Additive manufacturing (AM) is revolutionizing healthcare by enabling the creation of customized 3D printed (3DP) medical equipment, implants, orthoses, prosthetics, drugs, and organs. With the availability of different types of materials suitable for 3DP and healthcare applications, this technology allows for the precise fabrication of patient-oriented prosthetics, dental implants, and orthopedic devices, significantly improving fit and functionality. Additionally, 3DP drugs, such as Oral Dispersible Formulations (ODFs) and polypills, are surpassing the traditional “one pill fits all” concept, offering more tailored medication solutions. This innovation also supports the development of personalized medications and bioprinted tissues, opening the way for advancements in regenerative medications and tailored therapies. 3D-bioprinted organs are addressing the growing demand for organ transplants. In surgical planning, 3D-printed anatomical models provide students and professionals with hands-on practice, which is crucial for skill development and understanding complex anatomies. Surgeons can also practice and refine techniques before actual procedures, enhancing precision and improving outcomes during real operations. This paper focus on highlighting the progression and motivations behind the cross-disciplinary applications of AM within the healthcare sector providing customized medical devices, drug delivery systems and diagnostic tools for personalized treatment and skill refinement. This paper is designed for a broad audience, including manufacturing professionals and researchers, who are interested in exploring the medical implications of this transformative technology.
JandyalAChaturvediIWazirI, et al. 3D printing – a review of processes, materials and applications in industry 4.0. Sustain Oper Comput2022; 3: 33–42.
2.
TaufikMJainPK.Additive manufacturing: current scenario. In: Proceedings of international conference on: advanced production and industrial engineering-ICAPIE, 2016, pp.380–386.
3.
GiannatsisJDedoussisV.Additive fabrication technologies applied to medicine and health care: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2009; 40(1–2): 116–127.
4.
da SilvaLRRSalesWFCamposFDAR, et al. A comprehensive review on additive manufacturing of medical devices. Prog Addit Manuf2021; 6(3): 517–553.
5.
VakhariaVNKhanSMaratheK, et al. Printing in a pandemic: 3D printing solutions for healthcare during COVID-19. A protocol for a PRISMA systematic review. Ann 3D Print Med2021; 2: 100015.
6.
SunYSohS.Printing tablets with fully customizable release profiles for personalized medicine. Adv Mater2015; 27(47): 7847–7853.
7.
KhaledSABurleyJCAlexanderMR, et al. 3D printing of five-in-one dose combination polypill with defined immediate and sustained release profiles. J Control Release2015; 217: 308–314.
8.
BallardDHMillsPDuszakRJr, et al. Medical 3D printing cost-savings in orthopedic and maxillofacial surgery: cost analysis of operating room time saved with 3D printed anatomic models and surgical guides. Acad Radiol2020; 27(8): 1103–1113.
9.
HuangYJLinKHChenYY, et al. Feasibility and clinical effectiveness of three-dimensional printed model-assisted nuss procedure. Ann Thorac Surg2019; 107(4): 1089–1096.
10.
SuccoGBerroneMBattistonB, et al. Step-by-step surgical technique for mandibular reconstruction with fibular free flap: application of digital technology in virtual surgical planning. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol2015; 272(6): 1491–1501.
11.
LioufasPAQuayleMRLeongJC, et al. 3D printed models of cleft palate pathology for surgical education. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2016; 4(9): e1029–NaN6.
12.
LinQSLinYXWuXY, et al. Utility of 3-dimensional–printed models in enhancing the learning curve of surgery of tuberculum sellae meningioma. World Neurosurg2018; 113: e222–e231.
13.
ÖblomHZhangJPimparadeM, et al. 3D-Printed isoniazid tablets for the treatment and prevention of tuberculosis—personalized dosing and drug release. AAPS PharmSciTech2019; 20(2): 52–13.
14.
XuJOngHXTrainiD, et al. The utility of 3D-printed airway stents to improve treatment strategies for central airway obstructions. Drug Dev Ind Pharm2019; 45(1): 1–10.
15.
ZhuMLiKZhuY, et al. 3D-printed hierarchical scaffold for localized isoniazid/rifampin drug delivery and osteoarticular tuberculosis therapy. Acta Biomater2015; 16: 145–155.
16.
SalguedoMZarateGCoronelJ, et al. Low-cost 3D-printed inverted microscope to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a MODS culture. Tuberculosis2022; 132: 102158.
17.
AhangarPCookeMEWeberMH, et al. Current biomedical applications of 3D printing and additive manufacturing. Appl Sci2019; 9(8): 1713.
18.
NgWLAnJChuaCK.Process, material, and regulatory considerations for 3D printed medical devices and tissue constructs. Engineering2024; 36: 146–166.
19.
Amaya-RivasJLPereroBSHelgueroCG, et al. Future trends of additive manufacturing in medical applications: an overview. Heliyon2024; 10(5): e26641.
20.
CailleauxSSanchez-BallesterNMGuecheYA, et al. Fused deposition modeling (FDM), the new asset for the production of tailored medicines. J Control Release2021; 330: 821–841.
21.
HaryńskaAKucinska-LipkaJSulowskaA, et al. Medical-grade PCL based polyurethane system for FDM 3D printing-characterization and fabrication. Materials2019; 12(6): 887.
22.
BaniasadiHAbidnejadRFazeliM, et al. Innovations in hydrogel-based manufacturing: a comprehensive review of direct ink writing technique for biomedical applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci2024; 324: 103095.
23.
Seoane-ViañoIJanuskaitePAlvarez-LorenzoC, et al. Semi-solid extrusion 3D printing in drug delivery and biomedicine: personalised solutions for healthcare challenges. J Control Release2021; 332: 367–389.
24.
HonigmannPSharmaNOkoloB, et al. Patient-specific surgical implants made of 3D printed PEEK: material, technology, and scope of surgical application. Biomed Res Int2018; 2018: 4520636.
25.
RivetIDialamiNCerveraM, et al. Mechanical analysis and optimized performance of G-code driven material extrusion components. Addit Manuf2023; 61: 103348.
26.
RezaieFFarshbafMDahriM, et al. 3D printing of dental prostheses: current and emerging applications. J Compos Sci2023; 7(2): 80.
27.
Sakib-Uz-ZamanCKhondokerMAH. Polymer-based additive manufacturing for orthotic and prosthetic devices: industry outlook in Canada. Polymers2023; 15(6): 1506.
28.
HuangJ-JRenJ-AWangG-F, et al. 3D-printed “fistula stent” designed for management of enterocutaneous fistula: an advanced strategy. World J Gastroenterol2017; 23(41): 7489–7494.
29.
ShinkarKRhodeK.Could 3D extrusion bioprinting serve to be a real alternative to organ transplantation in the future?Ann 3D Print Med2022; 7: 100066.
30.
MaKChenHShenY, et al. Feasibility study and material selection for powder-bed fusion process in printing of denture clasps. Comput Biol Med2023; 157: 106772.
31.
GayerCRitterJBullemerM, et al. Development of a solvent-free polylactide/calcium carbonate composite for selective laser sintering of bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C2019; 101: 660–673.
32.
LiJLiZShiY, et al. In vitro and in vivo comparisons of the porous Ti6Al4V alloys fabricated by the selective laser melting technique and a new sintering technique. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2019; 91: 149–158.
33.
SurmenevaMAKhrapovDProsolovK, et al. The influence of chemical etching on porous structure and mechanical properties of the Ti6AL4V functionally graded porous scaffolds fabricated by EBM. Mater Chem Phys2022; 275: 125217.
34.
LowtherMLouthSDaveyA, et al. Clinical, industrial, and research perspectives on powder bed fusion additively manufactured metal implants. Addit Manuf2019; 28: 565–584.
35.
TortoriciMGayerCTorchioA, et al. Inner strut morphology is the key parameter in producing highly porous and mechanically stable poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds via selective laser sintering. Mater Sci Eng C2021; 123: 111986.
36.
AttaeyanAShahgholiMKhandanA.Fabrication and characterization of novel 3D porous titanium-6Al-4V scaffold for oOrthopedic application using selective laser melting technique. Iran J Chem Chem Eng2024; 43(11): 66–82.
37.
AndjelaLAbdurahmanovichVMVladimirovnaSN, et al. A review on vat photopolymerization 3D-printing processes for dental application. Dent Mater2022; 38(11): e284–e296.
38.
GuillaumeOGevenMAVarjasV, et al. Orbital floor repair using patient specific osteoinductive implant made by stereolithography. Biomaterials2020; 233: 119721.
39.
LiYMaoQYinJ, et al. Theoretical prediction and experimental validation of the digital light processing (DLP) working curve for photocurable materials. Addit Manuf2021; 37: 101716.
40.
TumblestonJRShirvanyantsDErmoshkinN, et al. Continuous liquid interface of 3D objects. Science2015; 347(80): 1349–1352.
41.
TahayeriAMorganMFugolinAP, et al. 3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials. Dent Mater2018; 34(2): 192–200.
42.
PagacMHajnysJMaQP, et al. A review of vat photopolymerization technology: materials, applications, challenges, and future trends of 3D printing. Polymers2021; 13(4): 1–20.
43.
WhitleyD3rdEidsonRSRudekI, et al. In-office fabrication of dental implant surgical guides using desktop stereolithographic printing and implant treatment planning software: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent2017; 118(3): 256–263.
44.
XuXAwadARobles-MartinezP, et al. Vat photopolymerization 3D printing for advanced drug delivery and medical device applications. J Control Release2021; 329: 743–757.
45.
SenKMehtaTSansareS, et al. Pharmaceutical applications of powder-based binder jet 3D printing process – a review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2021; 177: 113943.
46.
LuADuggalIDaihomBA, et al. Unraveling the influence of solvent composition on drop-on-demand binder jet 3D printed tablets containing calcium sulfate hemihydrate. Int J Pharm2024; 649: 123652.
47.
ElliottAAlSalihiSMerrimanAL, et al. Infiltration of nanoparticles into porous binder jet printed parts. Am J Eng Appl Sci2016; 9(1): 128–133.
48.
SalmiM.Possibilities of preoperative medical models made by 3D printing or additive manufacturing. J Med Eng2016; 2016: 1–6.
49.
OchoaEMorelliLSalvioniL, et al. Co-processed materials testing as excipients to produce orally disintegrating tablets (ODT) using binder jet 3D-printing technology. Eur J Pharm Biopharm2024; 194: 85–94.
50.
MatsumotoJSMorrisJMFoleyTA, et al. Three-dimensional physical modeling: applications and experience at mayo clinic. Radiographics2015; 35(7): 1989–1988.
51.
GülcanOGünaydınKTamerA.The state of the art of material jetting—a critical review. Polymers2021; 13(16): 2829.
52.
DommatiHRaySSWangJC, et al. A comprehensive review of recent developments in 3D printing technique for ceramic membrane fabrication for water purification. RSC Adv2019; 9(29): 16869–16883.
53.
SchwarzerEHoltzhausenSScheithauerU, et al. Process development for additive manufacturing of functionally graded alumina toughened zirconia components intended for medical implant application. J Eur Ceram Soc2019; 39(2-3): 522–530.
54.
TrenfieldSJAwadAMadlaCM, et al. Shaping the future: recent advances of 3D printing in drug delivery and healthcare. Expert Opin Drug Deliv2019; 16(10): 1081–1094.
55.
SandreCDe BernardezLSPoggiL, et al. Application of material jetting technology for the development of incision and closure surgical devices. Mater Today Proc2022; 70: 673–677.
56.
RyuDJBanHYJungEY, et al. Osteo-compatibility of 3D titanium porous coating applied by direct energy deposition (DED) for a cementless total knee arthroplasty implant: in vitro and in vivo study. J Clin Med2020; 9(2): 478.
57.
HuYCongWWangX, et al. Laser deposition-additive manufacturing of TiB-Ti composites with novel three-dimensional quasi-continuous network microstructure: effects on strengthening and toughening. Compos B Eng2018; 133: 91–100.
58.
ChinSYDikshitVMeera PriyadarshiniB, et al. Powder-based 3D printing for the fabrication of device with micro and mesoscale features. Micromachines2020; 11(7): 29–40.
59.
MaharubinSHuYSooriyaarachchiD, et al. Laser engineered net shaping of antimicrobial and biocompatible titanium-silver alloys. Mater Sci Eng C2019; 105: 110059.
60.
CulmoneCSmitGBreedveldP.Additive manufacturing of medical instruments: a state-of-the-art review. Addit Manuf2019; 27: 461–473.
61.
HossainMIKhanMSKhanIK, et al. Technology of additive manufacturing: a comprehensive review. Kufa J Eng2024; 15(1): 108–146.
62.
Paz-GonzálezJAVelasco-SantosCVillarreal-GómezLJ, et al. Structural composite based on 3D printing polylactic acid/carbon fiber laminates (PLA/CFRC) as an alternative material for femoral stem prosthesis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2023; 138: 105632.
63.
JahnkePSchwarzSZiegertM, et al. Paper-based 3D printing of anthropomorphic CT phantoms: feasibility of two construction techniques. Eur Radiol2019; 29(3): 1384–1390.
64.
NHS England. Improving outcomes through personalised medicine, 2016, pp.1–18.
65.
NizamMPurohitRTaufikM.Materials for 3D printing in healthcare sector: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med2024; 238(10): 939–963.
66.
RanjanRKumarDKunduM, et al. A critical review on classification of materials used in 3D printing process. Mater Today Proc2022; 61: 43–49.
67.
YadavASrivastavASinghA, et al. Investigation on the materials used in additive manufacturing: a study. Mater Today Proc2020; 43: 154–157.
68.
AlqutaibiAYAlghauliMAAljohaniMHA, et al. Advanced additive manufacturing in implant dentistry: 3D printing technologies, printable materials, current applications and future requirements. Bioprinting2024; 42: e00356.
69.
DuRSuYXYanY, et al. A systematic approach for making 3D-printed patient-specific implants for craniomaxillofacial reconstruction. Engineering2020; 6(11): 1291–1301.
70.
Revilla-LeónMÖzcanM.Additive manufacturing technologies used for 3D metal printing in dentistry. Curr Oral Health Rep2017; 4(3): 201–208.
71.
DemirAGPrevitaliB.Additive manufacturing of cardiovascular CoCr stents by selective laser melting. Mater Des2017; 119: 338–350.
72.
MorganNB.Medical shape memory alloy applications - the market and its products. Mater Sci Eng A2004; 378(1–2): 16–23.
73.
ReynaertsDPeirsJVan BrusselH.Shape memory micro-actuation for a gastro-intestinal intervention system. Sens Actuators A Phys1999; 77(2): 157–166.
74.
JinJWangDQianH, et al. Precision pore structure optimization of additive manufacturing porous tantalum scaffolds for bone regeneration: a proof-of-concept study. Biomaterials2025; 313: 122756.
75.
AliyuAAAPoungsiriKShinjoJ, et al. Additive manufacturing of tantalum scaffolds: processing, microstructure and process-induced defects. Int J Refract Metals Hard Mater2023; 112: 106132.
76.
BaiLGongCChenX, et al. Additive manufacturing of customized metallic. Metals2019; 9(9): 1004.
77.
SakthiabiramiKKangJHJangJG, et al. Hybrid porous zirconia scaffolds fabricated using additive manufacturing for bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C2021; 123: 111950.
78.
PatilNAKandasubramanianB.Biological and mechanical enhancement of zirconium dioxide for medical applications. Ceram Int2020; 46(4): 4041–4057.
79.
SahasrabudheHBandyopadhyayA.Laser-based additive manufacturing of zirconium. Appl Sci2018; 8(3): 393.
80.
DonateRMonzónMAlemán-DomínguezME.Additive manufacturing of PLA-based scaffolds intended for bone regeneration and strategies to improve their biological properties. e-Polymers2020; 20(1): 571–599.
81.
PohPSPChhayaMPWunnerFM, et al. Polylactides in additive biomanufacturing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2016; 107: 228–246.
82.
WoodruffMAHutmacherDW.The return of a forgotten polymer - polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci2010; 35(10): 1217–1256.
IfkovitsJLBurdickJA.Review: photopolymerizable and degradable biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng2007; 13(10): 2369–2385.
85.
VossFKUllrichFMünchJ, et al. SI - additive manufacturing of hydrogel-based materials for next-generation implantable medical devices. Sci Robot2017; 16: eaah6451.
ShinokaTBreuerCKTanelRE, et al. Heart valves: valve in a lamb model leaflet. Ann Thorac Surg1995; 60: S513–516.
88.
RadmaneshSShabangizSKoupaeiN, et al. 3D printed bio polymeric materials as a new perspective for wound dressing and skin tissue engineering applications: a review. J Polym Res2022; 29(2): 50.
89.
SulimanMISRizalNAMAzmeeMNI, et al. Analysis of 3D printing filament using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). J Appl Eng Des Simulation2024; 4(4): 35–45.
90.
CookeMERamirez-GarciaLunaJLRangel-BerridiK, et al. 3D printed polyurethane scaffolds for the repair of bone defects. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2020; 8: 1–10.
91.
NadhifMHAssyarifyHIrsyadM, et al. Recent advances in 3D printed wound dressings. AIP Conf Proc2021; 2344: 020021. .
92.
CruzRLJRossMTPowellSK, et al. Advancements in soft-tissue prosthetics part A: the art of imitating life. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2020; 8: 1–20.
93.
YinJLuanS.Opportunities and challenges for the development of polymer-based biomaterials and medical devices. Regen Biomater2016; 3(2): 129–135.
94.
AntichCde VicenteJJiménezG, et al. Bio-inspired hydrogel composed of hyaluronic acid and alginate as a potential bioink for 3D bioprinting of articular cartilage engineering constructs. Acta Biomater2020; 106: 114–123.
95.
NohIKimNTranHN, et al. 3D printable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel for its potential application as a bioink in tissue engineering. Biomater Res2019; 23(1): 3.
96.
MilazzoMContessi NegriniNSciallaS, et al. Additive manufacturing approaches for hydroxyapatite-reinforced composites. Adv Funct Mater2019; 29(35): 1–26.
97.
MishchenkoOYanovskaAKosinovO, et al. Synthetic calcium–phosphate materials for bone grafting. Polymers2023; 15(18): 1–49.
98.
TavoniMDapportoMTampieriA, et al. Bioactive calcium phosphate-based composites for bone regeneration. J Compos Sci2021; 5(9): 227.
99.
EstevesAVMMartinsMISoaresP, et al. Additive manufacturing of ceramic alumina/calcium phosphate structures by DLP 3D printing. Mater Chem Phys2022; 276: 125417.
100.
AbdudeenAAbu QudeiriJEKareemA, et al. Latest Developments and insights of orthopedic implants in biomaterials using additive manufacturing technologies. J Manuf Mater Process2022; 6(6): 162.
101.
YuTZhuXYuH, et al. Material extrusion-based additive manufacturing of zirconia toughened alumina: machinability, mechanical properties and biocompatibility. J Manuf Process2023; 94: 120–132.
102.
MartelliABellucciDCannilloV.Additive manufacturing of polymer/bioactive glass scaffolds for regenerative medicine: a review. Polymers2023; 15(11): 2473.
GalanteRFigueiredo-PinaCGSerroAP.Additive manufacturing of ceramics for dental applications: a review. Dent Mater2019; 35(6): 825–846.
105.
SezerNEvisZKoçM.Additive manufacturing of biodegradable magnesium implants and scaffolds: review of the recent advances and research trends. J Magnes Alloys2021; 9(2): 392–415.
106.
DongJLinPPutraNE, et al. Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of Mg-Zn/bioceramic composite scaffolds. Acta Biomater2022; 151: 628–646.
107.
GeMXieDYangY, et al. Additive manufacturing a novel bioceramic bone scaffold with MgO/Ca3(PO4)2: microstructure, mechanical property and controllable degradation behavior. J Mater Res Technol2023; 27: 2249–2263.
108.
AwadATrenfieldSJGaisfordS, et al. 3D printed medicines: a new branch of digital healthcare. Int J Pharm2018; 548(1): 586–596.
109.
TümerEHErbilHY.Extrusion-based 3D printing applications of PLA composites: a review. Coatings2021; 11(4): 390.
110.
LiXZhengFWangX, et al. Biomaterial inks for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting: property, classification, modification, and selection. Int J Bioprinting2022; 9(2): 649.
111.
ArifZUKhalidMYNorooziR, et al. Recent advances in 3D-printed polylactide and polycaprolactone-based biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Int J Biol Macromol2022; 218: 930–968.
112.
SefeneEM.State-of-the-art of selective laser melting process: a comprehensive review. J Manuf Syst2022; 63: 250–274.
113.
KumarS.Selective laser sintering: a qualitative and objective approach. Jom2003; 55(10): 43–47.
114.
RouillardADBerglundCMLeeJY, et al. Methods for photocrosslinking alginate hydrogel scaffolds with high cell viability. Tissue Eng Part C: Methods2011; 17(2): 173–179.
115.
HuangXWangXZhaoY.Study on a series of water-soluble photoinitiators for fabrication of 3D hydrogels by two-photon polymerization. Dyes Pigm2017; 141: 413–419.
116.
NguyenTShenWHapgoodK.Drop penetration time in heterogeneous powder beds. Chem Eng Sci2009; 64(24): 5210–5221.
117.
PeriferakisAPeriferakisATTroumpataL, et al. Use of biomaterials in 3D printing as a solution to microbial infections in arthroplasty and osseous reconstruction. Biomimetics2024; 9(3): 1–31.
118.
DarghiasiSFFarazinAGhazaliHS.Design of bone scaffolds with calcium phosphate and its derivatives by 3D printing: a review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2024; 151: 106391.
119.
ZhangLForghamHShenA, et al. Nanomaterial integrated 3D printing for biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B2022; 10(37): 7473–7490.
120.
DuKZhuYXuH, et al. Multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis modification and biomedical applications. Prog Chem2011; 23(8): 2287–2298.
121.
Afsana JainVHaiderN, et al. 3D printing in personalized drug delivery. Curr Pharm Des2019; 24(42): 5062–5071.
122.
TayRYSongYYaoDR, et al. Direct-ink-writing 3D-printed bioelectronics. Mater Today2023; 71: 135–151.
123.
Kholgh EshkalakSRezvani GhomiEDaiY, et al. The role of three-dimensional printing in healthcare and medicine. Mater Des2020; 194: 108940.
124.
SharmaAOhMCKimJT, et al. Investigation of electrochemical corrosion behavior of additive manufactured Ti–6Al–4V alloy for medical implants in different electrolytes. J Alloys Comp2020; 830: 154620.
125.
BurtonHEEisensteinNMLawlessBM, et al. The design of additively manufactured lattices to increase the functionality of medical implants. Mater Sci Eng C2019; 94: 901–908.
126.
SoroNBrodieEGAbdal-hayA, et al. Additive manufacturing of biomimetic titanium-tantalum lattices for biomedical implant applications. Mater Des2022; 218: 110688.
127.
Ziegler-GrahamKMacKenzieEJEphraimPL, et al. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2008; 89(3): 422–429.
128.
IqbalTWangLLiD, et al. A general multi-objective topology optimization methodology developed for customized design of pelvic prostheses. Med Eng Phys2019; 69: 8–16.
129.
ManeroASmithPSparkmanJ, et al. Implementation of 3D printing technology in the field of prosthetics: past, present, and future. Int J Environ Res Public Health2019; 16(9): 1641.
130.
ElomaaLTeixeiraSHakalaR, et al. Preparation of poly(ε-caprolactone)-based tissue engineering scaffolds by stereolithography. Acta Biomater2011; 7(11): 3850–3856.
131.
HollanderDAvon WalterMWirtzT, et al. Structural, mechanical and in vitro characterization of individually structured Ti-6Al-4V produced by direct laser forming. Biomaterials2006; 27(7): 955–963.
132.
PatelPGohilP.Custom orthotics development process based on additive manufacturing. Mater Today Proc2022; 59: A52–A63.
133.
AliMHSmagulovZOtepbergenovT.Finite element analysis of the CFRP-based 3D printed ankle-foot orthosis. Procedia Comput Sci2021; 179: 55–62.
134.
Lokesh KumarMDhanush BabuRSherwin RobertR, et al. Evaluation of 3D printed customizable hand orthosis for forearm fractures based on finite element modelling. Mater Today Proc2022; 62: 4707–4713.
135.
TothLSchifferANyitraiM, et al. Developing an anti-spastic orthosis for daily home-use of stroke patients using smart memory alloys and 3D printing technologies. Mater Des2020; 195: 109029.
136.
YangHSParkJY.3D printer application for endoscope-assisted spine surgery instrument development: from prototype instruments to patient-specific 3D models. Yonsei Med J2020; 61(1): 94–99.
137.
Andrés-CanoPCalvo-HaroJAFillat-GomàF, et al. Role of the orthopaedic surgeon in 3D printing: current applications and legal issues for a personalized medicine. Rev Española Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatol (English Ed) 2021; 65(2): 138–151.
138.
NizamMPurohitRTaufikM.3D printing in healthcare: a review on drug printing, challenges and future perspectives. Mater Today Commun2024; 40: 110199.
139.
KyobulaMAdedejiAAlexanderMR, et al. 3D inkjet printing of tablets exploiting bespoke complex geometries for controlled and tuneable drug release. J Control Release2017; 261: 207–215.
140.
ÖblomHCornettCBøtkerJ, et al. Data-enriched edible pharmaceuticals (DEEP) of medical cannabis by inkjet printing. Int J Pharm2020; 589: 119866.
141.
GoyanesARobles MartinezPBuanzA, et al. Effect of geometry on drug release from 3D printed tablets. Int J Pharm2015; 494(2): 657–663.
142.
SadiaMArafatBAhmedW, et al. Channelled tablets: an innovative approach to accelerating drug release from 3D printed tablets. J Control Release2018; 269: 355–363.
143.
FinaFGoyanesAMadlaCM, et al. 3D printing of drug-loaded gyroid lattices using selective laser sintering. Int J Pharm2018; 547(1-2): 44–52.
144.
XuXRobles-MartinezPMadlaCM, et al. Stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing of an antihypertensive polyprintlet: case study of an unexpected photopolymer-drug reaction. Addit Manuf2020; 33: 101071.
145.
KyserAJFotouhBMahmoudMY, et al. Rising role of 3D-printing in delivery of therapeutics for infectious disease. J Control Release2024; 366: 349–365.
146.
OkwuosaTCPereiraBCArafatB, et al. Fabricating a shell-core delayed release tablet using dual FDM 3D printing for patient-centred therapy. Pharm Res2017; 34(2): 427–437.
147.
MandryckyCWangZKimK, et al. 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol Adv2016; 34(4): 422–434.
148.
GuZFuJLinH, et al. Development of 3D bioprinting: from printing methods to biomedical applications. Asian J Pharm Sci2020; 15(5): 529–557.
149.
GaoCLuCJianZ, et al. 3D bioprinting for fabricating artificial skin tissue. Colloids Surf B Biointerface2021; 208: 112041.
150.
ZenniferASubramanianASethuramanS.Design considerations of bioinks for laser bioprinting technique towards tissue regenerative applications. Bioprinting2022; 27: e00205.
151.
SkeldonGLucendo-VillarinBShuW.Three-dimensional bioprinting of stem-cell derived tissues for human regenerative medicine. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci2018; 373(1750): 20170224.
152.
WengTZhangWXiaY, et al. 3D bioprinting for skin tissue engineering: current status and perspectives. J Tissue Eng2021; 12: 20417314211028574.
153.
HeRWangKRenJ, et al. Efficacy of a synthetic biomimetic skin substitute of PLLA/gelatin nanofiber membrane in facilitating chronic cutaneous wound healing. Mater Technol2020; 35(13-14): 872–880.
154.
KasturiMMathurVAgarwalP, et al. 3D printing for tissue regeneration. In: AshutoshS (ed.) Intech. London: INTECH OPEN, 2010, pp.57–67.
155.
LeeWDebasitisJCLeeVK, et al. Multi-layered culture of human skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes through three-dimensional freeform fabrication. Biomaterials2009; 30(8): 1587–1595.
156.
YangQZhongWXuL, et al. Recent progress of 3D-printed microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. Int J Pharm2021; 593: 120106.
157.
EconomidouSNLamprouDADouroumisD.3D printing applications for transdermal drug delivery. Int J Pharm2018; 544(2): 415–424.
158.
ParkSALeeSHKimWD.Fabrication of porous polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite (PCL/HA) blend scaffolds using a 3D plotting system for bone tissue engineering. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng2011; 34(4): 505–513.
159.
SunHLvHQiuF, et al. Clinical application of a 3D-printed scaffold in chronic wound treatment: a case series. J Wound Care2018; 27(5): 262–271.
160.
LiuSChengLLiuY, et al. 3D bioprinting tissue analogs: current development and translational implications. J Tissue Eng2023; 14: 20417314231187113.
161.
KrujatzFDaniSWindischJ, et al. Think outside the box: 3D bioprinting concepts for biotechnological applications – recent developments and future perspectives. Biotechnol Adv2022; 58: 107930.
162.
ZhuWMaXGouM, et al. 3D printing of functional biomaterials for tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol2016; 40: 103–112.
163.
SaundersREDerbyB.Inkjet printing biomaterials for tissue engineering: bioprinting. Int Mater Rev2014; 59(8): 430–448.
164.
SaundersREGoughJEDerbyB.Delivery of human fibroblast cells by piezoelectric drop-on-demand inkjet printing. Biomaterials2008; 29(2): 193–203.
165.
ChahalDAhmadiACheungKC.Improving piezoelectric cell printing accuracy and reliability through neutral buoyancy of suspensions. Biotechnol Bioeng2012; 109(11): 2932–2940.
166.
WilsonWCBolandT.Cell and organ printing 1: protein and cell printers. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol2003; 272(2): 491–496.
MannoorMSJiangZJamesT, et al. 3D printed bionic ears. Nano Lett2013; 13(6): 2634–2639.
169.
MironovVKasyanovVMarkwaldRR.Organ printing: from bioprinter to organ biofabrication line. Curr Opin Biotechnol2011; 22(5): 667–673.
170.
OzbolatITHospodiukM.Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials2016; 76: 321–343.
171.
CohenDLMaloneELipsonH, et al. Direct freeform fabrication of seeded hydrogels in arbitrary geometries. Tissue Eng2006; 12(5): 1325–1335.
172.
BoularaouiSAl HusseinGKhanKA, et al. An overview of extrusion-based bioprinting with a focus on induced shear stress and its effect on cell viability. Bioprinting2020; 20: e00093.
173.
HsiehFYLinHHHsuSH.3D bioprinting of neural stem cell-laden thermoresponsive biodegradable polyurethane hydrogel and potential in central nervous system repair. Biomaterials2015; 71: 48–57.
174.
Faulkner-JonesAFyfeCCornelissenDJ, et al. Bioprinting of human pluripotent stem cells and their directed differentiation into hepatocyte-like cells for the generation of mini-livers in 3D. Biofabrication2015; 7(4): 44102.
175.
TianSZhaoHLewinskiN.Key parameters and applications of extrusion-based bioprinting. Bioprinting2021; 23: e00156.
176.
LiLShiJMaK, et al. Robotic in situ 3D bio-printing technology for repairing large segmental bone defects. J Adv Res2021; 30: 75–84.
177.
SomanPChungPHZhangAP, et al. Digital microfabrication of user-defined 3D microstructures in cell-laden hydrogels. Biotechnol Bioeng2013; 110(11): 3038–3047.
178.
BorrelloJNasserPIatridisJ, et al. 3D printing a mechanically-tunable acrylate resin on a commercial DLP-SLA printer. Addit Manuf2018; 23: 374–380.
179.
FarooqiKM.Rapid prototyping in cardiac disease: 3D printing the heart. Cham: Springer, 2017.
180.
SchieleNRCorrDTHuangY, et al. Laser-based direct-write techniques for cell printing. Biofabrication2010; 2(3): 032001.
181.
GrueneMDeiwickAKochL, et al. Laser printing of stem cells for biofabrication of scaffold-free autologous grafts. Tissue Eng Part C: Methods2010; 17(1): 79–87.
182.
KérourédanOHakobyanDRémyM, et al. In situ prevascularization designed by laser-assisted bioprinting: effect on bone regeneration. Biofabrication2019; 11(4): 045002.
183.
GuillotinBSouquetACatrosS, et al. Laser assisted bioprinting of engineered tissue with high cell density and microscale organization. Biomaterials2010; 31(28): 7250–7256.
184.
PapaioannouTGManolesouDDimakakosE, et al. 3D bioprinting methods and techniques: applications on artificial blood vessel fabrication. Acta Cardiol Sin2019; 35(3): 284–289.
185.
WangY. Application of 3D bioprinting in cartilage tissue. In: AIP conference proceedings, 2019, vol. 2058. American Institute of Physics Inc.
186.
ChimateCKocB.Pressure assisted multi-syringe single nozzle deposition system for manufacturing of heterogeneous tissue scaffolds. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2014; 75(1-4): 317–330.
187.
LiJChenMFanX, et al. Recent advances in bioprinting techniques: approaches, applications and future prospects. J Transl Med2016; 14: 271.
188.
TaoHMarelliBYangM, et al. Inkjet printing of regenerated silk fibroin: from printable forms to printable functions. Adv Mater2015; 27(29): 4273–4279.
189.
NakamuraMNishiyamaYHenmiC, et al. Ink jet three-dimensional digital fabrication for biological tissue manufacturing: analysis of alginate microgel beads produced by ink jet droplets for three dimensional tissue fabrication. J Imaging Sci Technol2008; 52(6): 60201.
190.
MironovVViscontiRPKasyanovV, et al. Organ printing: tissue spheroids as building blocks. Biomaterials2009; 30(12): 2164–2174.
HorváthLUmeharaYJudC, et al. Engineering an in vitro air-blood barrier by 3D bioprinting. Sci Rep2015; 5(1): 7974.
193.
DuanGJiangSJérômeV, et al. Ultralight, soft polymer sponges by self-assembly of short electrospun fibers in colloidal dispersions. Adv Funct Mater2015; 25(19): 2850–2856.
194.
AliMPagesEDucomA, et al. Controlling laser-induced jet formation for bioprinting mesenchymal stem cells with high viability and high resolution. Biofabrication2014; 6(4): 045001.
195.
ChienKBMakridakisEShahRN.Three-dimensional printing of soy protein scaffolds for tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng Part C: Methods2013; 19(6): 417–426.
196.
ChienKBAguadoBABrycePJ, et al. In vivo acute and humoral response to three-dimensional porous soy protein scaffolds. Acta Biomater2013; 9(11): 8983–8990.
197.
FlemingCSadaghianiMSStellonMA, et al. Effectiveness of three-dimensionally printed models in anatomy education for medical students and resident physicians: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Radiol2020; 17(10): 1220–1229.
198.
KurenovSNIonitaCSammonsD, et al. Three-dimensional printing to facilitate anatomic study, device development, simulation, and planning in thoracic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2015; 149(4): 973–979.e1.
199.
UkeyPDNayakAUddanwadikerR V, et al. International journal of advanced production and industrial engineering temporal bone fabrication using FDM technique. Issues Opp2016; 1(4): 47–52.
200.
VukicevicMMosadeghBMinJK, et al. Cardiac 3D printing and its future directions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging2017; 10(2): 171–184.
201.
MussoFMurmuraFBraviL.Organizational and supply chain impacts of 3D printers implementation in the medical sector. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19(12): 7057.
202.
FrancisVUkeyPNayakA, et al. Influence of 3D printing technology on biomedical applications: a study on surgical planning, procedures, and training. Lect Notes Mech Eng2020; 1(3): 269–278.
203.
MeessKMIzzoRLDryjskiML, et al. 3D printed abdominal aortic aneurysm phantom for image guided surgical planning with a patient specific fenestrated endovascular graft system. In: CookTSZhangJ (eds) Medical imaging 2017: imaging informatics for healthcare, research, and applications. Spie Conference Proceedings. Orlando, 2017, p. 101380P–14.
204.
Bellia-MunzonGMartinezJToselliL, et al. From bench to bedside: 3D reconstruction and printing as a valuable tool for the chest wall surgeon. J Pediatr Surg2020; 55(12): 2703–2709.
205.
ValverdeIGomez-CirizaGHussainT, et al. Three-dimensional printed models for surgical planning of complex congenital heart defects: an international multicentre study. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg2017; 52(6): 1139–1148.
206.
DengXHeSHuangP, et al. A three-dimensional printed model in preoperative consent for ventricular septal defect repair. J Cardiothorac Surg2021; 16(1): 229.
207.
SunZWongYHYeongCH.Patient-specific 3D-printed low-cost models in medical education and clinical practice. Micromachines2023; 14(2): 464.
208.
SunZLauIWongYH, et al. Personalized three-dimensional printed models in congenital heart disease. J Clin Med2019; 8(4): 522.
209.
EthertonDTeeLTillettC, et al. 3D visualization and 3D printing in abnormal gastrointestinal system manifestations of situs ambiguus. Quant Imaging Med Surg2020; 10(9): 1877–1883.
210.
LauIGuptaASunZ.Clinical value of virtual reality versus 3d printing in congenital heart disease. Biomolecules2021; 11(6): 884.
211.
LauIGuptaAIhdayhidA, et al. Clinical applications of mixed reality and 3D printing in congenital heart disease. Biomolecules2022; 12(11): 1548.
212.
BoonsiriphantPAl-SalihiZHollowayJA, et al. The use of 3D printed tooth preparation to assist in teaching and learning in preclinical fixed prosthodontics courses. J Prosthodont2019; 28(2): e545–e547.
213.
HöhneCSchmitterM.3D printed teeth for the preclinical education of dental students. J Dent Educ2019; 83(9): 1100–1106.
214.
ReymusMFotiadouCKesslerA, et al. 3D printed replicas for endodontic education. Int Endod J2019; 52(1): 123–130.
215.
PetreAEPanteaMDraftaS, et al. Modular digital and 3D-printed dental models with applicability in dental education. Med2023; 59(1): 116.
216.
NayakAJainPKKankarPK, et al. Computer-aided design–based guided endodontic: a novel approach for root canal access cavity preparation. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med2018; 232(8): 787–795.
217.
ScanlanABNguyenAVIlinaA, et al. Comparison of 3D echocardiogram-derived 3D printed valve models to molded models for simulated repair of pediatric atrioventricular valves. Pediatr Cardiol2018; 39(3): 538–547.
218.
Meyer-SzaryJWoźniak-MielczarekLSabiniewiczD, et al. Feasibility of in-house rapid prototyping of cardiovascular three-dimensional models for planning and training non-standard interventional procedures. Cardiol J2019; 26(6): 790–792.
219.
HigginsMLeungSRadacsiN.3D printing surgical phantoms and their role in the visualization of medical procedures. Ann 3D Print Med2022; 6: 100057.
220.
van de BeltTHNijmeijerHGrimD, et al. Patient-specific actual-size three-dimensional printed models for patient education in glioma treatment: first experiences. World Neurosurg2018; 117: e99–e105.
221.
PorpigliaFBertoloRCheccucciE, et al.; ESUT Research Group. Development and validation of 3D printed virtual models for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy: urologists’ and patients’ perception. World J Urol2018; 36(2): 201–207.
222.
RipleyBKelilTCheezumMK, et al. 3D printing based on cardiac CT assists anatomic visualization prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr2016; 10(1): 28–36.
223.
KarandikarPMTayadeMCKunkololR.Three-dimensional (3D) printing applications in healthcare sector in India.x. Pravara Med Rev2020; 12: 40–44.
224.
YooSJHusseinNBarronDJ.Congenital heart surgery skill training using simulation models: not an option but a necessity. J Korean Med Sci2022; 37(38): e293.
225.
LamCTKriegerMSGallagherJE, et al. Design of a novel low cost point of care tampon (POCkeT) colposcope for use in resource limited settings. PLoS One2015; 10(9): e0135869.
226.
IrfanUlHaqMKhurooSRainaA, et al. 3D printing for development of medical equipment amidst coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic-review and advancements. Res Biomed Eng2022; 38(1): 305–315.
227.
van der SteltMVerhulstACVas NunesJH, et al. Improving lives in three dimensions: the feasibility of 3D printing for creating personalized medical AIDS in a rural area of Sierra Leone. Am J Trop Med Hyg2020; 102(4): 905–909.
228.
RybickiFJ.3D printing in medicine: coronavirus disease 2019 testing with 3D printed nasopharyngeal swabs. Clin Infect Dis2021; 73(9): E3033–E3035.
229.
YinYZengYChenX, et al. The internet of things in healthcare: an overview. J Ind Inf Integr2016; 1: 3–13.
230.
AthanasopoulouKDanevaGNAdamopoulosPG, et al. Artificial intelligence: the Milestone in modern biomedical research. BioMedInformatics2022; 2(4): 727–744.
231.
ElbadawiMMcCoubreyLEGavinsFKH, et al. Disrupting 3D printing of medicines with machine learning. Trends Pharmacol Sci2021; 42(9): 745–757.
232.
KhademiAKhandanAIranmaneshP, et al. Development of a 3D bioprinted alginate-gelatin hydrogel scaffold loaded with calcium phosphates for dental pulp tissue regeneration. Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. (IJCCE)2025; 44(01): 1–16.
233.
MamoHBAdamiakMKunwarA.3D printed biomedical devices and their applications: a review on state-of-the-art technologies, existing challenges, and future perspectives. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2023; 143: 105930.
234.
DwivediRMehrotraDChandraS.Potential of Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) applications in building a smart healthcare system: a systematic review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res2022; 12(2): 302–318.
235.
JavaidMHaleemAPratap SinghR, et al. Significance of machine learning in healthcare: features, pillars and applications. Int J Intell Networks2022; 3: 58–73.
236.
VishnuSRamsonSRJJeganR.Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)-an overview. In: ICDCS 2020 - 2020 5th international conference on devices, circuits and systems, 2020, pp.101–104.
237.
JavaidMHaleemASinghRP, et al. Internet of things in the global healthcare sector: significance, applications, and barriers. Int J Intell Networks2022; 3: 165–175.
238.
Al-TurjmanFNawazMHUlusarUD.Intelligence in the internet of medical things era: a systematic review of current and future trends. Comput Commun2020; 150: 644–660.
239.
KaragiannisDMitsisKNikitaKS.Development of a low-power IoMT portable pillbox for medication adherence improvement and remote treatment adjustment. Sensors2022; 22(15): 5818.
240.
HajiheydariNDelgoshaMSOlyaH.Scepticism and resistance to IoMT in healthcare: application of behavioural reasoning theory with configurational perspective. Technol Forecast Soc Change2021; 169: 120807.
241.
FatimaSHaleemABahlS, et al. Exploring the significant applications of Internet of Things (IoT) with 3D printing using advanced materials in medical field. Mater Today Proc2021; 45: 4844–4851.
242.
AhmedAAryaSGuptaV, et al. 4D printing: fundamentals, materials, applications and challenges. Polymer2021; 228: 123926.
243.
MuehlenfeldCRobertsSA.3D/4D printing in additive manufacturing: process engineering and novel excipients. In: Maniruzzaman M (ed.), 3D and 4D printing in biomedical applications, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2019, pp.1–23.
244.
AmukarimiSMozafariM.4D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Bioprinting2021; 23: e00161.
245.
GaoBYangQZhaoX, et al. 4D bioprinting for biomedical applications. Trends Biotechnol2016; 34(9): 746–756.
HaleemAJavaidMVaishyaR.5D printing and its expected applications in orthopaedics. J Clin Orthop Trauma2019; 10(4): 809–810.
249.
ForestiRRossiSPinelliS, et al. In-vivo vascular application via ultra-fast bioprinting for future 5D personalised nanomedicine. Sci Rep2020; 10(1): 3205–3213.
250.
AnasSKhanMYRafeyM, et al. Concept of 5D printing technology and its applicability in the healthcare industry. Mater Today Proc2022; 56: 1726–1732.
251.
NahataSOzdoganlarOB.Feasibility of metal additive manufacturing for fabricating custom surgical instrumentation for hip and knee implants. Procedia Manuf2019; 34: 772–779.
252.
Ravinder ReddyP PDeviPA. Manufacturing-4D and 5D printing. Int J Mech Prod Eng Res Dev2018; 8(4): 397–402.
253.
GeorgantzinosSKGiannopoulosGIBakalisPA.Additive manufacturing for effective smart structures: the idea of 6D printing. J Compos Sci2021; 5(5): 1–11.
254.
VasiliadisAVKoukouliasNKatakalosK.From three-dimensional (3D)- to 6D-printing technology in orthopedics: science fiction or scientific reality?J Funct Biomater2022; 13(3): 2–7.
RizzoMLTurcoSSpinaF, et al. 3D printing and 3D bioprinting technology in medicine: ethical and legal issues. Clin Ter2023; 174(1): 80–84.
257.
MladenovskaTChoongPFWallaceGG, et al. The regulatory challenge of 3D bioprinting. Regen Med2023; 18(8): 659–674.
258.
SchuhJCLFunkKA. Compilation of international standards and regulatory guidance documents for evaluation of biomaterials, medical devices, and 3-D printed and regenerative medicine products. Toxicol Pathol2019; 47(3): 344–357.
259.
PetterssonABVBallardiniRMMimlerM, et al. Legal issues and underexplored data protection in medical 3D printing: a scoping review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2023; 11: 1–8.
260.
Di PaoloMBoggiUTurillazziE. Bioethical approach to robot-assisted surgery. Br J Surg2019; 106(10): 1271–1272.
261.
International Medical Device Regulators Forum. Definitions for personalized medical devices, 2018, vol. 10.
262.
RiclesLMCoburnJCDi PrimaM, et al. Regulating 3D-printed medical products. Sci Transl Med2018; 10(461): 1–7.
263.
KhairuzzamanA.Regulatory perspectives on 3D Printing in pharmaceuticals. In: BasitAGaisfordS (eds.) 3D printing of pharmaceuticals. Cham: Springer2018, pp.215–236.
264.
SongXHuMLiB, et al. Advancing medical device regulatory reforms for innovation, translation and industry development in China. J Orthop Translat2022; 37: 89–93.
