Biomechanical behavior of modular acetabular cups made of poly-ether-ether-ketone: A finite element study

Abstract

After total hip arthroplasty, stress-shielding is a potential risk factor for aseptic loosening of acetabular cups made of metals. This might be avoided by the use of acetabular cups made of implant materials with lower stiffness. The purpose of this numerical study was to determine whether a modular acetabular cup with a shell made of poly-ether-ether-ketone or poly-ether-ether-ketone reinforced with carbon fibers might be an alternative to conventional metallic shells. Therefore, the press-fit implantation of modular cups with shells made of different materials (Ti6Al4V, poly-ether-ether-ketone, and poly-ether-ether-ketone reinforced with carbon fibers) and varying liner materials (ceramics and ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene) into an artificial bone cavity was simulated using finite element analysis. The shell material had a major impact on the radial shell deformation determined at the rim of the shell, ranging from 17.9 µm for titanium over 92.2 µm for poly-ether-ether-ketone reinforced with carbon fibers up to 475.9 µm for poly-ether-ether-ketone. Larger radial liner deformations (up to 618.4 µm) occurred in combination with the shells made of poly-ether-ether-ketone compared to titanium and poly-ether-ether-ketone reinforced with carbon fibers. Hence, it can be stated that conventional poly-ether-ether-ketone is not a suitable shell material for modular acetabular cups. However, the radial shell deformation can be reduced if the poly-ether-ether-ketone reinforced with carbon fiber material is used, while deformation of ceramic liners is similar to the deformation in combination with titanium shells.

Keywords

Modular acetabular cup poly-ether-ether-ketone ceramic liner ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene liner shell deformation liner deformation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Pilliar

Lee

Maniatopoulos

Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 208: 108–113.

Anselme

Biomaterials and interface with bone. Osteoporos Int 2011; 22: 2037–2042.

Devine

Hahn

Richards

et al . Coating of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone implants with titanium to improve bone apposition. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2013; 101: 591–598.

Svehla

Morberg

Zicat

et al . Morphometric and mechanical evaluation of titanium implant integration: comparison of five surface structures. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 51: 15–22.

Walsh

Bertollo

Christou

et al . Plasma-sprayed titanium coating to polyetheretherketone improves the bone-implant interface. Spine J 2015; 15: 1041–1049.

Dickinson

Taylor

Browne

The influence of acetabular cup material on pelvis cortex surface strains, measured using digital image correlation. J Biomech 2012; 45: 719–723.

Wright

Pellicci

Salvati

et al . Bone density adjacent to press-fit acetabular components. A prospective analysis with quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A: 529–536.

Kim

Y-H

Yoon

S-H

Kim

J-S.

Changes in the bone mineral density in the acetabulum and proximal femur after cementless total hip replacement: alumina-on-alumina versus alumina-on-polyethylene articulation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 174–179.

Brockett

John

Williams

et al . Wear of ceramic-on-carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether ether ketone hip replacements. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2012; 100: 1459–1465.

10.

Cowie

Briscoe

Fisher

et al . PEEK-OPTIMA^™ as an alternative to cobalt chrome in the femoral component of total knee replacement: a preliminary study. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2016; 230: 1008–1015.

11.

East

Briscoe

Unsworth

Wear of PEEK-OPTIMA^® and PEEK-OPTIMA^®-wear performance articulating against highly cross-linked polyethylene. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2015; 229: 187–193.

12.

Nakahara

Takao

Bandoh

et al . In vivo implant fixation of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK hip prostheses in an ovine model. J Orthop Res 2013; 31: 485–492.

13.

Pace

Marinelli

Spurio

Technical and histologic analysis of a retrieved carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone composite alumina-bearing liner 28 months after implantation. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23: 151–155.

14.

Scholes

Unsworth

Wear studies on the likely performance of CFR-PEEK/CoCrMo for use as artificial joint bearing materials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2009; 20: 163–170.

15.

Scholes

Unsworth

The wear properties of CFR-PEEK-OPTIMA articulating against ceramic assessed on a multidirectional pin-on-plate machine. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2007; 221: 281–289.

16.

Scholes

Inman

Unsworth

et al . Tribological assessment of a flexible carbon-fibre-reinforced poly(ether-ether-ketone) acetabular cup articulating against an alumina femoral head. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2008; 222: 273–283.

17.

Wang

Unsworth

et al . Biotribological study of large diameter ceramic-on-CFR-PEEK hip joint including fluid uptake, wear and frictional heating. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2012; 23: 1533–1542.

18.

Wang

Lin

Polineni

et al . Carbon fiber reinforced polyether ether ketone composite as a bearing surface for total hip replacement. Tribol Int 1998; 31: 661–667.

19.

Fritsche

Bialek

Mittelmeier

et al . Experimental investigations of the insertion and deformation behavior of press-fit and threaded acetabular cups for total hip replacement. J Orthop Sci 2008; 13: 240–247.

20.

Dold

Pandorf

Flohr

et al . Acetabular shell deformation as a function of shell stiffness and bone strength. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2016; 230: 259–264.

21.

Everitt

Deformation on impaction of a large diameter carbon fibre reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone acetabular cup and its effects on the tribology of the bearing. PhD Thesis, Cardiff University, Cardiff, 2011.

22.

Goebel

Kluess

Wieding

et al . The influence of head diameter and wall thickness on deformations of metallic acetabular press-fit cups and UHMWPE liners: a finite element analysis. J Orthop Sci 2013; 18: 264–270.

23.

Jin

Meakins

Morlock

et al . Deformation of press-fitted metallic resurfacing cups. Part 1: experimental simulation. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2006; 220: 299–309.

24.

Langdown

Pickard

Hobbs

et al . Incomplete seating of the liner with the trident acetabular system: a cause for concern? J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 291–295.

25.

Markel

Day

Siskey

et al . Deformation of metal-backed acetabular components and the impact of liner thickness in a cadaveric model. Int Orthop 2011; 35: 1131–1137.

26.

Meding

Small

Jones

et al . Acetabular cup design influences deformational response in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 403–409.

27.

Ong

Rundell

Liepins

et al . Biomechanical modeling of acetabular component polyethylene stresses, fracture risk, and wear rate following press-fit implantation. J Orthop Res 2009; 27: 1467–1472.

28.

Qiu

Wang

et al . The influence of metallic shell deformation on the contact mechanics of a ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2016; 230: 4–12.

29.

Schmidig

Patel

Liepins

et al . The effects of acetabular shell deformation and liner thickness on frictional torque in ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene acetabular bearings. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 644–653.

30.

Squire

Griffin

Mason

et al . Acetabular component deformation with press-fit fixation. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21: 72–77.

31.

Yew

Jin

Donn

et al . Deformation of press-fitted metallic resurfacing cups. Part 2: finite element simulation. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 2006; 220: 311–319.

32.

Bone

Dold

Flohr

et al . The influence of the strength of bone on the deformation of acetabular shells: a laboratory experiment in cadavers. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B: 473–477.

33.

Howcroft

DWJ

Qureshi

Graham

NM.

Seating of ceramic liners in the uncemented trident acetabular shell: is there really a problem?

Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 2651–2655.

34.

McAuley

Dennis

Grostefon

et al . Factors affecting modular acetabular ceramic liner insertion: a biomechanical analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 402–409.

35.

Sharkey

Hozack

Callaghan

et al . Acetabular fracture associated with cementless acetabular component insertion: a report of 13 cases. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 426–431.

36.

Kluess

Martin

Mittelmeier

et al . Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. Med Eng Phys 2007; 29: 465–471.

37.

ORS. 2016 Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society Orlando, FL March 5–8, 2016. J Orthop Res 2016; 34(Suppl. 1): S1.

38.

Shirazi-Adl

Dammak

Paiement

Experimental determination of friction characteristics at the trabecular bone/porous-coated metal interface in cementless implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1993; 27: 167–175.

39.

Kurtz

Edidin

Bartel

DL.

The role of backside polishing, cup angle, and polyethylene thickness on the contact stresses in metal-backed acetabular components. J Biomech 1997; 30: 639–642.

40.

Bergmann

Graichen

Rohlmann

et al . Realistic loads for testing hip implants. Biomed Mater Eng 2010; 20: 65–75.

41.

Bergmann

Bender

Dymke

et al . Standardized loads acting in hip implants. PLoS ONE 2016; 11: e0155612.

42.

Hua

Wang

et al . Contact mechanics of modular metal-on-polyethylene total hip replacement under adverse edge loading conditions. J Biomech 2014; 47: 3303–3309.

43.

Mabuchi

Sakai

Ota

et al . Appropriate radial clearance of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip prostheses to realize squeeze-film lubrication. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2004; 19: 362–369.

44.

Vogel

Dempwolf

Baumann

et al . Characterization of thick titanium plasma spray coatings on PEEK materials used for medical implants and the influence on the mechanical properties. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018; 77: 600–608.

45.

Y-C

Kim

S-Y

Kim

et al . Ceramic liner fracture after cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 458: 106–110.

46.

Hasegawa

Sudo

Hirata

et al . Ceramic acetabular liner fracture in total hip arthroplasty with a ceramic sandwich cup. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 658–661.

47.

Lopes

Philippeau

Passuti

et al . High rate of ceramic sandwich liner fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470: 1705–1710.

48.

Okita

Hasegawa

Takahashi

et al . Failure analysis of sandwich-type ceramic-on-ceramic hip joints: a spectroscopic investigation into the role of the polyethylene shell component. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014; 31: 55–67.

49.

Park

Y-S

Hwang

S-K

Choy

W-S

et al . Ceramic failure after total hip arthroplasty with an alumina-on-alumina bearing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 780–787.

50.

Viste

Chouteau

Desmarchelier

et al . Fractures of a sandwich ceramic liner at ten year follow-up. Int Orthop 2012; 36: 955–960.

51.

Wang

Sun

J-Y

Zha

G-C

et al . Mid term results of total hip arthroplasty using polyethylene-ceramic composite (sandwich) liner. Indian J Orthop 2016; 50: 10–15.

52.

Begand

Glien

Oberbach

ATZ—a new material with a high potential in joint replacement. Key Eng Mater 2005; 284–286: 983–986.

53.

Ghosh

Gupta

Bone remodelling around cementless composite acetabular components: the effects of implant geometry and implant-bone interfacial conditions. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014; 32: 257–269.