEPO, Campinas , pages 147—166.
28.
Torres, H.G. (2002b), Social Policies for the Urban Poor: The Role of Population Information Systems, UNFPA Country Support Team for LatinAmerica and Caribbean, Mexico City.
29.
Torres, H.G. (2004), “Segregação residencial e políticas públicas: São Paulo na década de 1990”, Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais No 54, pages 41—56.
30.
Torres, H. (2005), “A fronteira paulistana”, in E Marques and H Torres (editors), São Paulo: Segregação, Pobreza Urbana e Desigualdade Social, Editora do Senac, São Paulo.
31.
Waldvogel, B.C. (2003), “Projeção de população como instrumento de planejamento”, São Paulo emPerspectiva Vol 17, No 3—4, pages 67—79.
