Additive Manufacturing (AM) encompasses various techniques creating intricate components from digital models. The aim of incorporating 3D printing (3DP) in the healthcare sector is to transform patient care by providing personalized solutions, improving medical procedures, fostering research and development, and ultimately optimizing the efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare delivery. This review delves into the historical beginnings of AM’s 9 integration into medical contexts exploring various categories of AM methodologies and their roles within the medical sector. This survey also dives into the issue of material requirements and challenges specific to AM’s medical applications. Emphasis is placed on how AM processes directly enhance human well-being. The primary focus of this paper is to highlight the evolution and incentives for cross-disciplinary AM applications, particularly in the realm of healthcare by considering their principle, materials and applications. It is designed for a diverse audience, including manufacturing professionals and researchers, seeking insights into this transformative technology’s medical dimensions.
JandyalAChaturvediIWazirI, et al. 3D printing – a review of processes, materials and applications in industry 4.0. Sustain Oper Comput2022; 3: 33–42.
2.
TaufikMJainPK. Additive manufacturing: current scenario. In: Proceedings of international conference on: advanced production and industrial engineering-ICAPIE, 2016, pp.380–386.
3.
HornTJHarryssonOLA. Overview of current additive manufacturing technologies and selected applications. Sci Prog2012; 95: 255–282.
4.
NegiSDhimanSSharmaRK.Basics, applications and future of additive manufacturing technologies: a review. J Manuf Technol Res2013; 5: 75–96.
5.
JakusAE.An introduction to 3D printing-past, present, and future promise. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2018.
6.
GiannatsisJDedoussisV.Additive fabrication technologies applied to medicine and health care: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2009; 40: 116–127.
7.
ArifZUKhalidMYNorooziR, et al. Additive manufacturing of sustainable biomaterials for biomedical applications. Asian J Pharm Sci2023; 18: 100812.
8.
ArifZU.The role of polysaccharide-based biodegradable soft polymers in the healthcare sector. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res. Epub ahead of print 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.aiepr.2024.05.001.
9.
ArifZUKhalidMYTariqA, et al. 3D printing of stimuli-responsive hydrogel materials: literature review and emerging applications. Giant; 17. Epub ahead of print 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.giant.2023.100209.
10.
NiJLingHZhangS, et al. Three-dimensional printing of metals for biomedical applications. Mater Today Bio2019; 3: 100024.
11.
TareqMSRahmanTHossainM, et al. Additive manufacturing and the COVID-19 challenges: an in-depth study. J Manuf Syst2021; 60: 787–798.
12.
ElbadawiMNikjooDGustafssonT, et al. Pressure-assisted microsyringe 3D printing of oral films based on pullulan and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. Int J Pharm2021; 595: 120197.
13.
SunYSohS.Printing tablets with fully customizable release profiles for personalized medicine. Adv Mater2015; 27: 7847–7853.
14.
CampbellIBourellDGibsonI.Additive manufacturing: rapid prototyping comes of age. Rapid Prototyp J2012; 18: 255–258.
15.
GibsonIRosenDWStuckerB, et al. Additive manufacturing technologies rapid prototyping to direct digital manufacturing. Cham: Springer, 2021
16.
NgWLAnJChuaCK.Process, material, and regulatory considerations for 3D printed medical devices and tissue constructs. Engineering2024; 36: 146–166.
17.
TalibSGuptaSChaudharyV, et al. Additive manufacturing: materials, techniques and biomedical applications. Mater Today Proc2021; 46: 6847–6851.
18.
JavaidMHaleemA.Additive manufacturing applications in medical cases: a literature based review. Alexandria J Med2018; 54: 411–422.
19.
ChoongYYCTanHWPatelDC, et al. The global rise of 3D printing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat Rev Mater2020; 5: 637–639.
20.
Kholgh EshkalakSRezvani GhomiEDaiY, et al. The role of three-dimensional printing in healthcare and medicine. Mater Des2020; 194: 108940.
21.
VakhariaVNKhanSMaratheK, et al. Printing in a Pandemic: 3D printing solutions for healthcare during COVID-19. A protocol for a PRISMA systematic review. Ann 3D Print Med2021; 2: 100015.
22.
JavaidMHaleemA.Additive manufacturing applications in orthopaedics: a review. J Clin Orthop Trauma2018; 9: 202–206.
23.
KarandikarPMTayadeMCKunkololR.Three-dimensional (3D) printing applications in Healthcare sector in India. Pravara Medical Rev2020; 12: 40–44.
24.
RanjanRKumarDKunduM, et al. A critical review on classification of materials used in 3D printing process. Mater Today Proc2022; 61: 43–49.
25.
YadavASrivastavASinghA, et al. Investigation on the materials used in additive manufacturing: a study. Mater Today Proc2020; 43: 154–157.
26.
CailleauxSSanchez-BallesterNMGuecheYA, et al. Fused deposition modeling (FDM), the new asset for the production of tailored medicines. J Control Release2021; 330: 821–841.
27.
KhaledSABurleyJCAlexanderMR, et al. 3D printing of five-in-one dose combination polypill with defined immediate and sustained release profiles. J Control Release2015; 217: 308–314.
28.
NizamMPurohitRTaufikM.3D printing in healthcare: a review on drug printing, challenges and future perspectives. Mater Today Commun2024; 40: 110199.
29.
BallardDHMillsPDuszakR, et al. Medical 3D printing cost-savings in orthopedic and maxillofacial surgery: cost analysis of operating room time saved with 3D printed anatomic models and surgical guides. Acad Radiol2020; 27: 1103–1113.
30.
SabiniewiczRMeyer-SzaryJPotazP, et al. Melody valve implantation pre-procedural planning using custom-made 3D printed model of the region of interest. Postep w Kardiol Interwencyjnej2018; 14: 210–211.
31.
ZelisJMMeiburgRRoijenJJD, et al. 3D-printed stenotic aortic valve model to simulate physiology before, during, and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol2020; 313: 32–34.
32.
PietrabissaAMarconiSNegrelloE, et al. An overview on 3D printing for abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc2020; 34: 1–13.
33.
HuangYJLinKHChenYY, et al. Feasibility and clinical effectiveness of three-dimensional printed model-assisted nuss procedure. Ann Thorac Surg2019; 107: 1089–1096.
34.
SuccoGBerroneMBattistonB, et al. Step-by-step surgical technique for mandibular reconstruction with fibular free flap: application of digital technology in virtual surgical planning. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology2015; 272: 1491–1501.
35.
Meyer-SzaryJLuisMMikulskiS, et al. The role of 3D printing in planning complex medical procedures and training of medical professionals – cross-sectional multispecialty review. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19(3): 3331.
36.
LioufasPAQuayleMRLeongJC, et al. 3D printed models of cleft palate pathology for surgical education. Plast Reconstr Surg – Glob Open2016; 4: 1–6.
37.
JingZZhangTXiuP, et al. Functionalization of 3D-printed titanium alloy orthopedic implants: a literature review. Biomed Mater2020; 15: 9078.
38.
AlqutaibiAYAlghauliMAAljohaniMHA, et al. Advanced additive manufacturing in implant dentistry: 3D printing technologies, printable materials, current applications and future requirements. Bioprinting2024; 42: e00356.
39.
ChenXWangDDouW, et al. Design and manufacture of bionic porous titanium alloy spinal implant based on Selective Laser Melting (SLM). C – Comput Model Eng Sci2020; 124: 1099–1117.
40.
DuRSuYXYanY, et al. A systematic approach for making 3D-printed patient-specific implants for craniomaxillofacial reconstruction. Engineering2020; 6: 1291–1301.
41.
MurrLEGaytanSMMedinaF, et al. Next-generation biomedical implants using additive manufacturing of complex cellular and functional mesh arrays. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci2010; 368: 1999–2032.
42.
Revilla-LeónMÖzcanM.Additive manufacturing technologies used for 3D metal printing in dentistry. Curr Oral Heal Reports2017; 4: 201–208.
43.
GhouseSBabuSVan ArkelRJ, et al. The influence of laser parameters and scanning strategies on the mechanical properties of a stochastic porous material. Mater Des2017; 131: 498–508.
44.
DemirAGPrevitaliB.Additive manufacturing of cardiovascular CoCr stents by selective laser melting. Mater Des2017; 119: 338–350.
45.
IatecolaALonghitanoGAAntunesLHM, et al. Osseointegration improvement of co-cr-mo alloy produced by additive manufacturing. Pharmaceutics2021; 13: 1–19.
46.
PothalaSJagannadha RajuM.Recent advances of metallic bio-materials in additive manufacturing in biomedical implants – a review. Mater Today Proc. Epub ahead of print 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.109.
47.
MorganNB.Medical shape memory alloy applications – the market and its products. Mater Sci Eng A2004; 378: 16–23.
48.
WeiSZhangJZhangL, et al. Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of NiTi shape memory alloys: a review. Int J Extrem Manuf2023; 5: 032001.
49.
ReynaertsDPeirsJVan BrusselH.Shape memory micro-actuation for a gastro-intestinal intervention system. Sensors Actuators, A Phys1999; 77: 157–166.
50.
FarberEZhuJNPopovichA, et al. A review of NiTi shape memory alloy as a smart material produced by additive manufacturing. Mater Today Proc2019; 30: 761–767.
51.
JinJWangDQianH, et al. Precision pore structure optimization of additive manufacturing porous tantalum scaffolds for bone regeneration: a proof-of-concept study. Biomaterials2025; 313: 122756.
52.
JiaoJHongQZhangD, et al. Influence of porosity on osteogenesis, bone growth and osteointegration in trabecular tantalum scaffolds fabricated by additive manufacturing. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2023; 11: 1–16.
53.
AliyuAAAPoungsiriKShinjoJ, et al. Additive manufacturing of tantalum scaffolds: processing, microstructure and process-induced defects. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater2023; 112: 106132.
54.
BaiLGongCChenX, et al. Additive manufacturing of customized metallic. Metals (Basel)2019; 9: 1004.
55.
QiuCFonesAHamiltonHGC, et al. A new approach to develop palladium-modified Ti-based alloys for biomedical applications. Mater Des2016; 109: 98–111.
56.
BasovaTVVikulovaESDorovskikhSI, et al. The use of noble metal coatings and nanoparticles for the modification of medical implant materials. Mater Des2021; 204: 109672.
57.
NiendorfTBrenneFHoyerP, et al. Processing of new materials by additive manufacturing: iron-based alloys containing silver for biomedical applications. Metall Mater Trans A Phys Metall Mater Sci2015; 46: 2829–2833.
58.
van HengelIAJRioolMFratila-ApachiteiLE, et al. Selective laser melting porous metallic implants with immobilized silver nanoparticles kill and prevent biofilm formation by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Biomaterials2017; 140: 1–15.
59.
SakthiabiramiKKangJHJangJG, et al. Hybrid porous zirconia scaffolds fabricated using additive manufacturing for bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C2021; 123: 111950.
60.
PatilNAKandasubramanianB.Biological and mechanical enhancement of zirconium dioxide for medical applications. Ceram Int2020; 46: 4041–4057.
61.
SahasrabudheHBandyopadhyayA.Laser-based additive manufacturing of zirconium. Appl Sci2018; 8: 393.
62.
DonateRMonzónMAlemán-DomínguezME.Additive manufacturing of PLA-based scaffolds intended for bone regeneration and strategies to improve their biological properties. E-Polymers2020; 20: 571–599.
63.
BalogováAFTrebuňováMIžaríkováG, et al. In vitro degradation of specimens produced from pla/phb by additive manufacturing in simulated conditions. Polymers (Basel)2021; 13: 1–17.
64.
ChongWJShenSLiY, et al. Additive manufacturing of antibacterial PLA-ZnO nanocomposites: benefits, limitations and open challenges. J Mater Sci Technol2022; 111: 120–151.
65.
LiYLiDLuB, et al. Current status of additive manufacturing for tissue engineering scaffold. Rapid Prototyp J2015; 21: 747–762.
66.
VenkatramanSSTanLPJosoJFD, et al. Biodegradable stents with elastic memory. Biomaterials2006; 27: 1573–1578.
67.
PohPSPChhayaMPWunnerFM, et al. Polylactides in additive biomanufacturing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2016; 107: 228–246.
68.
WoodruffMAHutmacherDW.The return of a forgotten polymer – polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci2010; 35: 1217–1256.
69.
DashTKKonkimallaVB.Poly-ε-caprolactone based formulations for drug delivery and tissue engineering: a review. J Control Release2012; 158: 15–33.
70.
FrattiniFPereira LopesFRAlmeidaFM, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells in a polycaprolactone conduit promote sciatic nerve regeneration and sensory neuron survival after nerve injury. Tissue Eng – Part A2012; 18: 2030–2039.
71.
ChenJMLeeDYangJW, et al. Solution extrusion additive manufacturing of biodegradable polycaprolactone. Appl Sci2020; 10(9): 3189.
72.
AndradeJ.Hydrogels in medicine and pharmacy. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1989.
73.
IfkovitsJLBurdickJA.Review: photopolymerizable and degradable biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng2007; 13: 2369–2385.
74.
Sarabia-VallejosMACerda-IglesiasFETerrazaCA, et al. Biocompatible and bioactive PEG-Based resin development for additive manufacturing of hierarchical porous bone scaffolds. Mater Des2023; 234: 112315.
75.
VossFKUllrichFMünchJ, et al. SI – additive manufacturing of hydrogel-based materials for next-generation implantable medical devices. Sci Robot2017; 16.
76.
ChuCC.Types and properties of surgical sutures. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing, 2013.
ShinokaTBreuerCKTanelRE, et al. Heart valves: valve in a lamb model leaflet. Ann Thorac Surg1995; 60: S513–S516.
79.
ZaeriACaoKZhangF, et al. A review of the structural and physical properties that govern cell interactions with structured biomaterials enabled by additive manufacturing. Bioprinting2022; 26: e00201.
80.
RadmaneshSShabangizSKoupaeiN, et al. 3D printed bio polymeric materials as a new perspective for wound dressing and skin tissue engineering applications: a review. J Polym Res2022; 29(2): 50.
81.
TylingoRKempaPBanach-KopećA, et al. A novel method of creating thermoplastic chitosan blends to produce cell scaffolds by FDM additive manufacturing. Carbohydr Polym2022; 280: 119028.
82.
ZouQTianXLuoS, et al. Agarose composite hydrogel and PVA sacrificial materials for bioprinting large-scale, personalized face-like with nutrient networks. Carbohydr Polym2021; 269: 118222.
83.
SulimanMISRizalNAMAzmeeMNI, et al. Analysis of 3D printing filament using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). J Appl Eng Des Simul2024; 4: 35–45.
84.
CookeMERamirez-GarciaLunaJLRangel-BerridiK, et al. 3D printed polyurethane scaffolds for the repair of bone defects. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2020; 8: 1–10.
85.
ChionoVMozeticPBoffitoM, et al. Polyurethane-based scaffolds for myocardial tissue engineering. Interf Focus2014; 4(1): 45.
86.
NadhifMHAssyarifyHIrsyadM, et al. Recent advances in 3D printed wound dressings. AIP Conf Proc; 2344. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.1063/5.0047183.
87.
GriffinMCastroNBasO, et al. The current versatility of polyurethane three-dimensional printing for biomedical applications. Tissue Eng – Part B Rev2020; 26: 272–283.
88.
CruzRLJRossMTPowellSK, et al. Advancements in soft-tissue prosthetics part A: the art of imitating life. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2020; 8: 1–20.
89.
MoshkbidECreeDEBradfordL.Biodegradable alternatives to plastic in medical equipment: current state, challenges, and the future. J Compos Sci2024; 8(9): 342.
90.
YinJLuanS.Opportunities and challenges for the development of polymer-based biomaterials and medical devices. Regen Biomater2016; 3: 129–135.
91.
MijangosCCalafelISantamaríaA.Poly(vinyl chloride), a historical polymer still evolving. Polymer (Guildf)2023; 266: 125610.
92.
AntichCde VicenteJJiménezG, et al. Bio-inspired hydrogel composed of hyaluronic acid and alginate as a potential bioink for 3D bioprinting of articular cartilage engineering constructs. Acta Biomater2020; 106: 114–123.
93.
GrönroosPMöröAPuistolaP, et al. Bioprinting of human pluripotent stem cell derived corneal endothelial cells with hydrazone crosslinked hyaluronic acid bioink. Stem Cell Res Ther2024; 15: 1–20.
94.
ViganiBRossiSSandriG, et al. Hyaluronic acid and chitosan-based nanosystems: a new dressing generation for wound care. Expert Opin Drug Deliv2019; 0: 1.
95.
NohIKimNTranHN, et al. 3D printable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel for its potential application as a bioink in tissue engineering. Biomater Res2019; 23: 1–9.
96.
SotohouFMwangiJWMutuaJM, et al. Development and evaluation of recycled polypropylene and bean pod powder composite biomaterial for fused filament fabrication. Adv Mater Phys Chem2023; 13: 31–48.
97.
HaighJNDargavilleTRDaltonPD.Additive manufacturing with polypropylene microfibers. Mater Sci Eng C2017; 77: 883–887.
98.
LópezÁMHašplováMBerglundJ, et al. Influence of surface characteristics of polypropylene on E. coli and S. aureus biofilms: from conventional to additive manufacturing of bioprocess equipment. Appl Mater Today2024; 39: 102312.
99.
OjoSAAbereDVAdejoHO, et al. Additive manufacturing of hydroxyapatite-based composites for bioengineering applications. Bioprinting2023; 32: e00278.
100.
MilazzoMContessi NegriniNSciallaS, et al. Additive manufacturing approaches for hydroxyapatite-reinforced composites. Adv Funct Mater2019; 29: 1–26.
101.
LinKFHeSSongY, et al. Low-temperature additive manufacturing of biomimic three-dimensional hydroxyapatite/collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2016; 8: 6905–6916.
102.
GhiasiBSefidbakhtYMozaffari-JovinS, et al. Hydroxyapatite as a biomaterial – a gift that keeps on giving. Drug Dev Ind Pharm2020; 46: 1035–1062.
103.
MishchenkoOYanovskaAKosinovO, et al. Synthetic calcium–phosphate materials for bone grafting. Polymers (Basel)2023; 15: 1–49.
104.
TavoniMDapportoMTampieriA, et al. Bioactive calcium phosphate-based composites for bone regeneration. J Compos Sci2021; 5(9): 227.
105.
DongYDuanHZhaoN, et al. Three-dimensional printing of β-tricalcium phosphate/calcium silicate composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bio-Design Manuf2018; 1: 146–156.
106.
EstevesAVMMartinsMISoaresP, et al. Additive manufacturing of ceramic alumina/calcium phosphate structures by DLP 3D printing. Mater Chem Phys2021; 276: 125417.
107.
AbdudeenAAbu QudeiriJEKareemA, et al. Latest developments and insights of orthopedic implants in biomaterials using additive manufacturing technologies. J Manuf Mater Process2022; 6(6): 162.
108.
HeerBZhangYBandyopadhyayA.Additive manufacturing of alumina-silica reinforced Ti6Al4V for articulating surfaces of load-bearing implants. Ceram Int2021; 47: 18875–18885.
109.
YuTZhuXYuH, et al. Material extrusion-based additive manufacturing of zirconia toughened alumina: machinability, mechanical properties and biocompatibility. J Manuf Process2023; 94: 120–132.
110.
SimorghSAlasvandNKhodadadiM, et al. Additive manufacturing of bioactive glass biomaterials. Methods2022; 208: 75–91.
111.
MartelliABellucciDCannilloV.Additive manufacturing of polymer/bioactive glass scaffolds for regenerative medicine: a review. Polymers (Basel)2023; 15: 2473.
112.
DixitKSinhaN.Additive manufacturing of carbon nanotube reinforced bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Eng Sci Med Diagnostics Ther; 4. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.1115/1.4051801.
HermanssonL.A review of nanostructured ca-aluminate based biomaterials within odontology and orthopedics. J Korean Ceram Soc2018; 55: 95–107.
115.
GalanteRFigueiredo-PinaCGSerroAP.Additive manufacturing of ceramics for dental applications: a review. Dent Mater2019; 35: 825–846.
116.
ParreiraRMAndradeTLLuzAP, et al. Calcium aluminate cement-based compositions for biomaterial applications. Ceram Int2016; 42: 11732–11738.
117.
SezerNEvisZKoçM.Additive manufacturing of biodegradable magnesium implants and scaffolds: review of the recent advances and research trends. J Magnes Alloy2021; 9: 392–415.
118.
DongJLinPPutraNE, et al. Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of Mg-Zn/bioceramic composite scaffolds. Acta Biomater2022; 151: 628–646.
119.
NabiyouniMBrücknerTZhouH, et al. Magnesium-based bioceramics in orthopedic applications. Acta Biomater2018; 66: 23–43.
120.
GeMXieDYangY, et al. Additive manufacturing a novel bioceramic bone scaffold with MgO/Ca3(PO4)2: microstructure, mechanical property and controllable degradation behavior. J Mater Res Technol2023; 27: 2249–2263.
121.
Seoane-ViañoIJanuskaitePAlvarez-LorenzoC, et al. Semi-solid extrusion 3D printing in drug delivery and biomedicine: personalised solutions for healthcare challenges. J Control Release2021; 332: 367–389.
122.
AwadATrenfieldSJGaisfordS, et al. 3D printed medicines: a new branch of digital healthcare. Int J Pharm2018; 548: 586–596.
123.
TümerEHErbilHY.Extrusion-based 3D printing applications of PLA composites: a review. Coatings2021; 11: 390.
124.
AuthorsF.Effect of layer thickness on irreversible thermal expansion and interlayer strength in fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp J2003; 9: 121.
125.
AnithaRArunachalamSRadhakrishnanP.Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. J Mater Process Technol2001; 118: 385–388.
126.
OzbolatITHospodiukM.Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomaterials2016; 76: 321–343.
127.
LiXZhengFWangX, et al. Biomaterial inks for extrusion-based 3D bioprinting: property, classification, modification, and selection. Int J Bioprinting2022; 9: 649.
128.
ChoudhuryDTunHWWangT, et al. Organ-derived decellularized extracellular matrix: a game changer for bioink manufacturing?Trends Biotechnol2018; 36: 787–805.
129.
MuhindoDElkanayatiRSrinivasanP, et al. Recent advances in the applications of additive manufacturing (3D printing) in drug delivery: a comprehensive review. AAPS PharmSciTech2023; 24: 1–22.
130.
ArifZUKhalidMYHossainM.Recent advances in 3D-printed polylactide and polycaprolactone-based biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Int J Biol Macromol2022; 218: 930–968.
131.
PlaconeJKEnglerAJ.Recent advances in extrusion-based 3D printing for biomedical applications. Adv Healthc Mater2018; 7: 1–11.
132.
IshfaqKAbdullahMMahmoodMA.A state-of-the-art direct metal laser sintering of Ti6Al4V and AlSi10Mg alloys: surface roughness, tensile strength, fatigue strength and microstructure. Opt Laser Technol2021; 143: 107366.
133.
SefeneEM.State-of-the-art of selective laser melting process: a comprehensive review. J Manuf Syst2022; 63: 250–274.
134.
DeshmaneSKendrePMahajanH, et al. Stereolithography 3D printing technology in pharmaceuticals: a review. Drug Dev Ind Pharm2021; 47: 1362–1372.
135.
KumarS.Selective laser sintering: a qualitative and objective approach. JOM2003; 55: 43–47.
136.
DebRoyTWeiHLZubackJS, et al. Additive manufacturing of metallic components – process, structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci2018; 92: 112–224.
137.
ZhuWMaXGouM, et al. 3D printing of functional biomaterials for tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol2016; 40: 103–112.
138.
CerchiariGErleweinSYzombardP, et al. Vat polymerization-based bioprinting – process, materials, applications and regulatory challenges. J Phys B At Mol Opt Phys2019; 0–14.
139.
RouillardADBerglundCMLeeJY, et al. Methods for photocrosslinking alginate hydrogel scaffolds with high cell viability. Tissue Eng – Part C Methods2011; 17: 173–179.
140.
HuangXWangXZhaoY.Study on a series of water-soluble photoinitiators for fabrication of 3D hydrogels by two-photon polymerization. Dye Pigment2017; 141: 413–419.
141.
Mironi-HarpazIWangDYVenkatramanS, et al. Photopolymerization of cell-encapsulating hydrogels: crosslinking efficiency versus cytotoxicity. Acta Biomater2012; 8: 1838–1848.
142.
SunJNgJHFuhYH, et al. Comparison of micro-dispensing performance between micro-valve and piezoelectric printhead. Microsyst Technol2009; 15: 1437–1448.
143.
SaundersREDerbyB.Inkjet printing biomaterials for tissue engineering: bioprinting. Int Mater Rev2014; 59: 430–448.
144.
NgWLHuangXShkolnikovV, et al. Controlling droplet impact velocity and droplet volume: key factors to achieving high cell viability in sub-nanoliter droplet-based bioprinting. Int J Bioprinting2022; 8: 1–17.
145.
DiniFGhaffariSAJafarJ, et al. A review of binder jet process parameters; powder, binder, printing and sintering condition. Met Powder Rep2020; 75: 95–100.
146.
MostafaeiAElliottAMBarnesJE, et al. Binder jet 3D printing – process parameters, materials, properties, modeling, and challenges. Prog Mater Sci2021; 119: 100707.
147.
NguyenTShenWHapgoodK.Drop penetration time in heterogeneous powder beds. Chem Eng Sci2009; 64: 5210–5221.
148.
WangWPinkertonAJWeeLM, et al. Component repair using laser direct metal deposition. In: Proceedings of the 35th international MATADOR conference, 2007, pp.345–350.
149.
HaleyJCZhengBBertoliUS, et al. Working distance passive stability in laser directed energy deposition additive manufacturing. Mater Des2019; 161: 86–94.
150.
MukherjeeTManvatkarVDeA, et al. Mitigation of thermal distortion during additive manufacturing. Scr Mater2017; 127: 79–83.
151.
GibsonIRosenDStuckerB, et al. Sheet lamination. Addit Manuf Technol2021; 253–283.
152.
BegSAlmalkiWHMalikA, et al. 3D printing for drug delivery and biomedical applications. Drug Discov Today2020; 25: 1668–1681.
153.
PesodePBarveSWankhedeSV, et al. Sustainable materials and technologies for biomedical applications. Adv Mater Sci Eng; 2023; 1–22.
154.
ChoonaraYEDu ToitLCKumarP, et al. 3D-printing and the effect on medical costs: a new era?Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res2016; 16: 23–32.
155.
PeriferakisAPeriferakisATTroumpataL, et al. Use of biomaterials in 3D printing as a solution to microbial infections in arthroplasty and osseous reconstruction. Biomimetics2024; 9: 1–31.
156.
DarghiasiSFFarazinAGhazaliHS.Design of bone scaffolds with calcium phosphate and its derivatives by 3D printing: a review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2024; 151: 106391.
157.
LyuXZhengZShivaA, et al. Capillary trapping of various nanomaterials on additively manufactured scaffolds for 3D micro-/nanofabrication. Nat Commun2024; 15: 1–11.
158.
ZhangLForghamHShenA, et al. Nanomaterial integrated 3D printing for biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B2022; 10: 7473–7490.
159.
DuKZhuYXuH, et al. Multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis modification and biomedical applications. Prog Chem2011; 23: 2287–2298.
160.
RuiHXingRXuZ, et al. Synthesis, functionalization, and biomedical applications of multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles. Adv Mater2010; 22: 2729–2742.
161.
LiJWangHCuiJ, et al. Magnetic micromachine using nickel nanoparticles for propelling and releasing in indirect assembly of cell-laden micromodules. Micromachines2019; 10(6): 370.
162.
LasherasXInsaustiMGil De MuroI, et al. Chemical synthesis and magnetic properties of monodisperse Nickel Ferrite nanoparticles for biomedical applications. J Phys Chem C2016; 120(6): 3492–3500.
163.
HuangTYSakarMSMaoA, et al. 3D printed microtransporters: compound micromachines for spatiotemporally controlled delivery of therapeutic agents. Adv Mater2015; 27: 6644–6650.
164.
MuraliNRainuSKSinghN, et al. Advanced materials and processes for magnetically driven micro- and nano-machines for biomedical application. Biosens Bioelectron X2022; 11: 100206.
165.
Afsana JainVHaiderN, et al. 3D printing in personalized drug delivery. Curr Pharm Des2019; 24: 5062–5071.
166.
MaherSKaurGLima-MarquesL, et al. Engineering of micro to nano structured 3D printed drug-releasing titanium implants for enhanced osseointegration and localized delivery of anticancer drugs. ACS Appl Mater Interf2017; 9(35): 29562–29570.
167.
ChenXChenHWuD, et al. 3D printed microfluidic chip for multiple anticancer drug combinations. Sensors Actuators, B Chem2018; 276: 507–516.
168.
UddinJScoutarisNEconomidouSN, et al. Materials Science & Engineering C 3D printed microneedles for anticancer therapy of skin tumours. Mater Sci Eng C2020; 107: 110248.
169.
SarkarNBoseS.Liposome-encapsulated curcumin-loaded 3D printed scaffold for bone tissue engineering Naboneeta Sarkar and Susmita Bose. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2019; 11: 17184–17192.
170.
TayRYSongYYaoDR, et al. Direct-ink-writing 3D-printed bioelectronics. Mater Today2023; 71: 135–151.
Dadras-ToussiOKhorramiMLouis Sam TitusASC, et al. Multiphoton lithography of organic semiconductor devices for 3D printing of flexible electronic circuits, biosensors, and bioelectronics. Adv Mater; 34. Epub ahead of print 2022. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202200512.
173.
HainsworthTSmithLAlexanderS, et al. A fabrication free, 3D printed, multi-material, self-sensing soft actuator. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2020; 5: 4118–4125.
174.
Guo LiangGGuo DongGNguyenVP, et al. A 3D printing-enabled artificially innervated smart soft gripper with variable joint stiffness. Adv Mater Technol2023; 8(24): 1426.
175.
KalkalAKumarSKumarP, et al. Recent advances in 3D printing technologies for wearable (bio)sensors. Addit Manuf2021; 46: 102088.
176.
XueKWangFKSuwardiA, et al. Biomaterials by design: harnessing data for future development. Mater Today Bio2021; 12: 100165.
177.
OngJJCastroBMGaisfordS, et al. Accelerating 3D printing of pharmaceutical products using machine learning. Int J Pharm X; 4. Epub ahead of print 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2022.100120.
178.
SarabiMRAlseedMMKaragozAA, et al. Machine learning-enabled prediction of 3D-printed microneedle features. Biosensors2022; 12: 1–16.
179.
Guo DongGJia MinLGuo LiangG, et al. Machine learning for bioelectronics on wearable and implantable devices: challenges and potential. Tissue Eng Part A2023; 29: 20–46.
180.
GohGDSingSLYeongWY.A review on machine learning in 3D printing: applications, potential, and challenges. Dordrecht: Springer, 2021.
181.
BajpaiAJainPK.Investigation on 3D printing of graphene and multi-walled carbon nanotube mixed flexible electrically conductive parts using fused filament fabrication. J Mater Eng Perform2023; 32: 6319–6328.
182.
PrashanthaKRogerF.Multifunctional properties of 3D printed poly(lactic acid)/graphene nanocomposites by fused deposition modeling. J Macromol Sci Part A Pure Appl Chem2017; 54: 24–29.
183.
HeoaDNCastrobNJLeeaSJ, et al. Enhanced bone tissue regeneration using 3D printed microstructure incorporated with hybrid nano hydrogel. Nanoscale. 2017; 9(16): 5055–5062.
184.
KumarRSinghRSinghM, et al. ZnO nanoparticle-grafted PLA thermoplastic composites for 3D printing applications: tuning of thermal, mechanical, morphological and shape memory effect. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2022; 35: 799–825.
185.
DuXWeiDHuangL, et al. 3D printing of mesoporous bioactive glass/silk fibroin composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C2019; 103: 109731.
186.
SinghJSinghGPandeyPM.Additive manufacturing of functionalized nanomaterials for the modern health care industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2021.
187.
JunphaJWisitsoraatAPrathumwanR, et al. Electronic tongue and cyclic voltammetric sensors based on carbon nanotube/polylactic composites fabricated by fused deposition modelling 3D printing. Mater Sci Eng C2020; 117: 111319.
188.
KwonSNKimSWKimIG, et al. Direct 3D printing of graphene nanoplatelet/silver nanoparticle-based nanocomposites for multiaxial piezoresistive sensor applications. Adv Mater Technol2019; 4: 1–9.
189.
SharmaSGuptaVMudgalD.Current trends, applications, and challenges of coatings on additive manufacturing based biopolymers: a state of art review. Polym Compos2022; 43: 6749–6781.
190.
ArafatMTLamCXFEkaputraAK, et al. Biomimetic composite coating on rapid prototyped scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater2011; 7: 809–820.
191.
GuexAGPuetzerJLArmgarthA, et al. Highly porous scaffolds of PEDOT:PSS for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater2017; 62: 91–101.
192.
KaoCTLinCCChenYW, et al. Poly(dopamine) coating of 3D printed poly(lactic acid) scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C2015; 56: 165–173.
193.
WuFZhengJLiZ, et al. Halloysite nanotubes coated 3D printed PLA pattern for guiding human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) orientation. Chem Eng J2019; 359: 672–683.
194.
LeeSJJoHHLimKS, et al. Heparin coating on 3D printed poly (l-lactic acid) biodegradable cardiovascular stent via mild surface modification approach for coronary artery implantation. Chem Eng J2019; 378: 122116.
195.
JungHDo JangTSLeeJE, et al. Enhanced bioactivity of titanium-coated polyetheretherketone implants created by a high-temperature 3D printing process. Biofabrication2019; 11: 376b.
196.
ZadpoorAA.Design for additive bio-manufacturing: from patient-specific medical devices to rationally designed meta-biomaterials. Int J Mole Sci2017; 18: 1607.
VyavahareSMaheshVMaheshV, et al. Additively manufactured meta-biomaterials: a state-of-the-art review. Compos Struct2023; 305: 116491.
199.
ZadpoorAA.Mechanical performance of additively manufactured meta-biomaterials. Acta Biomaterialia2019; 85: 41–59.
200.
Álvarez-TrejoACuan-UrquizoEBhateD, et al. Mechanical metamaterials with topologies based on curved elements: an overview of design, additive manufacturing and mechanical properties. Mater Des2023; 233: 112190.
201.
HardyJGPalmaMWindSJ, et al. Responsive biomaterials: advances in materials based on shape-memory polymers. Adv Mater2016; 28: 5717–5724.
202.
ChiuWFuchiwakiKUmiseA, et al. Investigations of effects of intermetallic compound on the mechanical properties and shape memory effect of ti–au–ta biomaterials. Materials (Basel)2021; 14: 5810.
203.
QiSGuoHFuJ, et al. 3D printed shape-programmable magneto-active soft matter for biomimetic applications. Compos Sci Technol2020; 188: 107973.
204.
KhalidMYArifZUTariqA, et al. 3D printing of magneto-active smart materials for advanced actuators and soft robotics applications. Eur Polym J2024; 205: 112718.
205.
TariqAArifZUKhalidMY, et al. Recent advances in the additive manufacturing of stimuli-responsive soft polymers. Adv Eng Mater2023; 25(21): 2301074
206.
ShahAMalikMSKhanGS, et al. Stimuli-responsive peptide-based biomaterials as drug delivery systems. Chem Eng J2018; 353: 559–583.
207.
WeiHCuiJLinK, et al. Recent advances in smart stimuli-responsive biomaterials for bone therapeutics and regeneration. Bone Res2022; 10(1): 17.
208.
QiYQiHHeY, et al. Strategy of metal-polymer composite stent to accelerate biodegradation of iron-based biomaterials. ACS Appl Mater Interf2018; 10: 182–192.
209.
NayakGSCarradòAMassonP, et al. Trends in metal-based composite biomaterials for hard tissue applications. JOM2022; 74: 102–125.
210.
XuXJiaZZhengY, et al. Bioadaptability of biomaterials: aiming at precision medicine. Matter2021; 4: 2648–2650.
211.
PalzaHEscobarBBejaranoJ, et al. Designing antimicrobial bioactive glass materials with embedded metal ions synthesized by the sol-gel method. Mater Sci Eng C2013; 33: 3795–3801.
212.
FernandesJSGentilePPiresRA, et al. Multifunctional bioactive glass and glass-ceramic biomaterials with antibacterial properties for repair and regeneration of bone tissue. Acta Biomaterialia2017; 59: 2–11.
213.
BadvMBayatFWeitzJI, et al. Single and multi-functional coating strategies for enhancing the biocompatibility and tissue integration of blood-contacting medical implants. Biomaterials2020; 258: 120291.
214.
BéduerABoniniFVerheyenCA, et al. An injectable meta-biomaterial: from design and simulation to in vivo shaping and tissue induction. Adv Mater2021; 33: 2102350.
215.
YaraliEZadpoorAAStauferU, et al. Auxeticity as a mechanobiological tool to create meta-biomaterials. ACS Appl Bio Mater2023; 6(7), 2562–2575.
216.
KolkenHMAJanbazSLeeflangSMA, et al. Rationally designed meta-implants: a combination of auxetic and conventional meta-biomaterials. Mater Horizons2018; 5: 28–35.
217.
WanniarachchiCTArjunanABaroutajiA, et al. Mechanical performance of additively manufactured cobalt-chromium-molybdenum auxetic meta-biomaterial bone scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2022; 134: 105409.
218.
ChenJVirruetaCZhangS, et al. 4D printing: the spotlight for 3D printed smart materials. Mater Today2024; 77: 66–91.
219.
MomeniFMehdi HassaniMLiuX, et al. A review of 4D printing. Mater Des2017; 122: 42–79.
220.
NorooziRArifZUTaghvaeiH, et al. 3D and 4D bioprinting technologies: a game changer for the biomedical sector?Ann Biomed Eng2023; 51: 1683–1712.
221.
ArifZUKhalidMYAhmedW, et al. A review on four-dimensional (4D) bioprinting in pursuit of advanced tissue engineering applications. Bioprinting2022; 27: e00203.
222.
KhalidMYArifZUNorooziR, et al. 3D/4D printing of cellulose nanocrystals-based biomaterials: additives for sustainable applications. Int J Biol Macromol2023; 251: 126287.
223.
FatimaSHaleemABahlS, et al. Exploring the significant applications of internet of things (IoT) with 3D printing using advanced materials in medical field. Mater Today Proc2021; 45: 4844–4851.
224.
RizzoMLTurcoSSpinaF, et al. 3D printing and 3D bioprinting technology in medicine: ethical and legal issues. Clin Ter2023; 174: 80–84.
225.
MladenovskaTChoongPFWallaceGG, et al. The regulatory challenge of 3D bioprinting. Regen Med2023; 18: 659–674.
226.
SchuhJACLFunkKA. Compilation of international standards and regulatory guidance documents for evaluation of biomaterials, medical devices, and 3-D printed and regenerative medicine products. Toxicol Pathol2019; 47: 344–357.
227.
PetterssonAB V.BallardiniRMMimlerM, et al. Legal issues and underexplored data protection in medical 3D printing: a scoping review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2023; 11: 1–8.
228.
DalyA.Medical 3D printing, intellectual property and regulation. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing2023, pp.385–398.
229.
AimarAPalermoAInnocentiB.The role of 3D printing in medical applications: a state of the art. J Healthc Eng2019; 2019: 1–10.
230.
International Medical Device Regulators Forum. Definitions for personalized medical devices. London: IMDRF, 2018, pp.1–10.
231.
RiclesLMCoburnJCDi PrimaM, et al. Regulating 3D-printed medical products. Sci Transl Med2018; 10: 1–7.
232.
FogarasiMSnodderlyKLDi PrimaMA.A survey of additive manufacturing trends for FDA-cleared medical device. Nat Rev Bioeng2023; 1(10): 687–689.
