Form-finding is an essential task in the design of efficient lightweight structures. It is based on the crucial assumption of one single shape-determining load case, usually represented by self-weight. Adaptive components integrated into the structure open a way to even more efficient lightweight designs, as such structures can adapt their shapes to varying external loads and redistribute internal forces. This article presents a method for form-finding of adaptive truss structures subject to multiple, independently acting load cases, also incorporating possible design constraints. To ensure the consistency of the manufacturing lengths of passive elements in all load cases, special constraints are considered. The method enables to reduce sensitivity of the structural shape with respect to various different loads by means of actuation to meet design and serviceability requirements with a lower structural mass compared to conventional design strategies. This is demonstrated within a replaced real-world-like setting of an adaptive suspension truss bridge.
BletzingerKURammE.A general finite element approach to the form finding of tensile structures by the updated reference strategy. Int J Space Struct1999; 14(2): 131–145.
2.
HookeR.A description of helioscopes and some other instruments. London: Printed by T.R, 1676.
3.
AddisB.Physical Models. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn Verlag, 2020.
4.
TomlowJ.Das Modell: Antoni Gaudis Hängemodell und seine Rekonstruktion; neue Erkenntnisse zum Entwurf für die Kirche der Colonia Güell. PhD Thesis, Krämer Verlag, Stuttgart, 1989.
5.
IslerH.Concrete shells derived from experimental shapes. Struct Eng Int1994; 4(3): 142–147.
6.
ChiltonJ.Heinz Isler. The engineer’s contribution to contemporary architecture. London: Thomas Telford Publishing, 2000.
7.
RammE.Heinz Isler Shells – the priority of form. J Int Assoc Shell Spatial Struct2011; 52(3): 143–154.
8.
FaberCArupO.Candela, the shell builder. New York: Reinhold Pub. Corp, 1963.
VrachliotisGKleinmannsJKunzM, et al. (eds). Frei Otto. Thinking by modeling. Leipzig: Spector Books, 2016.
11.
RaschBOttoF.Finding form: towards an architecture of the minimal. London: Axel Menges, 1995.
12.
CourantR.Soap film experiments with minimal surfaces. Am Math Mon1940; 47(3): 167–174.
13.
EekhoutM.Frei Otto and the Munich Olympic games. From the measuring experimental models to the computer determination of the pattern. Zodiac1972; 21: 12–74.
14.
LeonhardtFSchlaichJ.Vorgespannte Seilnetz-konstruktionen. Das Olympiadach in München. Stahlbau1972; 41(9, 10, 12): 298–367.
15.
BletzingerK.Simulationsmethoden im textilen Leichtbau – Die Entwicklung seit 1972 und aktueller Stand. Bautechnik2015; 92(11): 800–805.
16.
BletzingerKUWüchnerRDaoudF, et al. Computational methods for form finding and optimization of shells and membranes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2005; 194(30-33): 3438–3452.
17.
VeenendaalDBlockP.An overview and comparison of structural form finding methods for general networks. Int J Solids Struct2012; 49(26): 3741–3753.
18.
DayA.An introduction to dynamic relaxation. Engineer1965; 219: 218–221.
19.
DayABunceJ.The analysis of hanging roofs. Arup J1969; 3: 30–31.
20.
BarnesM. Applications of dynamic relaxation to the design and analysis of cable, membrane, and pneumatic structures. In: 2nd International conference on space structures, Guildford, Surrey, 1975.
21.
WakefieldD.Pretensioned networks supported by compression arches. PhD Thesis, The City University London, London, 1980.
22.
HaugE.Berechnung von Seilfachwerken. Mitteilungen des Instituts für Leichte Flächentragwerke (IL), 1/70, Stuttgart, 1970.
23.
HaugEPowellG. Analytical shape finding for cable nets. In: Proceedings of 1971 IASS Symposium Pacific Part II on tension structures and space frames, Tokyo and Kyoto, Japan, 1972, pp. 83–92.
24.
OhyamaMKawamataS. A problem of surface design for prestressed cable nets. In: Proceedings of 1971 IASS Symposium Pacific Part II on tension structures and space frames. Tokyo and Kyoto, Japan, 1971.
25.
ArgyrisJHAngelopoulosTBichatB.A general method for the shape finding of lightweight tension structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng1974; 3(1): 135–149.
26.
BuflerHNguyen-TuongB.On the work theorems in nonlinear network theory. Ing Arch1980; 49(3-4): 275–286.
27.
HaugEPowellG. Finite element analysis of nonlinear membrane structures. In: Proceedings of 1971 IASS symposium Pacific Part II on tension structures and space frames, Tokyo and Kyoto, Japan, 1971, pp. 165–175.
28.
HaberRBAbelJFGreenbergDP.An integrated design system for cable reinforced membranes using interactive computer graphics. Comput Struct1981; 14(3-4): 261–280.
29.
TabarrokBQinZ.Nonlinear analysis of tension structures. Comput Struct1992; 45(5-6): 973–984.
30.
LinkwitzKSchekHJ.Einige Bemerkungen zur Berechnung von vorgespannten Seilnetzkonstruktionen. Ing Arch1971; 40(3): 145–158.
31.
LinkwitzK. New methods for the determination of cutting pattern of prestressed cable nets and their application to the Olympic roofs München. In: Proceedings of the IASS symposium, Tokyo and Kyoto, 1971, Japan, pp. 3–15.
32.
SchekHJ.The force density method for form finding and computation of general networks. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng1974; 3(1): 115–134.
33.
KötterE.Über die Möglichkeit, n Punkte in der Ebene oder im Raume durch weniger als 2n−3 oder 3n−6 Stäbe von ganz unveränderlicher Länge unverschieblich miteinander zu verbinden. Leipzig: Festschrift Heinrich Müller-Breslau, 1912, pp. 61–80.
34.
LinkwitzKSchekHGründigL.Die Gleichge-wichtsberechnung von Seilnetzen unter Zusatzbedingungen. Ing Arch1974; 43: 183–192.
35.
GründigL.Die Berechnung vorgespannter Seil- und Hängenetze unter Berücksichtigung ihrer topologischen und physikalischen Eigenschaften und der Ausgleichungsrechnung. Number 216 in Dissertation, Universität Stuttgart, Deutsche Wissenschaften, Reihe C: Dissertationen. München, 1976.
36.
MalerbaPGPatelliMQuagliaroliM.An extended force density method for the form finding of cable systems with new forms. Struct Eng Mech2012; 42: 191–210.
37.
KemmlerR.Formfindung: Die Interaktion von Kraft und Geometrie. Stahlbau2012; 81(6): 476–480.
38.
Aboul-NasrGMouradSA.An extended force density method for form finding of constrained cable nets. Case Stud Struct Eng2015; 3: 19–32.
39.
SingerP.Die Berechnung von Minimalflächen, Seifenblasen, Membrane und Pneus aus geodätischer Sicht. PhD Thesis, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, 1995.
40.
MaurinBMotroR.The surface stress density method as a form-finding tool for tensile membranes. Eng Struct1998; 20(8): 712–719.
41.
PaulettiRMOPimentaPM. The natural force density method for the shape finding of taut structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2008; 197(49-50): 4419–4428.
42.
MaxwellJCXLV. On reciprocal figures and diagrams of forces. Lond Edinb Dubl Philos Mag J Sci1864; 27(182): 250–261.
43.
BlockPOchsendorfJ.Thrust network analysis: A new methodology for three-dimensional equilibrium. J Int Assoc Shell Spatial Struct2007; 48(3): 1–7.
44.
BlockP.Thrust network analysis: exploring three-dimensional equilibrium. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2009.
45.
GründigLMoncrieffESingerP, et al. A history of the principal developments and applications of the force density method in Germany 1970–1999. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Colloquium on Computation of Shell & Spatial Structures (IASS-IACM 2000), Chania-Crete, Greece, 2000.
46.
AdriaenssensSBlockPVeenendaalD, et al. (eds). Shell structures for architecture: Form finding and optimization. London: Routledge, 2014.
47.
BletzingerKLinhardJWüchnerR.Extended and integrated numerical form finding and patterning of membrane structures. J Int Assoc Shell Spatial Struct2009; 50(1): 35–49.
48.
DieringerFWüchnerRBletzingerK.Practical advances in numerical form finding and cutting pattern generation for membrane structures. J Int Assoc Shell Spatial Struct2012; 53(3): 147–156.
49.
BletzingerKUFirlMLinhardJ, et al. Optimal shapes of mechanically motivated surfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2010; 199(5-8): 324–333.
50.
SobekW.Ultra-lightweight construction. Int J Space Struct2016; 31(1): 74–80.
WadaBDasS.Intelligent structures. Monitoring and control. In: WenY (ed.) Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Intelligent Systems, Perugia, Italy, 27–29 June 1991. CRC Press, 1992.
55.
KorkmazS.A review of active structural control: challenges for engineering informatics. Comput Struct2011; 89(23-24): 2113–2132.
56.
KirschUMosesF.Optimization of structures with control forces and displacements. Eng Optim1977; 3(1): 37–44.
57.
Holnicki-SzulcJMackiewiczAKolakowskiP.Design of adaptive structures for improved load capacity. AIAA J1998; 36(3): 471–476.
58.
HaftkaRT.Optimum placement of controls for static deformations of space structures. AIAA J1984; 22(9): 1293–1298.
59.
KirschU.Optimal design of structural control systems. Eng Optim1991; 17(1-2): 141–155.
60.
DasSUtkuSChenG, et al. A mathematical basis for the design optimization of adaptive trussesin precision control. In: 32nd Structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. Baltimore, MD: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1991.
61.
WagnerJLGadeJHeidingsfeldM, et al. On steady-state disturbance compensability for actuator placement in adaptive structures. at Automatisierungstechnik2018; 66(8): 591–603.
62.
KirschU.Synthesis of elastic structures with controlled forces. Comput Struct1976; 6(2): 111–116.
63.
TeuffelP.Entwerfen adaptiver Strukturen. PhD Thesis, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, 2004.
64.
GeigerFGadeJvon SchevenM, et al. A case study on design and optimization of adaptive civil structures. Front Built Environ2020; 6: 1–13.
65.
HaćALiuL.Sensor and actuator location in motion control of Flexible Structures. J Sound Vib1993; 167(2): 239–261.
66.
KwanASKPellegrinoS. Prestressing a space structure. AIAA J1993; 31(10): 1961–1963.
67.
ReksowardojoAPSenatoreGSmithIFC. Actuator layout optimization for adaptive structures performing large shape changes. In: SmithIFCDomerB (eds) Advanced Computing Strategies for engineering, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 111–129.
68.
SachseRGeigerFvon SchevenM, et al. Motion design with efficient actuator placement for adaptive structures that perform large deformations. Front Built Environ2021; 7: 1–13.
69.
MaschingHBletzingerKU.Parameter free structural optimization applied to the shape optimization of smart structures. Finite Elem Anal Des2016; 111: 33–45.
70.
SenatoreGReksowardojoAP.Force and shape control strategies for minimum energy adaptive structures. Front Built Environ2020; 6: 1–28.
71.
WangYSenatoreG.Minimum energy adaptive structures – all-in-one problem formulation. Comput Struct2020; 236: 1–21.
72.
VeuveNSychterzACSmithIFC. Adaptive control of a deployable tensegrity structure. Eng Struct2017; 152: 14–23.
73.
WangYXuXLuoY.Minimal mass design of active tensegrity structures. Eng Struct2021; 234: 1–17.
74.
Rhode-BarbarigosLCharpentierVAdriaenssensS, et al. Dialectic form finding of structurally integrated adaptive structures. Am J Eng Appl Sci2015; 8(4): 443–454.
TontiE.The reason for analogies between physical theories. Appl Math Model1976; 1(1): 37–50.
77.
StrangG.Introduction to applied mathematics. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley-Cambridge Press, 1986.
78.
BletzingerK-U. Die Freiheit von Kraft und Form. Oral presentation, VDI, München, 4 October 2022.
79.
LinkwitzK.Formfinding by the “direct approach” and pertinent strategies for the conceptual design of prestressed and Hanging Structures. Int J Space Struct1999; 14(2): 73–87.
80.
LinkwitzK.Über eine neue Anwendung der Gauß’schen Methode der kleinsten Quadrate: Die Formfindung und statische Analyse von räumlichen Seil- und Hängenetzen. Abh Braunschw Wiss Ges1977; 27: 121–153.
81.
LinkwitzKVeenendaalD. Nonlinear force density method: constraints of force and geometry (Chapter 12). In: AdriaenssensSBlockPVeenendaalD, et al. (eds) Shell structures for architecture: form finding and optimization. London: Routledge, 2014, pp. 143–156.
82.
GöppertKHaspelL.National Stadium Warsaw, Poland. Struct Eng Int2013; 23(3): 311–316.
83.
KeilALindenS.Mit kühnem Schwung. Eine einseitig aufgehängte Fußgängerbrücke in Gelsenkirchen. Stahlbau2010; 79(2): 96–105.
84.
IbrahimbegovicAKnopf-LenoirCKučerováA, et al. Optimal design and optimal control of structures undergoing finite rotations and elastic deformations. Int J Numer Methods Eng2004; 61(14): 2428–2460.
85.
SachseRBischoffM.A variational formulation for motion design of adaptive compliant structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng2021; 122(4): 972–1000.
86.
SteffenSNitzladerMBurghardtT, et al. An actuator concept for adaptive concrete columns. Actuators2021; 10(273): 1–16.
87.
JanochaH (ed.). Actuators. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004.
88.
BurghardtTHonoldCBohmM, et al. Entwicklung von Aktoren für ein adaptives Hochhaustragwerk. Konstruktion2023; 74(01-02): 68–74.
89.
BinzHKreimeyerMRothD, et al. Weltweit erstes adaptives Hochhaus mit adaptivem Tragwerk und adaptiven Fassaden. Newsletter Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft für Produktentwicklung WiGeP, 2021, pp. 5–7.
90.
SobekWSawodnyOBischoffM, et al. Adaptive Hüllen und Strukturen. Bautechnik2021; 98(3): 208–221.
91.
BurghardtTHonoldCBachmannM, et al. Anforderungsermittlung für adaptive Stützen und Aussteifungselemente in Tragkonstruktionen/requirements determination for adaptive supports and bracing elements in building structures. Konstr2021; 73(10): 64–70.
92.
LynessJNMolerCB.Numerical differentiation of analytic functions. SIAM J Numer Anal1967; 4(2): 202–210.
93.
SquireWTrappG.Using complex variables to estimate derivatives of real functions. SIAM Rev1998; 40(1): 110–112.
94.
MartinsJRRASturdzaPAlonsoJJ.The complex-step derivative approximation. ACM Trans Math Softw2003; 29(3): 245–262.
